The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 592 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 212 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 42 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #13 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 473 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #4 228 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #6 116 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #2 93 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #2 435 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #7 163 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #3 226 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #7 11 条评价 |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your hotel’s priorities—ease of use, features, support, and scalability—must guide the decision. 3RPMS and Cloudbeds PMS aim to streamline operations, but they approach this goal very differently.
3RPMS promises an all-in-one cloud platform tailored by hoteliers for hoteliers, emphasizing simplicity and real human support. Cloudbeds, meanwhile, positions itself as a global growth engine, integrating extensive features, third-party apps, and AI-driven insights. Which system aligns best with your hotel’s current needs and future ambitions?
3RPMS offers a streamlined, intuitive experience designed for hotels that want to minimize complexity and reliance on lengthy onboarding. Its core strengths are centralized management and automated workflows, but it has a glaring weakness: zero reviews, ratings, or recent user feedback, which casts doubt on its current reliability and development.
Cloudbeds, on the other hand, boasts over 1,071 reviews, with recent data from the last six months showing 81 reviews—significantly more recent and abundant. Its 4.63/5 overall rating and 4.61/5 ease of use demonstrate sustained user satisfaction. The vast number of reviews indicates a mature, widely adopted platform that adapts to diverse property types.
Given the more recent reviews and higher engagement, Cloudbeds clearly stands as the more trusted and proven choice. If you’re looking for a system with real-world validation, Cloudbeds’s data-backed reputation outshines 3RPMS.
If your hotel needs a full-featured ecosystem that tightly integrates reservation management, distribution, revenue tools, and guest engagement, Cloudbeds is the clear winner. Its extensive feature set (33 unique features) and 190 verified integrations make it suitable for properties seeking growth and operational efficiency.
Conversely, if your hotel values simplicity, minimal setup, and a focus on centralized management without extensive third-party integrations, 3RPMS might seem appealing. However, in the absence of recent reviews or proven user feedback, Cloudbeds’s robust ecosystem offers more confidence for hotels aiming to scale or improve operational complexity.
For most hoteliers, especially those looking to grow or optimize multiple channels, Cloudbeds’s comprehensive ecosystem makes it the better fit.
Cloudbeds’s user interface consistently earns a 4.61/5 rating, with many reviews praising its intuitive, mobile-friendly design. Support and onboarding are rated at 4.45/5, with users noting that the platform is easy for staff to learn and adopt, even across multiple properties.
In comparison, 3RPMS scores a 0/5 in ease of use, with no recent reviews or user feedback to validate its usability. The lack of demonstrated support or user testimonials makes it impossible to assess its onboarding experience or interface design.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers 33 distinct features, including a channel manager, revenue management, guest messaging, booking engine, and integrations with 190 partners—covering nearly every aspect of hotel operations. Its features are designed for growth, automation, and guest engagement, with advanced modules like multi-lingual support, online check-in, and analytics dashboards.
3RPMS claims to be a modern, all-in-one cloud solution but offers zero features in its description or user reviews, making it impossible to compare directly. The absence of detailed features raises doubts about its capabilities.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s support team scores 4.41/5, with reviews highlighting prompt, empathetic, and effective assistance. Many users mention that Cloudbeds’s support has been instrumental in onboarding and troubleshooting, with some stating, “Cloudbeds support is quick and reliable, making implementation smooth,” and others appreciating their ongoing responsiveness.
There are no recent reviews or ratings for 3RPMS, so their customer support quality remains unverified. This lack of feedback diminishes confidence in their post-sale service.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified integrations, including popular partners like SiteMinder, Stripe, and Trevo. Its extensive marketplace supports scalability and customization, enabling properties to connect reservation systems, payment gateways, CRM, and more, often via two-way, real-time data exchange.
3RPMS lists only 12 verified partners, with no details on integration depth or variety. This limited ecosystem could hinder growth or automation for properties needing diverse system connectivity.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s reviews show a high level of satisfaction across multiple segments, including boutique hotels, hostels, and independent properties, with an overall rating of 4.63/5. Recent reviews highlight its ease of use, support, and features, with many users noting marked operational improvements and revenue growth.
In contrast, 3RPMS has no reviews, scores, or user feedback available, making it impossible to gauge satisfaction levels or property-specific ratings.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s pricing starts at $600/month, with no free tier or trial details specified. Its pricing structure reflects its extensive features and global support, making it a significant investment but justified for scalable, growth-oriented properties.
3RPMS’s pricing information is unavailable, with no details about licensing, monthly fees, or setup costs. The absence of pricing data makes it difficult to evaluate value or compare ROI accurately.
Due to the lack of recent reviews, make sure you verify their support and stability before committing.
Cloudbeds is especially suitable if growth and operational efficiency are key priorities.
Cloudbeds stands out as the more established, well-reviewed, and feature-rich property management platform. Its extensive integration ecosystem, high user ratings, and recent, abundant reviews give hoteliers confidence in its ability to support growth and operational excellence.
3RPMS offers a simplified, all-in-one solution that might appeal to small hotels seeking ease, but the lack of recent validation makes it a risky choice unless you can verify ongoing support and stability.
For hotels aiming to scale, improve efficiency, and harness a broad ecosystem, Cloudbeds remains the recommended option. If your focus is on minimal complexity and quick setup without needing extensive integrations, 3RPMS could be worth exploring—but proceed cautiously with limited feedback.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住... Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住/退房流程。
Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更... Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更顺利地过渡。
Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并... Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并实现了实时同步运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它... Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它非常实用。
尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用... 尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用户中是一个普遍存在的问题。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。3RPMS 和 Cloudbeds PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。3RPMS 提供 13 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Cloudbeds PMS 提供 189 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Cloudbeds PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
3RPMS:否。Cloudbeds PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。3RPMS 的 HT Score 为 0,Cloudbeds 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问