The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 165 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Guestnet 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Profiles and Mobile Checkin.
Tourismart 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 165 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $500/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 165 | 0 |
在分析了 165 条经验证的评价后,Guestnet 用户最看重其 user-friendly interface, seamless information dissemination, 积极的宾客体验,而 Tourismart 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Tourismart
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless Information Dissemination
▾
|
|
|
+
积极的宾客体验
▾
|
|
|
+
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Technical Issues and Performance
▾
|
|
|
−
与外部系统的集成
▾
|
|
|
−
推送通知和提醒
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Tourismart
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 56 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #2 85 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #17 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #23 0 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Tourismart
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #3 52 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 66 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #7 18 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #3 14 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Tourismart
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #13 3 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 158 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 0 条评价 | — |
You’re deciding between Guestnet by Guestnet and Tourismart by Tourismart for your hotel guest app. Both aim to improve guest communication and operational efficiency, but they diverge significantly in maturity, features, and market presence. Guestnet offers a well-established platform with glowing reviews and robust integrations, while Tourismart markets itself as an all-in-one management system with limited review data. Which solution aligns best with your hotel’s needs?
Guestnet has established itself as a leading guest app platform with a high score of 96.36 on the HotelTechReport (HTR) scale, backed by 152 reviews—more recent reviews (51 in the last six months) strengthen its current relevance. Tourismart, however, currently has no reviews or ratings, making its effectiveness uncertain.
Guestnet’s reviews emphasize its user-friendly interface, seamless communication capabilities, and strong integration options, which have helped hotels streamline guest interactions and boost revenue. In contrast, Tourismart’s limited publicly available customer feedback makes it difficult to assess its real-world performance, though it promotes an all-in-one approach to guest services and hotel management.
If you prioritize proven performance and verified customer satisfaction, Guestnet’s recent data makes it the clearer choice. Are you comfortable taking a risk on a less documented platform, or do you prefer a solution with a proven track record?
If your hotel needs a dedicated, highly-rated guest app with proven integrations and a track record of increasing guest satisfaction, go with Guestnet. It’s especially suitable for hotels that value seamless digital communication, automated guest information, and strong PMS integrations—its 20 verified partners, including Mews and ASA Hotelsoftware, attest to its reliability.
If your hotel is looking for a comprehensive hotel management system that claims to serve both guest and back-end needs from a single platform, Tourismart might seem appealing. However, with no review data to verify its claims, it’s risky to rely on it for core guest engagement or operational functions. For certainty and proven results, Guestnet remains the safer bet.
Guestnet’s UI scores 4.74 out of 5, with onboarding rated at 4.66/5 and customer support at 4.82/5 based on 152 reviews—these ratings reflect a highly intuitive, well-supported platform. Users praise its clear design, automation features, and quick learning curve, which facilitate staff adoption and guest engagement.
Tourismart offers a tablet-based management system, but with no available user ratings, we cannot accurately assess its ease of use. Its marketing suggests a focus on straightforward operations, but without reviews, it’s impossible to confirm how simple it is for your team to implement and adopt.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet boasts 12 unique features, including request management, room service ordering, guest profiles, local recommendations, mobile check-in/out, multilingual translations, payments, and guest messaging—covering a wide range of guest engagement tools.
Tourismart’s offering appears to focus on request handling via mobile and tablet, but lacks the breadth of features seen in Guestnet. It does not disclose additional functionalities, which raises questions about its capacity to replace or complement existing management systems.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet’s reviews highlight a customer support rating of 4.82/5, with feedback emphasizing helpful, responsive, and knowledgeable support teams that assist during onboarding and ongoing operations. Many users cite the support as a key factor in successful implementation.
Tourismart has no publicly available customer support ratings or reviews, making it impossible to gauge support quality. This absence is a significant drawback when considering long-term reliability and assistance.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet integrates with 20 verified partners, including notable PMS and booking systems like ASA Hotelsoftware, Mews, and Hotelkit. This extensive ecosystem facilitates smooth data exchange and automation across your hotel’s operational systems.
Tourismart currently has no verified integrations listed, which may limit its ability to connect with your existing systems. This could increase manual work and fragment your workflows.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet’s reviews primarily come from small to large hotels across multiple regions, with an overall rating of 4.74/5 for ease of use and 4.82/5 for support—these are recent and reflect high satisfaction. Hotels like PURS Fine Hotels and ULRICHSHOF report tangible operational and guest experience improvements.
Tourismart has no reviews, so there are no property ratings or segment-specific feedback. This makes Guestnet the clear frontrunner in proven hotel satisfaction.
Edge: Guestnet.
Guestnet’s pricing starts at $500 per month, with no free tier, trials, or additional implementation fees. Its straightforward subscription model offers transparency and predictable costs.
Tourismart’s pricing is not publicly disclosed, which complicates budgeting and comparison. The lack of clear pricing information can pose challenges for hotels seeking transparent cost structures.
Edge: Guestnet.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Guestnet is a mature, well-reviewed platform that excels in guest communication, automation, and integrations, making it suitable for hotels of all sizes. Its recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive feature set provide a strong foundation for reliable guest engagement and operational efficiency.
Tourismart markets itself as an all-in-one solution but lacks public review data and integration details, which casts doubt on its ability to deliver consistent results. Its focus on mobile and back-end management may appeal to smaller properties seeking a single platform but without proven customer feedback, its effectiveness remains unverified.
Choose Guestnet if you prioritize proven success, robust features, and excellent support. Consider Tourismart only if your hotel’s specific needs align precisely with its offerings and you are prepared for a higher risk due to limited publicly available validation.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
Tourismart
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Guestnet 和 Tourismart 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
Tourismart
|
|---|---|---|
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
| 当地推荐 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
| 请求管理 | ||
| 酒店目录 |
我们分析了 7 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"The tools allow us to reduce paper and manual workflows. At the same time, the optimized communication saves time that we can now invest directly in our guests."
Tourismart
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Guestnet allows us to provide guests with all important information 24/7, which significantly increases satisfaction. At the same time, the platform reduces our team’s workload thr..."
Tourismart
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel s... Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel staff. This feature is crucial for fast adoption and smooth operation, minimizing training time and error occurrence.
Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations... Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations, without the need for paper-based resources, enhancing operational efficiency.
许多评论者表示,通过 Guestnet 快速访问酒店服务和设施提高了客人的满意度,从而带来了积极的反馈,并有可能增加回头客的数量。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, wh... While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, which could be improved for a better experience.
评论者们对 Guestnet 与当地旅游数据和酒店管理系统的集成表示赞赏,但也有一些评论者提到希望进一步集成,以增强自动化并减少人工操作。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Guestnet 和 Tourismart 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Guestnet 提供 20 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Tourismart 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Guestnet 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Guestnet:否。Tourismart:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Guestnet 的 HT Score 为 96,Tourismart 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问