The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 1,570 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 功能丰富, 运营效率, 响应式支持和定期更新,而 Cloudbeds 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 实施与支持, 一体化生态系统。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
功能丰富
▾
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
+
实施与支持
▾
|
|
+
响应式支持和定期更新
▾
|
+
一体化生态系统
▾
|
|
+
易于培训使用
▾
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误消息
▾
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
−
报表定制
▾
|
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 117 条评价 | #1 592 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 157 条评价 | #4 212 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 9 条评价 | #5 42 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 5 条评价 | #13 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 165 条评价 | #2 473 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 80 条评价 | #4 228 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 62 条评价 | #6 116 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #9 27 条评价 | #2 93 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 30 条评价 | #2 435 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 228 条评价 | #7 163 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 13 条评价 | #3 226 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #17 2 条评价 | #7 11 条评价 |
Choosing the right PMS is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth. You’re comparing Clock PMS and Cloudbeds PMS, two prominent cloud-based solutions with distinct strengths. Both aim to streamline your daily tasks, but their feature sets, support, and user feedback differ significantly. Which system best aligns with your hotel’s specific needs?
Clock PMS offers a more specialized, feature-rich platform focused on operational control, while Cloudbeds emphasizes integration, ease of use, and scalability. Do you prioritize comprehensive features or a simplified, scalable system?
Both Clock PMS and Cloudbeds are designed to manage reservations, rates, invoicing, and front desk operations. Clock PMS delivers a detailed, feature-packed system with added modules like guest profiles, multi-currency, and gift vouchers, while Cloudbeds offers an all-in-one ecosystem combining PMS, channel management, and booking engine.
Clock’s strengths lie in its depth of functionalities, especially for properties seeking extensive customization and multi-channel control. Cloudbeds simplifies complex operations with an intuitive interface and extensive integrations, making it easier for hotels to manage multiple aspects without overwhelming staff. Which approach suits your hotel’s complexity and staff expertise?
Clock PMS has a higher overall rating (4.8/5) supported by 251 recent reviews, with a focus on operational control and automation. Cloudbeds, with a broader user base of over 1,071 reviews and a slightly lower rating (4.63/5), excels in seamless integrations and user-friendliness. The more recent reviews favor Cloudbeds’ ease of use and support, indicating a current advantage in user experience.
If your hotel requires a highly customizable, feature-rich PMS capable of managing complex operations, Clock PMS is the better fit. It’s ideal for properties that want detailed guest profiles, multi-currency support, and specialized modules like gift vouchers and event bookings.
On the other hand, if your hotel prioritizes quick onboarding, smooth integrations, and scalable solutions, Cloudbeds is preferable. It suits properties looking for an easy-to-navigate platform with robust channel management, a flexible booking engine, and extensive partner integrations.
For boutique hotels or properties with a diverse portfolio, Cloudbeds’ ease of use and support make it a strong choice. Large or complex operations needing detailed control and automation may find Clock PMS’s depth more advantageous.
Clock PMS scores a 4.78/5 for ease of use and boasts a user-friendly interface praised for onboarding and staff adoption. Recent reviews highlight that new employees find Clock’s interface intuitive, speeding up staff training and daily operations.
Cloudbeds also scores highly, with a 4.61/5 rating, and is lauded for its straightforward, mobile-friendly interface. Users frequently mention how quickly they can navigate and perform essential tasks, reducing training time and errors.
Edge: Clock PMS. Its higher recent ratings and specific praise for onboarding make Clock slightly easier for staff to master initially.
Clock PMS offers unique features like multi-currency management, multilingual support, guest profiles, and gift vouchers—features only Clock provides among these options. It boasts a total of 58 exclusive features, including automated invoicing, event bookings, and restaurant POS integration.
Cloudbeds, however, has a broader feature set with 10 additional functionalities, such as comprehensive analytics dashboards, inventory management, and spa modules. Its strength lies in its extensive integrations, multi-channel management, and flexible booking engine.
The clear edge in features depends on your property’s needs: Clock’s specialized modules or Cloudbeds’ extensive ecosystem. Overall, Cloudbeds’s broader feature set and marketplace integrations give it the edge.
Edge: Cloudbeds. Its larger suite of functionalities and integration options provide more comprehensive management tools.
Clock PMS reviews emphasize its support team’s responsiveness, with users praising timely assistance and proactive updates. Recent feedback mentions staff being efficient and helpful, with a support score of 4.75/5.
Cloudbeds’ support ratings are slightly lower at 4.41/5, but users still commend its responsiveness and helpful resources. However, some reviews express frustration over slower support during peak times.
Edge: Clock PMS. Its higher support rating and recent positive reviews make it the more reliable choice for ongoing assistance.
