项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店POS系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 117 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 105 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 22 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #5 2 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #1 120 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #2 107 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 62 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 33 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #9 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 206 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #2 36 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #2 10 条评价 |
Choosing a POS system for your hotel involves evaluating features, ease of use, support, and overall value. Toast by Toast and Vento ePOS by HOTELTIME are two leading options, but they serve different hotel types and operational needs. Your decision hinges on which system aligns best with your hotel’s size, complexity, and regional presence. Do you prioritize a platform with more reviews and recent feedback, or one with a broader feature set?
Toast and HOTELTIME both address the core needs of hotel POS systems—order management, billing, and integration—but they diverge significantly in market presence and feature depth. Toast is renowned in North America for restaurant-specific functionalities but lacks recent reviews and a high overall rating. HOTELTIME, meanwhile, boasts over 200 reviews, a 4.83 out of 5 rating, and a 94% likelihood to recommend, making it the more tested and trusted option.
While Toast emphasizes its simplicity for restaurant environments, HOTELTIME offers extensive features like inventory management, customer insights, and loyalty programs, making it more suitable for properties with complex F&B operations. Given the recent review activity, HOTELTIME is the more reliable choice if you want current user insights. Are you looking for a highly integrated solution or a straightforward POS?
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich POS that integrates directly with property management and offers advanced restaurant controls, Vento ePOS is the better choice. It supports stock management, real-time transaction posting, and seamless integration—especially valuable for hotels with busy F&B outlets or multiple properties.
On the other hand, if your hotel primarily requires a simple, cloud-based POS for restaurant operations without extensive inventory or customer management needs, Toast's streamlined platform may suffice. Given its lack of recent reviews and lower overall score, Vento ePOS’s broader feature set and proven hotel integrations make it the safer, more comprehensive investment.
HOTELTIME leads in ease of use with a 4.71/5 rating from over 200 reviews, and users consistently highlight its intuitive interface and quick onboarding. Reviewers appreciate its user-friendly design, particularly for front-of-house staff, and note that ongoing support helps smooth the learning curve.
Toast, with a 0/5 rating in ease of use, suffers from limited recent feedback, but historically, it has been considered user-friendly within restaurant environments. Still, its lack of recent reviews suggests less confidence in its current usability. Edge: HOTELTIME.
HOTELTIME offers a remarkable 30 features exclusive to its platform, including inventory management, customer profiles, digital menus, loyalty programs, and detailed reporting tools. These features provide a comprehensive suite for managing both hotel and restaurant operations, making it suitable for properties seeking an all-in-one solution.
Toast, by contrast, does not provide any features beyond its core POS, focusing on restaurant-specific functions like tableside ordering and quick menu updates. Its limited feature set makes it less appealing for hotels needing advanced management tools. Edge: HOTELTIME.
HOTELTIME consistently receives high marks for support, with a 4.76/5 rating and recent reviews praising its responsive, proactive customer service. Users praise the company's ongoing development and quick response times, even for minor issues.
Toast's support ratings are unavailable, and with no recent reviews, confidence in its support quality is weaker. Given HOTELTIME’s active support reputation, it’s the safer choice for hotels prioritizing reliable assistance. Edge: HOTELTIME.
HOTELTIME boasts 58 verified integrations, including key partners like Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR, alongside common integrations like Omniboost and Cloudbeds. This extensive partner network allows your hotel to connect with many property management, booking, and revenue tools.
Toast offers only 13 verified integrations, mainly focused on restaurant and hospitality tools, with limited hotel-specific partners. If integration breadth is critical, HOTELTIME’s ecosystem provides more options. Edge: HOTELTIME.
HOTELTIME’s review score of 4.83/5 from over 200 reviews makes it the more highly-rated system among hoteliers, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease, support, and feature set. Hotels of various sizes, including luxury and resort properties, rate it highly, especially for its reliability and flexibility.
Toast’s review data is nonexistent, and its overall rating is 0/5—indicating no recent user feedback or endorsements. For current, positive sentiment, HOTELTIME is clearly the preferred choice.
Toast does not publicly list its pricing, but it is known for a model that typically involves custom quotes and potentially high setup costs, especially for restaurant-heavy operations. HOTELTIME charges a flat $300 monthly fee, with no setup fees or trial options disclosed, making it straightforward to evaluate.
Given the lack of transparent pricing for Toast, HOTELTIME’s predictable cost structure offers better budget clarity and planning.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in scope: HOTELTIME offers a multi-feature platform tailored to hotels with extensive F&B needs, while Toast centers on restaurant POS functions, mainly for North American markets.
Choose HOTELTIME if you want a well-rounded, highly-rated system with broad integrations and ongoing support—especially if your hotel operates across multiple regions. Opt for Toast if your primary need is a straightforward restaurant POS in a region where it’s proven, and your hotel’s operational complexity is limited.
