The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,613 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 用户友好界面 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Employee Messaging.
Stayntouch 表现出色 在 用户友好界面 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) .
基于 HTR 上 1,613 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 1,242 | 371 |
在分析了 1,613 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 用户友好界面, 实施与支持, 一体化生态系统,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 整合与入职, 系统性能和可靠性, 云和移动集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
+
整合与入职
▾
|
|
+
实施与支持
▾
|
+
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
|
+
一体化生态系统
▾
|
+
云和移动集成
▾
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报表定制
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
−
客房管理和客房服务
▾
|
|
−
移动和云集成
▾
|
−
费率和收益管理
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 592 条评价 | #18 51 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 212 条评价 | #5 208 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 42 条评价 | #7 29 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #13 4 条评价 | #2 58 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 473 条评价 | #6 220 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 228 条评价 | #6 180 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 116 条评价 | #3 152 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 93 条评价 | #14 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 435 条评价 | #4 262 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 163 条评价 | #12 64 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 226 条评价 | #21 3 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS by Cloudbeds and Stayntouch PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but Cloudbeds leans toward an all-in-one platform with extensive integrations, while Stayntouch emphasizes simplicity, mobility, and multi-property management. Which features resonate most with your team’s current challenges and future plans?
Cloudbeds’ larger user base, more recent reviews, and higher overall ratings suggest it’s the more trusted choice among hoteliers actively seeking scalable solutions. Do you want a more comprehensive ecosystem or a straightforward, mobile-centric property management system?
Cloudbeds offers a unified platform combining PMS, channel management, booking engine, and additional modules like analytics and POS. Stayntouch also covers core PMS functionalities but emphasizes a user-friendly, mobile interface designed for quick adoption and multi-property oversight.
Both systems support multi-property management, but Cloudbeds' extensive integrations with 190 verified partners and over 49 shared features provide more flexibility for complex operations. Stayntouch, with 188 verified integrations and a focus on guest experience, may appeal more to hotels prioritizing ease of use and contactless solutions. Which aligns better with your operational complexity?
If your hotel needs an all-in-one growth engine that connects reservations, distribution, and guest management in one ecosystem, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its features like inventory management, native email marketing, and a robust analytics dashboard are tailored for ambitious properties seeking scale.
If your team values simplicity, mobility, and efficient multi-property management without needing extensive customization, Stayntouch provides an intuitive interface with mobile-first design and seamless onboarding. Larger chains or multi-property groups aiming to modernize operations should lean toward Stayntouch, while independent or boutique hotels needing deep integrations should opt for Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds boasts a 4.61/5 ease-of-use rating, with many users citing its intuitive, streamlined interface that helps staff manage reservations, housekeeping, and revenue with minimal training. Its onboarding is rated 4.45/5, although some note initial setup complexity.
Stayntouch excels slightly with a 4.7/5 rating for ease of use, praised for its mobile-friendly screens and quick staff adoption. Its onboarding is rated 4.58/5, with users highlighting effective training and straightforward navigation. Edge: Stayntouch.
Cloudbeds offers 49 core features plus 15 unique to its platform, including PMS connectivity, advanced analytics, inventory management, native email marketing, and a wellness module. These extend its capabilities beyond basic PMS functions, supporting revenue growth and operational control.
Stayntouch provides a solid set of core PMS features but does not list additional unique modules. While it excels in reservation management and mobile access, it lacks some of Cloudbeds’ advanced operational tools. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’ support ratings stand at 4.41/5, with many users praising its responsiveness and helpfulness, though some mention occasional delays during peak times. Support reviews cite quick resolution and empathetic service as key strengths.
Stayntouch outperforms slightly with a 4.68/5 customer support rating, with reviews emphasizing friendly, knowledgeable support and effective onboarding. Users report faster resolution times and personalized assistance. Edge: Stayntouch.
Cloudbeds lists 190 verified partners, with 71 shared integrations with Stayntouch. Its integrations span booking channels, payment providers, and operational tools like email marketing and POS.
Stayntouch provides 188 verified integrations, including key third-party systems like RoomPriceGenie and STAAH, with a focus on seamless multi-property management. While their totals are close, Cloudbeds’ broader partner network and extensive marketplace give it a slight edge. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds has a slightly higher overall rating of 4.63/5, with recent reviews emphasizing its comprehensive features and reliability. Its larger review count (1071 reviews, 81 recent) offers a broader snapshot of user satisfaction across diverse hotel types.
Stayntouch’s rating is 4.56/5, with fewer reviews but consistently high recent scores, especially among boutique and multi-property operators. Its recent reviews highlight ease of use and excellent support. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds charges a starting price of $600/month, with no trial or implementation fees, and offers a flat subscription model. Stayntouch’s base price is $800/month, also with no additional implementation or setup fees.
Both are premium solutions, but Cloudbeds’ lower starting cost makes it more accessible for smaller properties or those just beginning digital transformation.
Not ideal if your hotel has very simple needs or prefers a lightweight system without extensive modules.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on custom integrations or needs comprehensive advanced analytics beyond core PMS functions.
Cloudbeds is the more robust choice for ambitious hotels seeking a full-service, scalable platform that integrates operations, marketing, and distribution. Its extensive features and larger review base reflect its proven track record in diverse property types.
Stayntouch excels in simplicity, mobile-first design, and support, making it ideal for multi-property groups that prioritize ease of use and quick deployment. Its recent reviews confirm it’s the preferred choice for high support quality and intuitive operation.
When to choose Cloudbeds:
When to choose Stayntouch:
In conclusion, Cloudbeds’ larger recent review count and slightly higher ratings make it the more reliable choice for most hotels aiming to scale. Stayntouch remains a compelling option for properties emphasizing mobility and support in a streamlined package.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Cloudbeds PMS 和 Stayntouch 共享 49 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
| 分析仪表板 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 无限频道(无需额外费用) |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 3 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 13 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住... Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住/退房流程。
Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更... Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更顺利地过渡。
Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并... Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并实现了实时同步运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它... Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它非常实用。
尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用... 尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用户中是一个普遍存在的问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该系统直观的设计便于操作,非常适合快速培训新员工。其醒目的视觉和组织元素有助于加快任务执行速度,提升员工能力,从而改善与顾客的互动体验。
Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设... Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设置方面。
Stayntouch 的服务总体可靠,很少出现重大故障,并通过云端提供持续支持。尽管总体评价良好,但一些用户也对公司快速发展背景下解决复杂问题的速度表示担忧。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然用户普遍称赞其易于访问且支持运营的报告,但他们也指出需要更具适应性的报告功能。一些报告缺乏细节或难以操作,凸显了可定制分析解决方案的必要性。
客房分配和客房服务功能因提升运营效率而获得积极反馈。然而,用户希望客房日志查看和任务安排功能能够得到改进,以满足特定的管理需求。
排名更高的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch 提供 187 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Stayntouch 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds PMS:否。Stayntouch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Stayntouch 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问