The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | RESnWEB |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #29 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #22 18 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #14 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #10 6 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | RESnWEB |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #24 15 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #23 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #18 13 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #19 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | RESnWEB |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #18 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #20 12 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 14 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #14 3 条评价 |
When choosing a booking engine for your hotel, your primary concern is often the balance between features, ease of use, and support. RESnWEB by RESnWEB and Roiback | Booking Engine aim to serve this purpose, but their approaches and market presence differ significantly. RESnWEB, as a property management-focused platform, appears to lack recent reviews and has no verified customer ratings, raising questions about its current viability. Conversely, Roiback boasts over 43 recent reviews, a high user rating, and a clear global presence, making it the more substantial option for hoteliers seeking proven functionality.
Both products address online booking management, but Roiback’s extensive feature set and recent positive reviews make it a more reliable tool for today’s hotel environment. How do these differences translate into your hotel’s specific needs?
RESnWEB is described as a property management system (PMS) designed to streamline real estate operations, focusing on tenant management, lease tracking, and maintenance. It’s cloud-based, aiming to improve operational efficiency and data accuracy, but it has zero reviews or ratings, indicating limited recent user feedback or market adoption.
Roiback, on the other hand, is a dedicated booking engine with over 43 reviews in the last six months—more recent and more numerous. It scores an impressive 72 in the HT Score and a 4.72 in customer support, demonstrating high satisfaction levels. Roiback’s extensive feature set, including multi-language support, booking abandonment recovery, and integration with major channel managers, caters directly to hotel sales and marketing needs.
While RESnWEB might be suitable for property management, it’s not clear how well it performs as a booking engine today. Roiback’s recent reviews and high ratings suggest it’s a more reliable choice for direct booking growth. Are you primarily seeking a property management tool or a booking engine to boost direct sales?
If your hotel needs a dedicated, feature-rich booking engine that enhances direct bookings, go with Roiback. It has a proven track record with over 43 recent reviews and a high customer satisfaction score, making it ideal for hotels focused on increasing online sales and improving user experience.
If your hotel’s primary goal is property management rather than direct booking optimization, RESnWEB may seem like a viable option. However, with no recent reviews or recognized customer feedback, its effectiveness remains uncertain. Given Roiback’s extensive feature set, including multi-lingual support, conversion tools, and integrations, it’s the more comprehensive choice for most hotels.
In summary, for hotels prioritizing direct booking performance, Roiback’s proven market presence and recent reviews make it the clear winner. RESnWEB’s lack of current reviews limits confidence in its ability to support modern hotel needs.
Roiback’s UI scores a 4.49 out of 5, with many reviews praising its intuitive, user-friendly design. Customers highlight its straightforward booking process, clear rate grids, and easy rate adjustments, making onboarding smooth for staff.
RESnWEB, in contrast, has a score of 0/5, with no recent reviews to assess usability or onboarding experience. The lack of feedback signals uncertainty about its ease of use or how well staff can adopt it without dedicated support.
Edge: Roiback.
Roiback offers 36 unique features, including mobile responsiveness, urgency messaging, multi-room bookings, booking abandonment recovery, and extensive payment options like Apple Pay and Google Pay. Its feature set continually expands, supporting complex promotions, multi-currency transactions, and detailed analytics.
RESnWEB offers no features beyond its basic property management capabilities, which are not detailed or compared. Its lack of unique booking-related features makes it less competitive in today’s hotel tech landscape.
Edge: Roiback.
Roiback’s customer support scores 4.72 out of 5, with reviews praising its responsiveness and personalized consulting. Hotels benefit from dedicated account managers and proactive advice, which are critical for optimizing direct sales.
RESnWEB’s support scores are unavailable, and no recent reviews provide insights into its support quality. The absence of verified customer feedback suggests uncertainty about its support effectiveness.
Edge: Roiback.
Roiback connects with 27 verified partners, including major channel managers, guest experience tools, and analytics platforms. Its integrations facilitate seamless updates, multi-channel management, and enhanced data collection.
RESnWEB lists no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel systems. This restricts its flexibility and may hinder operational efficiency.
Edge: Roiback.
With 43 recent reviews and a high NPS score of 9/5, Roiback is the clear favorite among hoteliers, especially in Europe, Asia Pacific, and the Americas. Its user ratings consistently reflect satisfaction with features, support, and overall value.
RESnWEB, with no reviews or ratings, offers no recent feedback to assess hotel sentiment. Its market presence appears minimal or outdated.
Edge: Roiback.
RESnWEB provides no publicly available pricing, which suggests it may be custom or outdated. Its lack of transparent costs complicates comparison.
Roiback charges a base fee of $500 per month, with no mention of additional implementation fees or per-room charges. This predictable pricing model simplifies budgeting for most hotels.
Not ideal if your hotel’s focus is on increasing direct bookings or online sales, given the lack of recent reviews.
Not ideal if your hotel has very limited online direct sales or prefers very low-cost solutions without extensive features.
Roiback’s primary advantage is its proven market presence, recent reviews, and comprehensive feature set tailored for direct booking growth. Its high customer support and integrations make it suitable for hotels that want a reliable, scalable booking engine.
RESnWEB, although possibly suitable for property management, lacks recent user feedback and has no verified reviews, casting doubt on its current effectiveness as a booking solution. For hoteliers focused on direct sales and guest experience, Roiback offers a clear, validated advantage.
If your hotel needs a proven booking engine with extensive features, support, and recent positive user feedback, Roiback is the definitive choice. Reserve RESnWEB for property management needs only if you confirm its current capabilities and support, which remains uncertain given the available data.
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Partnering with Roiback has been a game-changer, as their innovative solutions and close support by our Direct Channel Specialist have empowered Jasmine City Group to reach new h..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要... Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要作用。
Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有... Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有所提高。
关键反馈包括要求加快系统响应速度、减少重复和 404 错误等技术故障以及统一平台以简化流程。这些技术改进对于实现无缝用户体验至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
该平台的用户友好型和直观预订引擎受到好评,并提到其流畅的多语言支持和易用性。然而,一些用户要求改进默认语言设置和界面设计,以提供更好的用户体验。
虽然该平台支持多种支付网关,但用户建议需要扩展支付选项,特别是整合更多的本地和国际网关,以避免连接问题。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。RESnWEB 和 Roiback | Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。RESnWEB 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Roiback | Booking Engine 提供 27 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Roiback | Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
RESnWEB:否。Roiback | Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。RESnWEB 的 HT Score 为 0,ROIBACK 的为 72。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问