The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 43 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Agilysys Hospitality Solutions 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Ciaobooking 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 43 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $1,000/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 43 | 0 |
在分析了 43 条经验证的评价后,Agilysys Hospitality Solutions 用户最看重其 用户友好型设计, 全面的功能, 定制和解决方案,而 Ciaobooking 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Ciaobooking |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好型设计
▾
|
|
|
+
全面的功能
▾
|
|
|
+
定制和解决方案
▾
|
|
|
+
培训支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
发展和支持问题
▾
|
|
|
−
System Integration
▾
|
|
|
−
成本效益
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Ciaobooking |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #54 2 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #41 9 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #25 4 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #6 11 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Ciaobooking |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #45 9 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #29 13 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #48 3 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Ciaobooking |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #21 24 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #27 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Agilysys PMS and Ciaobooking hinges on understanding your hotel’s needs, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Agilysys PMS is a mature, feature-rich solution designed for hotels seeking extensive integration and customization, while Ciaobooking appears more streamlined but lacks detailed review data and extensive features. The key question: does your team need a robust, proven property management system or a simpler, possibly less tested platform?
Both products aim to streamline operations—Agilysys with its comprehensive suite and Ciaobooking with its integrated automation. But Agilysys's extensive feature set and international presence suggest a more proven solution. Are you ready to commit to a system with proven scalability, or do you prefer a potentially simpler alternative with less market presence?
Agilysys PMS is the clear leader with over 40 reviews, recent feedback, and an overall solid rating of 3.22 out of 5, supported by a high NPS score of 7.67/5. Ciaobooking has no reviews, no ratings, and no market data, which limits confidence in its reliability or suitability. If your hotel values proven performance and extensive integrations, Agilysys is the safer choice.
Given the volume and recency of Agilysys reviews, your team will benefit from its ongoing updates and user feedback. Ciaobooking’s lack of user feedback makes it difficult to assess its performance or support quality—it's a hypothetical option at best.
Agilysys PMS is designed for hotels that need an all-in-one, customizable property management platform capable of handling complex operations like multi-currency transactions, automated night audits, and guest communication. It’s tailored for resorts, casinos, and branded properties with a need for deep integration and extensive features.
Ciaobooking, on the other hand, appears more suited for smaller, straightforward operations or hotels seeking basic reservation and automation tools, but with no reviews or feature details, it’s hard to confirm its fit. Does your hotel require a scalable, feature-rich PMS or a lightweight system?
Agilysys’s comprehensive functionality—54 features including digital registration, guest CRM, channel management, and advanced reporting—makes it ideal for larger, operationally complex properties. Ciaobooking’s minimal publicly available info suggests it might suit smaller, less complex properties, but risks remain due to lack of reviews.
Are you looking for a mature platform with proven reliability or an untested solution that might lack depth? The choice depends on your property’s complexity and growth plans.
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich property management system capable of supporting large operations, Agilysys is the clear choice. Its 42 reviews, 12 recent, and a 73.18 overall score demonstrate proven user satisfaction, especially among resorts and branded properties.
If your focus is on a lightweight, potentially easier-to-implement system with fewer features, Ciaobooking might be appealing, but its lack of reviews and market presence is a significant drawback. For properties prioritizing reliability, Agilysys offers a comprehensive package with proven ROI, while Ciaobooking remains an unverified option.
Hotels with complex operations, multi-property management needs, or regions outside North America should lean toward Agilysys. Smaller boutique hotels or startups might consider Ciaobooking if they can verify its capabilities, but risk remains.
In summary, for confidence, proven performance, and extensive features, Agilysys is the definitive choice.
Agilysys PMS scores highly for ease of use, with a 4.36/5 rating derived from reviews indicating straightforward navigation and efficient workflows. Its user-friendly design supports staff onboarding, even for seasonal or less tech-savvy employees, with robust training resources like tutorials and super-user support.
Ciaobooking has no publicly available review data on usability, support, or onboarding, making it impossible to assess its user experience accurately. Given Agilysys’s high usability rating and recent reviews, it clearly leads in supporting hotel staff effectively.
Edge: Agilysys.
Agilysys PMS offers an extensive suite of 54 unique features, including direct billing, multi-currency support, automated night audits, guest CRM, channel management, in-room check-in, and integrated payment solutions—many of which are absent in Ciaobooking’s limited or unspecified offerings.
Ciaobooking does not specify its features or integrations, making it impossible to compare directly. Its lack of detailed feature data suggests it may not provide the comprehensive functionality needed for larger or more complex properties.
