The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店预订软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #6 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #19 0 条评价 | #4 28 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #14 0 条评价 | #4 11 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #11 0 条评价 | #5 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #14 1 条评价 | #3 34 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #5 25 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #14 0 条评价 | #5 18 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #11 0 条评价 | #7 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #16 1 条评价 | #3 34 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #4 18 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #7 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #6 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel reservations software is critical for streamlining operations, driving direct bookings, and maximizing revenue. Both Vizergy (CRS) by Vizergy and SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) by SHR Group aim to fulfill these needs but diverge significantly in execution, support, and market presence. Vizergy’s near-total absence of recent reviews and a very low rating signal a lack of current relevance, while SHR’s robust review count and recent positive feedback strongly suggest it’s the more reliable choice today.
Are you prioritizing a proven, well-supported platform with extensive features and a broad hotel segment reach? Or are you considering a solution that’s largely untested in recent months? The answer leans heavily toward SHR Group.
Both Vizergy and SHR Group aim to simplify reservation management, but they do so with very different market traction and review profiles. Vizergy’s single review over the past two years, with a 0/5 rating and 0 recent reviews, indicates a product that’s likely no longer actively supported or trusted by hoteliers. Conversely, SHR Group boasts 49 reviews, all recent, and a high overall rating of 4.77/5, with a 93% likelihood to recommend, signaling a product with ongoing support and user satisfaction.
While Vizergy is advertised as a leader in digital marketing and website development, its core reservation platform appears outdated or unsupported, based on user feedback. SHR Group, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive CRS with 20 unique features, including advanced distribution management, revenue controls, and integrations, making it a more complete reservation solution.
Are you looking for a platform that actively evolves with industry needs? Or one that has been left behind? The evidence favors SHR Group.
If your hotel needs a reservation system with a strong track record, extensive integrations, and dedicated support, SHR Group clearly outperforms Vizergy. SHR’s platform is trusted by a variety of hotel segments—independent, branded, boutique, casino, and resort hotels—and has a substantial presence across multiple regions.
In contrast, Vizergy’s limited or nonexistent recent reviews and a sole, highly negative review cast doubt on its current viability. If your property relies heavily on reliable distribution, revenue management, and seamless integrations, SHR is the safer, more proven option. For hotels seeking a modern, supported platform with broad functionality, SHR is the clear recommendation.
User experience is a key factor, especially for staff adoption and daily use. SHR Group’s platform has a 4.61/5 ease-of-use rating, with reviewers describing it as “not cumbersome,” “very user-friendly,” and “easy to navigate,” despite some minor quirks with menu navigation. Support from SHR is consistently praised, with a 4.76/5 rating and comments about prompt, helpful assistance.
Vizergy receives a much lower 2/5 rating for ease of use, with reviews criticizing its limited editing capabilities, complicated website management, and poor SEO performance. Its outdated interface and lack of recent support make it unlikely your team would find it intuitive or reliable.
Edge: SHR Group.
SHR Group offers 20 features unique to its platform, including reporting dashboards, guest profiles, channel management, metasearch connectivity, PMS and RMS integrations, dynamic pricing, and more. These features enable robust distribution, revenue optimization, and detailed guest insights, supporting a modern hotel operation.
Vizergy, by contrast, has no listed features beyond basic website design and marketing, and its website builder is limited, with no mention of advanced reservation or distribution capabilities. The lack of feature depth and recent updates makes SHR the clear winner here.
Edge: SHR Group.
Customer support and onboarding are critical, especially with complex reservation systems. SHR Group’s support scores (4.76/5) and reviews emphasize personalized, prompt assistance that helps hotels optimize their systems and resolve issues quickly. Many reviewers praise the support team’s industry expertise and ongoing engagement.
Vizergy’s ratings (2/5) and reviews reveal a lack of recent support, with customers frustrated by unresponsive service, generic answers, and poor follow-through. Given the importance of ongoing support, SHR is the better choice.
Edge: SHR Group.
Integration capabilities are vital for streamlining operations. SHR Group’s platform connects with 81 verified partners, including CRITON, Priority Software, Visual Matrix PMS, and many others, covering PMS, RMS, CRM, and payment systems. This extensive partner network simplifies hotel tech ecosystems.
Vizergy’s integrations are nonexistent or unverified, which limits its utility in today’s multi-channel environment. For reliable, scalable operations, SHR’s extensive integrations give it a decisive edge.
Edge: SHR Group.
No recent reviews exist for Vizergy, making it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction. SHR Group, on the other hand, has 49 reviews, with an overall rating of 4.77/5, and consistently high scores from various hotel segments.
Hotels rated SHR especially highly for independent, branded, and boutique properties, with 4.75-4.88/5 ratings amid recent reviews. This consistent positive feedback underpins SHR’s reputation for quality.
Edge: SHR Group.
Both products lack transparent pricing details, which suggests custom quotes based on hotel size and requirements. However, given Vizergy’s history of high monthly fees and overpromising, it’s likely more expensive or less cost-effective than SHR, which offers a comprehensive platform without explicit charges.
Since both are "no trial" and lack detailed pricing, your best move is to request quotes, but SHR’s broad feature set and recent positive reviews imply it offers more value for money.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that SHR Group offers a full, supported, and constantly evolving CRS platform, while Vizergy appears outdated, unsupported, and limited in features. SHR’s extensive integrations, recent user reviews, and high satisfaction ratings make it the clear choice for hotels seeking operational efficiency and revenue growth.
If your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich reservation system backed by ongoing support, choose SHR. It’s designed for today’s hotel environment and has proven its value with recent, positive user experiences.
Choose Vizergy only if you’re seeking a basic web presence and are willing to accept a lack of ongoing support, limited functionality, and possible system obsolescence. For most hoteliers, SHR Group is the smarter, safer investment.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
SHR 的客户成功团队经常被称赞为杰出,提供主动和定制的支持。这种级别的服务有助于处理日常咨询和重大项目,大大简化了酒店运营的管理。
SHR 的系统(尤其是 CRS 和 CRO)经常被描述为用户友好且易于操作。这种易用性有助于提高运营效率并加快新用户的入门速度。
无缝集成第三方系统(如 PMS 和其他酒店管理工具)是 SHR 的一大优势。用户认为这对于顺畅运营和高效管理至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论提到,SHR 系统需要提供更广泛、更方便用户使用的报告选项。这包括临时分析功能和对关键指标的更详细洞察。
一些用户表示希望获得更全面的基于云的体验,以最大限度地减少升级期间的停机时间。这将使 SHR 符合现代技术趋势并提高系统可用性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Vizergy (CRS) 和 SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) 共享许多核心 Hotel Reservations Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Vizergy (CRS) 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) 提供 81 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 2.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Vizergy (CRS):否。SHR Central Reservation System (CRS):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Reservations Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Vizergy 的 HT Score 为 0,SHR Group 的为 49。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问