The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 32 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
SHR Group 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Event Based Automations and Guest Feedback Module (comment cards/reviews).
TRAVELNET SOLUTIONS 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Marketing Automation.
基于 HTR 上 32 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 30 | 2 |
在分析了 32 条经验证的评价后,SHR Group 用户最看重其 客户服务, crm 功能, 营销工具,而 TRAVELNET SOLUTIONS 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
CRM 功能
▾
|
|
|
+
营销工具
▾
|
|
|
+
预订引擎
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
发展问题
▾
|
|
|
−
用户界面
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客户关系管理与电子邮件营销 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #13 6 条评价 | #31 0 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #11 21 条评价 | #31 0 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #18 2 条评价 | #22 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #21 1 条评价 | #18 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #11 19 条评价 | #32 1 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #14 13 条评价 | #29 1 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #14 11 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #18 2 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #8 14 条评价 | #18 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #15 12 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #6 3 条评价 | #12 1 条评价 |
Choosing between SHR Customer Relationship Management (CRM) by SHR Group and TRACK Hospitality Software involves understanding how each addresses your hotel’s marketing, guest engagement, and operational needs. SHR Group’s CRM offers a broad suite of features aimed at loyalty and data-driven marketing, while TRACK provides a more streamlined communication platform with essential CRM functions. Both aim to improve guest relationships, but their strengths differ significantly.
Given the review data, SHR Group’s CRM has a much higher rating, more recent reviews, and a sizable user base, making it the more reliable choice for hotels seeking comprehensive guest management. Do you want a feature-rich, highly-rated platform, or a simpler, communication-focused solution?
SHR Group's CRM is designed as a full-scale, integrated guest engagement and loyalty platform with 26 reviews, including many recent ones, and an overall rating of 0/5 but a high HTScore of 33.7, reflecting its comprehensive capabilities. TRACK, with only 2 reviews and a perfect 5/5 rating, is praised for its simplicity and communication tools but lacks the breadth of features and recent feedback.
SHR Group excels in centralizing guest data, automating marketing campaigns, and offering advanced segmentation, loyalty programs, and integrations, which are critical for larger or more sophisticated hotels. Conversely, TRACK is more suitable if you primarily need a straightforward communication system with basic CRM features, especially in vacation rentals or resorts. Are you looking for a comprehensive, feature-heavy CRM or a simplified communication platform?
If your hotel needs advanced segmentation, loyalty management, and data analysis to foster guest loyalty and increase revenue, SHR Group is the clear choice. Its suite of 19 unique features—like guest feedback modules, event-based automations, and open API—support sophisticated marketing strategies.
On the other hand, if your focus is on improving guest communication via voice, email, and chat, with a secondary need for sales and marketing tools, TRACK offers a simpler, more accessible platform. It’s better suited for hotels that prioritize ease of use over the depth of features. For growth in loyalty and detailed guest insights, go with SHR; for straightforward communication, choose TRACK.
SHR Group’s ease of use is rated 4.77/5, with positive onboarding reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface and well-supported implementation. However, some users note that the platform's complexity may require training, especially for advanced features. Its recent reviews highlight ongoing development but also some delays and interface improvements needed.
TRACK’s UI scores a modest 3/5, reflecting a simpler but less modern interface. Reviewers praise its drag-and-drop template builder for email campaigns but mention a steeper learning curve when navigating its broader functionalities. Staff adoption may be quicker with TRACK due to its straightforward design.
Edge: SHR Group.
SHR Group’s CRM offers 19 exclusive features, including a centralized data warehouse, segmentation, guest feedback modules, loyalty programs, and open API access. These tools support personalized marketing, detailed guest insights, and automation, giving it a significant edge for data-driven strategies.
TRACK provides only 2 unique features—segmentation and marketing automation—limiting its capabilities compared to SHR. While it covers essential communication and sales functions, it lacks the advanced tools for loyalty, data analysis, and integration that SHR offers.
Edge: SHR Group.
SHR Group’s support ratings are outstanding at 4.92/5, with reviews emphasizing responsive, knowledgeable, and professional assistance. Many users remark on the smooth onboarding process and ongoing support, contributing to a high likelihood to recommend (96%).
TRACK’s support ratings are lower at 2.75/5, with reviews citing slow responses and dissatisfaction with onboarding processes. Some mention delays and difficulties in getting timely help, which can impact your hotel’s ability to implement and troubleshoot the system effectively.
Edge: SHR Group.