Cloudbeds has a notable advantage with 190 verified partners, compared to Clock’s 111, reflecting its more extensive ecosystem. Both share 58 common integrations, including popular partners like RevControl, Fairmas, and RoomChecking.
Clock’s exclusive integrations focus on niche applications such as Profitroom and Lybra Tech, while Cloudbeds offers integrations with a wide array of booking channels, payment gateways, and third-party tools like AdsHotel and WebRezPro.
If broad connectivity is a priority, Cloudbeds’s larger partner network provides more flexibility and options.
Edge: Cloudbeds. Its greater number of verified integrations enables more customization and scalability.
Clock PMS’s recent reviews show an average rating of 4.8/5, with very high ratings from boutique and independent hotels. Over 90% of Clock users would recommend it, especially for properties needing detailed control.
Cloudbeds’s overall rating is 4.63/5, with a strong rating from larger, multi-property operators. Recent reviews praise its ease of use, speed, and support, but some hotel segments rate it slightly lower.
For property-specific ratings, Clock’s recent review volume and higher scores give it a slight edge in user satisfaction.
Edge: Clock PMS. Its higher recent ratings and recommendation rate make it the preferred choice for hoteliers valuing detailed control and reliability.
Both Clock PMS and Cloudbeds are priced at $600 per month, with no additional implementation or hidden fees. Neither offers a freemium model, and both provide a flat monthly fee regardless of property size.
Your choice may come down to value perceived in features, support, and scalability rather than price, as both options are comparable on cost.
Clock’s depth is best suited for larger or more complex hotels needing comprehensive management tools to streamline operations.
Cloudbeds is perfect for boutique hotels, hostels, or multi-property groups looking for scalability and ease of management.
Clock PMS offers a feature-rich, highly customizable platform designed for properties with complex needs. Its strengths in automation, guest profiles, and multi-currency management give it an edge for larger or more sophisticated hotels.
Choose Clock PMS if you want detailed control, extensive modules, and a well-supported system tailored to complex operations. Its higher recent ratings and reviews reinforce its position as a reliable, powerful PMS.
Cloudbeds, however, excels in its simplicity, broad integrations, and user-friendly design, making it ideal for properties prioritizing fast onboarding and scalability. Its extensive marketplace and support network provide flexibility for growing or multi-property hotels.
If your hotel demands deep customization and operational control, Clock PMS is your best choice. For ease, speed, and wide connectivity, Cloudbeds is the smarter pick.
Edge: Clock PMS. Its detailed functionality and recent review scores favor hotels needing comprehensive operational control.
Edge: Cloudbeds. Its extensive integrations and user-friendly design make it ideal for scalable, multi-property management.
我们分析了 14 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ 提供丰富的功能,有助于管理酒店运营和活动。然而,一些用户发现功能繁多,难以管理,建议改进其组织方式。
该软件通过节省时间并简化部门之间的沟通和协调,显著提高了运营效率,为员工和客人带来更顺畅的体验。
用户对响应式支持服务和定期更新表示赞赏,这些更新引入了新功能和改进,确保了系统的可靠性和与用户需求的相关性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户偶尔会遇到以代码形式显示的错误消息,这让他们难以快速解决问题。直接从错误消息导航到问题可以提升用户体验。
报告功能虽然全面,但速度较慢,限制了其目前的有效性。用户建议进行优化,以解锁更多强大的功能。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住... Cloudbeds 因其直观且布局清晰的界面而备受赞誉,所有员工均可轻松上手,从而减少了对大量培训的需求。这种易用性对于日常运营尤为有利,例如管理预订和执行入住/退房流程。
Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更... Cloudbeds 的实施流程和后续支持褒贬不一。虽然其客户服务通常因其响应速度和协助性而获得高分,但要实现移动端和集成功能的完全一致,还需要更全面的支持才能更顺利地过渡。
Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并... Cloudbeds 通过将酒店管理系统 (PMS)、渠道管理和预订引擎集成于同一平台,提供了一套全面的解决方案。这减少了对多个系统的需求,最大限度地减少了人工操作,并实现了实时同步运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它... Cloudbeds的预订流程简单高效,尤其是在入住和退房方面。这一特性大大减轻了管理负担,减少了错误,并提高了整体运营效率。系统的拖放功能尤其值得一提,因为它非常实用。
尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用... 尽管 Cloudbeds 提供了强大的报表功能,但用户指出,其定制化程度不够高,因为量身定制的管理洞察对于战略决策至关重要。这在寻求更深入的分析和可视化功能的用户中是一个普遍存在的问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock PMS 和 Cloudbeds PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock PMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Cloudbeds PMS 提供 189 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock PMS:否。Cloudbeds PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 84,Cloudbeds 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问