The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | 1Day |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #6 83 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #6 93 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #6 27 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #12 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | 1Day |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #6 75 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #6 63 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #6 37 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #7 21 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | 1Day |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #30 3 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #5 180 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #8 27 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #18 3 条评价 |
Choosing the right channel management platform for your hotel hinges on your specific needs and the features you value most. Both 1Day by 1Day and D-EDGE aim to streamline distribution, but they serve vastly different markets and offer different levels of sophistication. D-EDGE, with its extensive features and broad market presence, is clearly the more established choice, especially given its recent reviews and larger user base.
However, 1Day, despite its minimal review footprint and zero ratings, appears to lack the depth and functionality that hoteliers now expect from a channel manager. The core question remains: which platform will support your hotel’s growth and operational efficiency?
1Day by 1Day is, frankly, not a viable option given its zero reviews and complete absence of recent user feedback. It seems to be an incomplete or non-operational product, offering no verified features, integrations, or customer support data.
Conversely, D-EDGE has a well-documented presence across 34 countries, with over 200 recent reviews, nearly all highly positive—92% likelihood to recommend—indicating a proven track record. The platform’s 4.64/5 overall rating and ease of use score of 4.65/5 reflect a mature, trusted system that hoteliers rely on daily.
This stark contrast makes it clear: D-EDGE is the dominant, more reliable choice. The question is, can 1Day even meet your needs?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, scalable platform with proven integration, analytics, and support, go with D-EDGE. Its extensive capabilities—like PMS connectivity, multi-channel distribution, and marketing dashboards—are essential for hotels aiming to optimize revenue and streamline operations.
If your hotel only requires a basic, perhaps even non-functional solution, or if you are exploring options with no immediate need for advanced features, 1Day might seem tempting. But with zero recent reviews or data, it’s unlikely this option will support your growth or operational complexity.
Most hoteliers looking for a trusted, comprehensive channel manager should choose D-EDGE. Its recent reviews and solid ratings make it the clear winner for hotels seeking reliability and extensive feature sets.
D-EDGE scores 4.65/5 for ease of use, with users praising its intuitive interface, straightforward navigation, and quick onboarding process, supported by a 4.48/5 onboarding rating. Customers highlight how easy it is to handle rates, availability, and integrations, even for staff unfamiliar with complex systems.
In stark contrast, 1Day scores a 0/5 across all user experience metrics, with no reviews to support usability claims. Its complete lack of user feedback indicates it’s either non-operational or untested, making it impossible to assess.
Edge: D-EDGE.
D-EDGE boasts 19 distinct features, including PMS connectivity, meta search marketing, inventory management, multi-currency support, multi-lingual interface, and advanced yield rules—features that directly impact revenue and operational agility. Customers acknowledge its ability to handle complex rate and availability adjustments, analytics, and automation.
1Day offers no verifiable features, with zero unique functionalities documented. Its absence of integrations and advanced tools means it cannot compete in the modern hotel distribution landscape.
Edge: D-EDGE.
D-EDGE maintains a support rating of 4.55/5, with users noting fast, competent assistance and proactive account management. Testimonials mention reliable support that helps hotels handle rate updates, resolve issues quickly, and optimize their distribution.
1Day has no reviews or support data available, which suggests a lack of established support channels or a non-operational platform. Without recent user feedback, it’s impossible to determine support quality.
Edge: D-EDGE.
D-EDGE offers 115 verified integrations, connecting your hotel to over 300 OTAs, GDSs, and other distribution channels, including partners like Hospitality Software Development Services, RevControl, and Mirai. This extensive network ensures your hotel can reach most markets efficiently.
1Day has no verified integrations, limiting its capacity to connect with distribution channels or PMS systems. Its lack of integration options severely hampers its viability for hotels with complex distribution needs.
Edge: D-EDGE.
D-EDGE’s recent reviews reflect a 4.64/5 rating, with users from various segments—independent, branded, luxury—expressing high satisfaction. The platform’s features, support, and ease of use are consistently praised, contributing to a strong reputation.