SHR Group integrates with 81 verified partners, including key property management systems, CRMs, and revenue tools, offering a broad ecosystem to streamline your operations. Shared integrations with platforms like WebRezPro, Mews, and Oracle Hospitality highlight its extensive connectivity.
TRACK features 15 verified partners, focusing on communication, bookings, and some revenue tools, with fewer options for extensive ecosystem integration. Its integrations are sufficient for basic communication but limited compared to SHR’s comprehensive network.
Edge: SHR Group.
Despite SHR’s broader capabilities, its reviews are sparse and often outdated, with a 0/5 overall rating, reflecting perhaps its complex nature or recent issues. Meanwhile, TRACK’s 5/5 rating from only 2 reviews indicates high satisfaction, but with very limited data.
In terms of recent, consistent feedback, SHR’s larger review base and recent ratings favor it as a more dependable choice. For specialized, small-scale communication needs, TRACK’s high rating may be appealing, but the lack of review volume diminishes confidence.
Edge: SHR Group.
Both products do not publicly disclose specific pricing, indicating customized quotes based on hotel size and needs. SHR Group’s pricing likely reflects its extensive feature set, which can be more costly, whereas TRACK may be more affordable but limited in scope.
Since detailed prices aren’t available, your best approach is to request quotes from both vendors to compare value based on your hotel’s scale and feature requirements.
Not ideal if you prefer a simple, plug-and-play tool or have limited staff training resources. Small boutique hotels with basic communication needs may find SHR’s extensive features unnecessary.
Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced loyalty programs, detailed segmentation, or extensive automation. Larger properties with complex data needs might find TRACK’s features too limited.
SHR Group’s CRM is a highly-rated, feature-rich platform designed for hotels seeking deep guest insights, loyalty management, and extensive integrations. Its higher review count and recent feedback make it the more dependable choice for hotels aiming to scale and optimize marketing efforts.
Choose SHR if your hotel needs detailed segmentation, comprehensive automation, and strong support, especially in larger or more sophisticated hotel segments. It’s suited for properties looking to maximize revenue and guest loyalty through data-driven strategies.
Opt for TRACK if your hotel prioritizes ease of use, quick setup, and effective communication tools without the complexity of advanced features. It works well for smaller properties, resorts, or vacation rentals that want straightforward guest messaging and basic CRM functionalities.
In summary, SHR Group delivers a robust, well-supported platform with proven results for larger or data-intensive hotels. TRACK offers simplicity and ease, ideal for properties with limited marketing automation needs or smaller teams. Your decision should align with your hotel’s strategic goals, size, and operational complexity.
酒店客户关系管理与电子邮件营销 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,SHR Customer Relationship Management (CRM) 和 TRACK Hospitality Software 共享 5 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 分割 | ||
| 客人反馈模块(评论卡/评论) | ||
| 所见即所得 - HTML 编辑器 | ||
| 数据库健康监控 | ||
| 电子邮件通讯 | ||
| 营销自动化 | ||
| 营销自动化 | ||
| 集中式数据仓库 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 9 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
评论经常称赞 SHR Group 出色的客户服务。用户强调支持团队的响应能力、专业性和乐于助人,使实施和持续使用更加顺畅。值得一提的是,他们称赞了特定的客户经理... 评论经常称赞 SHR Group 出色的客户服务。用户强调支持团队的响应能力、专业性和乐于助人,使实施和持续使用更加顺畅。值得一提的是,他们称赞了特定的客户经理和支持人员。
CRM 系统因其管理价格、套餐和数据分析的工具而受到称赞,丰富了客人体验并促进了营销。一些反馈建议采用更现代的设计来增强用户界面。
SHR Group 的营销工具(包括 CRM 和电子邮件)因能提高客户参与度和运营效率而备受推崇。用户对其在推动直接预订和节省佣金成本方面的功能表示赞赏。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户注意到开发和更新的延迟,这与最近的收购有关,这减缓了新功能实现和增强的进度。
虽然 SHR Group 工具的功能受到称赞,但一些评论表示需要更直观、更现代的用户界面,特别是 CRS 和 CRM 方面,以满足不同技术水平的用户的需求。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。SHR Customer Relationship Management (CRM) 和 TRACK Hospitality Software 共享许多核心 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 功能,但各有独特的能力。SHR Customer Relationship Management (CRM) 提供 81 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 TRACK Hospitality Software 提供 15 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。SHR Customer Relationship Management (CRM) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 3.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
SHR Customer Relationship Management (CRM):否。TRACK Hospitality Software:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。SHR Group 的 HT Score 为 34,TRAVELNET SOLUTIONS 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问