The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 152 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
TOTVS 表现出色 .
Visual Matrix PMS 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Revenue Management Module.
基于 HTR 上 152 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 152 |
在分析了 152 条经验证的评价后,TOTVS 用户最看重其 ,而 Visual Matrix PMS 用户则强调 technical support challenges, 用户友好的界面, comprehensive reporting tools。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| TOTVS |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
|
+
用户友好的界面
▾
|
|
|
+
Comprehensive reporting tools
▾
|
|
|
+
Streamlined operations
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
|
−
Booking and reservation management
▾
|
|
|
−
系统速度和功能可用性
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | TOTVS |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #18 23 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 117 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #11 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #16 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | TOTVS |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #12 38 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #16 17 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #1 124 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #4 44 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | TOTVS |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #7 141 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #32 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #18 2 条评价 |
Choosing between TOTVS and Visual Matrix PMS hinges on your hotel’s operational needs, budget, and growth plans. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge sharply in maturity, feature set, and user experience. TOTVS, with no recent reviews or user ratings, appears inactive and untested in the hospitality space. Visual Matrix, on the other hand, boasts a substantial review base and recent positive feedback, making it a more reliable option for hoteliers seeking proven solutions.
Your team must decide whether a potentially outdated, unreviewed system like TOTVS can meet your needs or if the well-rated, feature-rich Visual Matrix is the smarter choice. Are you willing to bet on an untested platform, or do you prefer a system with demonstrated customer satisfaction?
TOTVS and Visual Matrix PMS are designed to address core hotel management challenges—reservation handling, guest communication, and operational oversight. However, TOTVS lacks recent reviews, a significant red flag, suggesting limited ongoing development or support. Visual Matrix, with over 143 recent reviews and an 8.81/10 NPS score, shows consistent customer satisfaction and active user engagement.
While TOTVS’s ratings are nonexistent, Visual Matrix’s 80+ rating points and recent reviews indicate it’s a trusted, tested platform. Would your hotel risk adopting a system with zero feedback, or does proven performance align better with your strategic goals?
If your hotel needs a user-friendly, feature-rich management system with active support and recent positive feedback, go with Visual Matrix. Its comprehensive modules—booking, housekeeping, revenue management, and integrations—cater to both small and large properties. Conversely, if your hotel operates in a niche market with minimal tech requirements and prefers a system with no ongoing costs, TOTVS might seem appealing, though its lack of recent activity limits its credibility.
Given the extensive reviews, active development, and multiple modules, Visual Matrix suits hotels that require an all-in-one platform and value ongoing support. If minimal features and no recent validation suffice, TOTVS could be considered, but the risk is high.
Visual Matrix scores 4.43/5 for ease of use, with specific praise for its intuitive interface, mobile app, and straightforward scheduling tools. Reviewers mention how quickly staff can learn and adopt the platform, which reduces onboarding time. In contrast, TOTVS has zero ratings or reviews, making it impossible to evaluate its user-friendliness or onboarding process.
Edge: Visual Matrix.
Visual Matrix offers 55 features, including multi-lingual support, channel management, booking engine, POS, revenue and rate management, group booking, guest profiles, digital registration, automated reminders, and guest messaging. Many of these modules are absent from TOTVS, which provides no discernible feature set based on available data.
Given its extensive feature list, Visual Matrix clearly dominates in versatility and functionality. Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
Visual Matrix’s reviews consistently mention knowledgeable, responsive support rated 4.34/5, with comments praising their active listening and helpful weekly tips. Reviewers also note that support is quick and effective during critical moments. TOTVS’s support ratings are unavailable, and the lack of recent reviews raises concerns about ongoing support quality.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
Visual Matrix integrates with 23 verified partners, including major booking channels, CRS, and guest apps, providing a broad ecosystem. TOTVS, with no verified partners, offers no evidence of integration capabilities, limiting its usefulness in a modern, connected hotel environment.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
With 143 reviews in the last six months, Visual Matrix’s rating of 3.75/5 and an NPS of 8.81/10 reflect solid recent satisfaction. Its property segment ratings favor branded hotels, which give it a 4/5 average. TOTVS’s score remains at zero, indicating no recent or any reviews, thus providing no basis for comparison.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
TOTVS does not disclose pricing details; it likely operates on customized quotes or legacy agreements. Visual Matrix has a clear starting price of $500 per month, with no mention of additional implementation costs or tiered pricing.
Given the transparency, hotel decision-makers can better evaluate ROI with Visual Matrix’s known pricing. TOTVS’s lack of clarity makes cost comparison impossible.
The core difference is that TOTVS remains an unreviewed, untested platform with minimal available data, whereas Visual Matrix is a well-rated, actively supported hotel management system. Your choice hinges on your hotel’s need for reliability, features, and support.
If you need a proven platform with ongoing development, 24/7 support, and extensive modules, Visual Matrix is the clear choice. Its recent reviews confirm it can meet the demands of modern hotel management.
Conversely, if your hotel operates with minimal tech needs and prefers a system with no clear support or feature set, TOTVS might appear attractive, but the lack of recent validation makes it a risky investment.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking efficiency, growth, and peace of mind, Visual Matrix offers the stability and features that ensure your team can focus on delivering exceptional guest experiences.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| TOTVS |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,TOTVS 和 Visual Matrix PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | TOTVS |
|
|---|---|---|
| 团体预订引擎 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 销售点 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 43 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
Visual Matrix 的直观设计降低了学习难度,方便新员工使用。然而,一些用户提到,从其他系统过渡到 Visual Matrix 初期会遇到一些困难。
Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occu... Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occupancy, revenue, and forecasting.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
The software's seamless integration with booking channels minimizes overbooking and improves reservation accuracy, ultimately maximizing revenue.
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。TOTVS 和 Visual Matrix PMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。TOTVS 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Visual Matrix PMS 提供 23 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Visual Matrix PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.4/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
TOTVS:否。Visual Matrix PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。TOTVS 的 HT Score 为 0,Visual Matrix PMS 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问