1Day has no reviews or recent data, so it cannot be rated or compared in terms of hoteliers’ satisfaction or trust.
Edge: D-EDGE.
Pricing details for 1Day are unavailable, and given its lack of recent reviews, it’s likely not commercially active. D-EDGE does not list explicit prices but operates on a custom pricing model, with no implementation fees or freemium options.
For hotels needing transparency and value, D-EDGE’s flexible, enterprise-level approach, combined with its extensive feature set, justifies its cost compared to a non-verified product like 1Day.
Given the complete lack of recent data, 1Day is suitable only for very basic, experimental use cases—not for operational hotels looking to optimize distribution.
Again, the lack of verifiable features or reviews makes 1Day unsuitable for most operational hotels.
The core difference is that D-EDGE offers a comprehensive, well-supported, and extensively integrated platform that hotel operators can rely on daily. 1Day, by contrast, appears incomplete or inactive, providing no credible features, integrations, or recent data, making it unfit for any serious hotel operation.
Choose D-EDGE if your hotel needs a trustworthy, scalable solution that supports growth, automation, and analytics. Its large user base, recent positive reviews, and extensive functionality make it the clear winner.
Opt for 1Day only if you are testing basic concepts or have extremely minimal distribution needs—though the lack of recent reviews and data suggests it’s not a viable long-term solution. For most hotels, D-EDGE represents the smarter, more reliable investment.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然 D-Edge 在账户管理和支持服务方面普遍获得了积极的反馈,但一些用户指出响应时间较慢,尤其是在旺季。有人建议提供更多在线培训资源和视频,以帮助用户更有... 虽然 D-Edge 在账户管理和支持服务方面普遍获得了积极的反馈,但一些用户指出响应时间较慢,尤其是在旺季。有人建议提供更多在线培训资源和视频,以帮助用户更有效地使用复杂功能。
渠道管理器因其简单易用、实时同步和与众多 OTA 的广泛连接而受到称赞。该平台使用户能够通过单一界面轻松管理多个酒店。然而,一些人指出,需要改进自我映射功... 渠道管理器因其简单易用、实时同步和与众多 OTA 的广泛连接而受到称赞。该平台使用户能够通过单一界面轻松管理多个酒店。然而,一些人指出,需要改进自我映射功能并更快地更新费率变化。
用户对 D-Edge 高效处理费率和库存的能力表示赞赏,它让定价策略的更新和管理变得十分轻松。该功能大大减少了手动更新所花费的时间,并有助于避免超额预订,使该... 用户对 D-Edge 高效处理费率和库存的能力表示赞赏,它让定价策略的更新和管理变得十分轻松。该功能大大减少了手动更新所花费的时间,并有助于避免超额预订,使该平台适合实时调整费率并最大程度地减少错误。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
自我映射被强调为需要改进的领域。一些用户指出映射新通道存在困难,并建议使此过程更加用户友好且不易出错。在无需支持干预的情况下提高自我映射管理的自主性是... 自我映射被强调为需要改进的领域。一些用户指出映射新通道存在困难,并建议使此过程更加用户友好且不易出错。在无需支持干预的情况下提高自我映射管理的自主性是一个常见的要求。
用户提到,尽管 Little Yielder 工具具有创新性,可帮助自动管理房价,但仍有改进空间。建议包括增加更多功能,例如在空房增加时重新开放房价,以及整合更多动态... 用户提到,尽管 Little Yielder 工具具有创新性,可帮助自动管理房价,但仍有改进空间。建议包括增加更多功能,例如在空房增加时重新开放房价,以及整合更多动态定价选项。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。1day 和 D-EDGE - Smart Channel Manager 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。1day 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 D-EDGE - Smart Channel Manager 提供 115 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。D-EDGE - Smart Channel Manager 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
1day:否。D-EDGE - Smart Channel Manager:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。1Day 的 HT Score 为 0,D-Edge 的为 72。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问