For hotels seeking a dependable, feature-rich solution with recent positive reviews, HOTELTIME is the clear winner. Its proven track record, extensive features, and strong regional presence make it the safer, more comprehensive choice.
If your focus is on simple restaurant operations within North America, and you prioritize a lightweight, easy-to-deploy POS, Toast might still be worth considering. However, its lack of recent reviews and lower ratings tilt the decision toward HOTELTIME.
This comparison is based on the latest available reviews, feature data, and regional presence, ensuring you can confidently select the system best suited to your hotel’s needs.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
订单管理
|
|
|
| 自助桌边点餐 | ||
| 追加销售 | ||
| 数字菜单 | ||
| 高级订购 | ||
| 折扣和促销 | ||
| 移动订购 | ||
| 集成厨房展示 | ||
|
▾
Inventory Management
|
|
|
| 库存管理 | ||
| 成分管理 | ||
| 库存报告 | ||
| 股票警报 | ||
| 配方成本核算 | ||
| 食品成本报告 | ||
| 报告导出 | ||
|
▾
CRM & Loyalty
|
|
|
| 用户管理 | ||
| 折扣和促销 | ||
| 宾客简介 | ||
| 奖励计划 | ||
| 营销活动 | ||
| 客户洞察报告 | ||
| 分割 | ||
| 实体会员卡 | ||
|
▾
Accounting
|
|
|
| 折扣和促销 | ||
| 客户洞察报告 | ||
| 付款日志报告 | ||
| 会计软件集成 | ||
| 映射 | ||
| 同步错误警报 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 追加销售 | ||
| 折扣和促销 | ||
| 客户洞察报告 | ||
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 支票拆分 | ||
| 退款管理和欺诈预防 | ||
| 付款日志报告 | ||
|
▾
Analytics & Insights
|
|
|
| 员工报告和管理 | ||
| 销售报告 | ||
| 菜单绩效报告 | ||
| 服务器推荐 | ||
| 服务器级别报告 | ||
| 宾客简介 | ||
| 移动分析 | ||
| 食品成本报告 | ||
| 报告导出 | ||
| 客户洞察报告 | ||
|
▾
Delivery
|
|
|
| 多平台整合 | ||
| Uber Eats | ||
| 冲门 | ||
| 配送菜单定制 | ||
| 折扣和促销 | ||
| 评论集锦 | ||
| 菜单同步 | ||
|
▾
Other
|
|
|
| 本地 | ||
| 基于云 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
许多评价者表示HotelTime界面直观,易于学习,帮助他们高效处理日常酒店和餐厅事务。他们提到入住登记更快,预订录入更便捷,信息访问更迅速,工作流程更顺畅,... 许多评价者表示HotelTime界面直观,易于学习,帮助他们高效处理日常酒店和餐厅事务。他们提到入住登记更快,预订录入更便捷,信息访问更迅速,工作流程更顺畅,从而减少了运营摩擦。
支持是评论中最突出的主题之一,用户称赞响应迅速、故障排除有帮助,以及实施过程中沟通顺畅。也有一些用户希望获得更多现场培训和更深入的设置指导,表明支持质... 支持是评论中最突出的主题之一,用户称赞响应迅速、故障排除有帮助,以及实施过程中沟通顺畅。也有一些用户希望获得更多现场培训和更深入的设置指导,表明支持质量较高,但入门培训还有提升空间。
用户反复强调HotelTime能够将酒店运营与餐厅/POS活动连接起来,特别是在预订、房费、账单和部门协调方面。这种集成帮助员工提高工作效率,并为管理层提供更好的... 用户反复强调HotelTime能够将酒店运营与餐厅/POS活动连接起来,特别是在预订、房费、账单和部门协调方面。这种集成帮助员工提高工作效率,并为管理层提供更好的酒店整体监督。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
用户常常希望获得更详细、整合且可定制的报告,特别是在生产力、客人服务和管理决策方面。用户希望减少手动操作,获得更多关于销售、人员配置和运营绩效的实时可... 用户常常希望获得更详细、整合且可定制的报告,特别是在生产力、客人服务和管理决策方面。用户希望减少手动操作,获得更多关于销售、人员配置和运营绩效的实时可视化。
评论者喜欢标准模板和核心功能,但有几位表示HotelTime可以更好地适应特定酒店的需求。他们希望有更灵活的自定义报告、权限设置和可配置的工作流程,这将有助于... 评论者喜欢标准模板和核心功能,但有几位表示HotelTime可以更好地适应特定酒店的需求。他们希望有更灵活的自定义报告、权限设置和可配置的工作流程,这将有助于系统适应独特的运营模式。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Toast 和 Vento ePOS 共享许多核心 Hotel POS Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Toast 提供 13 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Vento ePOS 提供 60 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Vento ePOS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Toast:否。Vento ePOS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel POS Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Toast 的 HT Score 为 0,HOTELTIME 的为 97。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