The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 34 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Shalom PMS 表现出色 .
Shiji Group 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
基于 HTR 上 34 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $1,200/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 34 |
在分析了 34 条经验证的评价后,Shalom PMS 用户最看重其 ,而 Shiji Group 用户则强调 易于使用, 支持团队, 执行。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Shalom PMS |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
|
|
+
执行
▾
|
|
|
+
培训材料
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
|
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Shalom PMS |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | — | #53 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #31 17 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #11 13 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #22 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Shalom PMS |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #33 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #24 25 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #22 19 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #45 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Shalom PMS |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #33 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #30 8 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #14 5 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #5 14 条评价 |
Choosing between Shalom PMS and Shiji Daylight PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and priorities. Both platforms aim to streamline hotel operations, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. While Shalom PMS claims to offer a comprehensive management solution, it currently has no reviews, ratings, or recent customer feedback, making it difficult to assess its effectiveness. Conversely, Shiji Daylight PMS commands a strong market presence with 32 recent reviews, high ratings, and a broad feature set. How should you evaluate these differences?
Shalom PMS is marketed as a comprehensive property management system designed to centralize operations and automate routine tasks. However, it has no reviews or recent customer feedback, raising questions about its actual performance and user satisfaction. On the other hand, Shiji Daylight PMS boasts a robust profile backed by 32 recent reviews, a high customer satisfaction score, and a 4.63/5 ease of use rating. This significant review volume and recency give you more confidence in its real-world capabilities.
Both systems aim to improve operational efficiency, but Shiji’s market presence and recent reviews suggest it’s more battle-tested. Shalom’s lack of user feedback makes it hard to judge whether it truly delivers on its promises. Are you comfortable risking implementation without verified user experiences? Given current data, Shiji Daylight PMS is the clearer choice for hotels seeking proven performance.
If your hotel needs a straightforward, cloud-based PMS that promises automation and a centralized approach but is willing to accept the risk of limited validation, Shalom PMS might seem appealing. However, if your property seeks a mature platform with a proven track record, comprehensive features, and extensive integrations, Shiji Daylight PMS is the clear winner.
Property managers at larger hotels, chains, or brands looking for detailed reporting, automation, and multi-property management should prioritize Shiji. Smaller hotels or independents willing to experiment with an unreviewed platform might consider Shalom, but caution is advised. Overall, for assured functionality and proven support, go with Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shalom PMS currently has no ratings or reviews, so assessing its usability is difficult. In contrast, Shiji Daylight PMS is rated 4.63/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward training process. Users appreciate how quickly new team members can learn the system, citing comprehensive training materials and minimal learning curve. The high support score of 4.53/5 further indicates that onboarding and ongoing assistance are well-handled.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shalom PMS does not list any features, making it impossible to compare in detail. Conversely, Shiji Daylight PMS offers 98 features, including guest profiles, multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, guest messaging, group booking management, real-time reporting, automated night audits, PCI and GDPR compliance, and more. These features are crucial for modern hotel operations, especially for multi-property groups.
While Shalom PMS’s feature set remains unknown, Shiji’s extensive capabilities—particularly those that support automation, integration, and guest experience—provide a definitive advantage. For hotels seeking a feature-rich platform that can handle complex, multi-faceted operations, Shiji Daylight PMS is the clear choice.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
There are no recent reviews or ratings for Shalom PMS, so support quality remains unverified. Shiji Daylight PMS, however, scores 4.53/5 in customer support, with reviews highlighting helpful, professional, and responsive service. Guests appreciate the 24/7 support availability and comprehensive onboarding, which ease implementation and daily use.
Given the lack of evidence for Shalom PMS, Shiji Daylight PMS’s support reputation makes it the more reliable choice for hotels that prioritize assistance and quick resolution of issues.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shalom PMS has no verified integrations listed, raising concerns about its ability to connect with other hotel systems. In contrast, Shiji Daylight PMS supports 64 verified partners, including Booking.com, SiteMinder, Revinate, IDeaS, Amadeus, Duetto, and more. Its API-everything approach allows seamless connection to CRS, POS systems, payment gateways, and marketing tools.
If integration flexibility is vital for your hotel’s tech ecosystem, Shiji is the more capable choice. The absence of verified integrations for Shalom PMS makes it less attractive for complex or multi-system environments.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shalom PMS has no reviews or recent ratings, making it impossible to gauge user sentiment. Conversely, Shiji Daylight PMS boasts a 8.94/5 NPS score based on recent reviews, with an overall customer satisfaction rating of 4.63/5. Hotels across various segments, especially luxury and branded properties, rate it highly for usability, features, support, and operational impact.
Hoteliers appear to trust Shiji more, given its recent, positive feedback. The lack of reviews for Shalom PMS leaves its reputation and user satisfaction unverified.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shalom PMS does not list any pricing information, leaving potential buyers in the dark. Shiji Daylight PMS costs $1,200 upfront, with no monthly or implementation fees disclosed, though this may vary depending on needs.
Without transparent pricing for Shalom PMS, evaluating value is difficult. Shiji’s clear, posted price provides a baseline for budgeting, especially for larger or tech-savvy hotels.
Not ideal if your hotel requires proven, feature-rich technology, extensive integrations, or reliable support. Larger, multi-property, or tech-dependent hotels should consider more established solutions.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, with minimal tech needs, or prefers a low-cost, less feature-intensive solution. Smaller independents might find the platform overly complex or costly.
Shalom PMS appears to be an unproven, bare-bones property management solution lacking recent reviews, support data, or feature disclosures. It’s a risky choice for hotels that need reliability, proven functionality, and extensive integrations. Without verified feedback, its effectiveness remains uncertain.
Shiji Daylight PMS, on the other hand, benefits from 32 recent reviews, high ratings, and a clearly articulated feature set. It’s suited for hotels seeking a mature, scalable platform that can improve operational efficiency, guest experiences, and revenue management.
If your hotel requires a trusted, well-supported PMS with proven performance, Shiji Daylight PMS is the clear choice. Only consider Shalom PMS if you are comfortable with exploratory, unvalidated solutions for very small or experimental properties. Given current data, Shiji Daylight PMS is the safer, more reliable investment.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Shalom PMS |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,200/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Shalom PMS 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Shalom PMS |
|
|---|---|---|
| 任务管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 集中用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 86 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞石基 PMS 的用户界面友好,简化了日常操作,降低了新用户的学习难度。评论中强调了其易用性,指出其培训材料易懂、设计直观、任务执行高效。
石基PMS支持团队的支持和响应能力一直受到好评。用户赞赏支持人员的专业性和乐于助人的精神,这对更顺利地运营有很大帮助。
一些评论者认为石基 PMS 的实施过程流畅高效,他们赞赏知识渊博、积极主动的实施团队。不过,一些用户建议缩短实施时间以进一步改善体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管石基 PMS 的详细报告功能广受好评,但一些用户仍希望获得更先进、更快速的报告工具。具体要求包括增强的汇总报告、详细的账单和更快的报告生成流程。
与系统速度和一致性相关的性能问题是用户普遍关心的问题,一些用户指出在高峰操作期间响应时间很慢。用户敦促提高系统速度以提高整体效率。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Shalom PMS 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Shalom PMS 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Shiji Daylight PMS 提供 64 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Shiji Daylight PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Shalom PMS:否。Shiji Daylight PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Shalom PMS 的 HT Score 为 0,Shiji Group 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问