Agilysys’s feature depth and variety give your hotel more control and flexibility, especially for multi-property or high-volume operations.
Edge: Agilysys.
Agilysys PMS’s support ratings sit at 3.92/5, with reviews highlighting a generally responsive team but occasional delays. Users appreciate the onboarding process and support resources, including tutorials, though some mention support response times could improve.
Ciaobooking has no reviews or customer support ratings publicly available, making it difficult to assess its support quality. The absence of feedback indicates a significant uncertainty regarding its responsiveness and service quality.
Given Agilysys’s established presence and recent reviews, it clearly offers more reliable support—an essential factor for operational stability.
Edge: Agilysys.
Agilysys PMS integrates with 23 verified partners, including key vendors like SiteMinder, Revinate, and Springer-Miller Systems. Its extensive integration network supports seamless operations across PMS, CRS, channel management, and POS systems.
Ciaobooking has no publicly available data on integrations, limiting visibility into its connectivity potential. Without verified partners, integration flexibility remains unconfirmed, especially critical for larger or multi-system environments.
For your hotel, Agilysys’s proven integrations streamline operations and reduce manual work, a significant advantage over an unverified, less connected platform.
Edge: Agilysys.
Agilysys PMS’s overall rating of 3.22/5 is based on 42 reviews, with recent positive feedback emphasizing its robustness and ease of use. Hotels across segments, especially resorts and branded properties, rate it favorably—many citing operational efficiencies and good support.
Ciaobooking has no reviews or ratings, leaving no data on user satisfaction or hotel segment preferences. Its absence of feedback makes it impossible to determine how hoteliers perceive its value or performance.
Given the review volume and recent feedback, Agilysys is the clear frontrunner in hotel ratings.
Edge: Agilysys.
Agilysys PMS is priced at a base fee of $1,000, with no mention of trial options or additional monthly fees. It appears to be a straightforward, upfront licensing model, suitable for hotels prepared for a significant investment.
Ciaobooking’s pricing information is unavailable, making direct comparison impossible. The lack of transparency suggests potential additional costs or custom quotes.
Your hotel should factor in total cost of ownership, including support and upgrades, but Agilysys’s transparent pricing provides a clear starting point.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, has minimal operational complexity, or if budget constraints favor simpler solutions.
Agilysys is best for established hotels that need a reliable, feature-rich platform capable of supporting growth and complex workflows.
Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced features like multi-currency support, automated audits, or extensive integrations.
Given the lack of reviews and detailed feature info, Ciaobooking may be better suited for very small or emerging properties testing basic property management functions.
Agilysys PMS offers a proven, comprehensive platform with high user satisfaction backed by recent reviews, extensive features, and broad integrations. It’s designed for hotels that need scalable, reliable property management tooling to support complex operations and regional expansion.
Ciaobooking lacks review data, feature transparency, and market presence, making it a risky choice. Without proven customer feedback or integration capabilities, it’s best considered only if your property has very basic needs or if you’re willing to pilot a less established platform.
For hotels prioritizing reliability, functionality, and support, Agilysys is the definitive option. Ciaobooking may appeal to a niche segment but requires further validation before making a commitment.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
Ciaobooking | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Agilysys PMS 和 Ciaobooking 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
Ciaobooking |
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 42 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该系统用户友好,易于操作,这对于季节性员工的酒店来说至关重要,因为它可以减少培训时间。这对于快速员工入职至关重要。
该产品提供一系列功能,包括处理完整的客人旅程和前台、水疗、销售等服务的各种模块,所有这些都来自单一供应商。
该公司以根据具体业务挑战定制解决方案并积极响应客户反馈而闻名。定制解决方案可满足独特的房地产需求。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论提到,增强功能请求延迟,支持响应速度变慢,影响了服务质量。客户期望更快的沟通和更新。
Agilysys Versa is praised for seamlessly integrating various systems, which improves operational efficiency. This integration covers F&B, Sales, PMS,... Agilysys Versa is praised for seamlessly integrating various systems, which improves operational efficiency. This integration covers F&B, Sales, PMS, and more, helping streamline operations.
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Agilysys PMS 和 Ciaobooking 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Agilysys PMS 提供 23 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Ciaobooking 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Agilysys PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.4/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Agilysys PMS:否。Ciaobooking:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Agilysys Hospitality Solutions 的 HT Score 为 72,Ciaobooking 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问