The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 23 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Adyen 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments and Recurring Payments.
roommaster 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 .
基于 HTR 上 23 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 23 |
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 支付处理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #7 0 条评价 | #2 6 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #10 0 条评价 | #3 7 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #4 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #4 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #9 0 条评价 | #4 7 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #7 0 条评价 | #5 0 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #4 1 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #4 0 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #4 14 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | #6 0 条评价 | #5 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #2 0 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | — | #3 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Adyen and roommaster Payments hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for payment processing. Both aim to facilitate transactions efficiently, but they diverge significantly in scope, integrations, user experience, and customer feedback. Adyen offers a broad, global platform with extensive features and a sizeable, recent review base, while roommaster Payments presents a highly rated, more hotel-centric solution. Your decision should reflect whether you prioritize a widespread provider or a specialized, user-friendly system.
Adyen is a global payments platform that connects directly to major card networks and supports multiple local payment methods, making it ideal for hotels with international guests or those expanding internationally. However, it currently lacks any reviews or ratings, leaving hotel operators unsure about its real-world performance in the hotel industry.
roommaster Payments, by contrast, boasts 20 recent reviews with a 4.45/5 customer support rating and a 8.4/10 NPS score, showing high user satisfaction. Its reviews focus on ease of use, staff support, and operational efficiency, making it a trusted choice for hotels seeking reliable, straightforward payments processing. Does this mean roommaster Payments offers a more tested, hotel-specific experience?
If your hotel needs a payment system tightly integrated within your property management environment, and your staff value ease of use and support, go with roommaster Payments. Its high review scores, detailed user feedback, and specific focus on hospitality workflows make it a safe choice for hotels prioritizing operational simplicity.
On the other hand, if your hotel requires a global, multi-channel payments infrastructure capable of supporting international transactions, multiple currencies, and advanced payment methods like Apple Pay, Alipay, and WeChatPay, Adyen is a better fit. Its extensive feature set and broad partner network suggest it’s suited for hotels with complex, multi-market payment needs.
roommaster Payments shines in ease of use, with a 4.4/5 rating from users who describe its interface as intuitive and accessible. Its staff report that onboarding is straightforward, and daily operations—deposit handling, reconciliation, and dispute management—are handled with minimal fuss.
Adyen, however, has a 0/5 usability rating and no recent reviews, making its user experience untested in the hotel sector. Given the lack of recent data, hotels should approach Adyen’s platform with caution regarding its operational practicality.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
Adyen offers 16 unique features, including multi-processor gateways, acceptance of numerous international payment methods like AliPay, WeChatPay, and Apple Pay, as well as advanced options like installment plans, recurring payments, and dynamic currency conversion. These features support complex, multi-country transactions.
roommaster Payments provides essential payment management features, including deposits, pre-authorizations, secure card storage, and automated reconciliation within the PMS. It does not list specialized features like multi-currency or alternative payment methods.
Edge: Adyen.
roommaster Payments has a proven support record with a 4.45/5 rating and an 8.4/10 NPS, with reviews praising their helpful staff and prompt issue resolution. Users mention responsive support, which is crucial during operational hiccups.
Adyen's support data is absent, with no reviews for recent performance or customer feedback. This lack of feedback suggests uncertainty regarding its support quality, especially in the hotel industry context.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments boasts 56 verified partners, including key industry players like Sage, Volo, and Cendyn, alongside shared partners such as Oracle Hospitality and Canary Technologies. Its integration breadth supports extensive hotel tech stacks.
Adyen has 46 verified partners, with notable integrations like Trevo, Kwentra, and ZUZU Hospitality Solutions, but fewer than roommaster. The broader integration network of roommaster indicates potentially easier connectivity with hotel-specific tools.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments dominates user reviews, with a 4.45/5 customer support score and an 8.4/10 NPS, reflecting high satisfaction among hotel clients, especially in independent and boutique hotels. Recent reviews praise its simplicity and support.
Adyen has no reviews or ratings, making its hotel industry reputation impossible to gauge. The absence of recent feedback suggests that, for now, roommaster’s experience is more trusted by hotel operators.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
Adyen does not list specific pricing details, which is typical for enterprise payment platforms. Its model might include custom quotes based on volume and features.
roommaster Payments charges a flat $300 monthly fee, with no mention of transaction-based costs. This transparency makes budgeting easier for hotels seeking predictable costs.
Note: Specific rates for Adyen are not publicly available, so direct comparison is limited.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers easy-to-use, hotel-specific payment systems with high support ratings or if you lack technical resources to handle a broad payment platform.
Not ideal if your hotel requires multi-currency support or advanced international payment features, which are more limited in roommaster Payments.
Adyen offers a comprehensive, globally scalable payments infrastructure with extensive features and a broad partner network. However, its lack of recent hotel-specific reviews makes its real-world performance uncertain for hotel operators.
roommaster Payments delivers a highly-rated, hotel-focused solution with excellent support, ease of use, and strong integration options, making it the safer choice for most hotels seeking reliable payment processing.
If your hotel’s priority is international transactions and multi-channel payments, Adyen is worth considering, provided you have the technical capacity to manage its complexity. Conversely, for hotels valuing simplicity, support, and proven user satisfaction, roommaster Payments is the clearer winner.
In conclusion, if recent reviews and user satisfaction matter most, roommaster Payments is the recommended option—its high support ratings and positive hotel-centric feedback demonstrate its effectiveness in hospitality environments.
支付处理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Adyen 和 roommaster Payments 共享 13 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 多处理器网关 | ||
| 接受万事达卡 | ||
| 接受发现 | ||
| 接受大来俱乐部 | ||
| 接受微信支付 | ||
| 接受美国运通 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 4 项功能存在差异。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Adyen 和 roommaster Payments 共享许多核心 Payments Processing Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Adyen 提供 46 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 roommaster Payments 提供 56 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。roommaster Payments 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.2/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Adyen:否。roommaster Payments:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Payments Processing Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Adyen 的 HT Score 为 0,roommaster 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案