The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 44 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Agilysys Hospitality Solutions 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Hilton 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 44 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $1,000/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 43 | 1 |
在分析了 44 条经验证的评价后,Agilysys Hospitality Solutions 用户最看重其 用户友好型设计, 全面的功能, 定制和解决方案,而 Hilton 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好型设计
▾
|
|
|
+
全面的功能
▾
|
|
|
+
定制和解决方案
▾
|
|
|
+
培训支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
发展和支持问题
▾
|
|
|
−
System Integration
▾
|
|
|
−
成本效益
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #54 2 条评价 | #60 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #41 9 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #25 4 条评价 | #52 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #6 11 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #45 9 条评价 | #60 1 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #29 13 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #48 3 条评价 | #56 1 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #21 24 条评价 | #40 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #27 1 条评价 | — |
When selecting a property management system (PMS), your hotel needs a solution that balances functionality, ease of use, support, and cost. Agilysys PMS offers a broad set of features and more recent reviews, whereas Hilton OnQ remains less reviewed and rated, with concerns about outdated technology. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize recent user feedback and robust feature sets or a system tailored specifically for Hilton's extensive portfolio.
Agilysys PMS stands out as the more reliable and feature-rich option, with 42 reviews and recent positive feedback. Hilton OnQ, despite being a proprietary system used exclusively within Hilton properties, has minimal recent reviews and faces criticism for outdated technology. For most hoteliers, Agilysys offers more value and confidence.
Both products aim to streamline hotel operations by managing reservations, guest profiles, check-ins, and billing. Agilysys PMS primarily targets a wide range of hotel types, from resorts to boutique hotels, offering extensive features and integrations. Hilton OnQ, by contrast, is a proprietary system built in-house for Hilton's properties, designed to serve their specific needs but with limited flexibility for other brands.
While Agilysys PMS touts a hospitality-centric approach, capturing every aspect of guest interaction and operational nuance, Hilton OnQ’s main strength is its integration within Hilton's vast ecosystem. However, its outdated tech stack and limited recent reviews cast doubt on its current performance. Does your hotel need a flexible, well-supported system that can adapt to various operational complexities? Or are you committed to Hilton’s in-house offering?
The key question: Does your hotel require a versatile, feature-rich solution, or is integration with Hilton’s ecosystem sufficient? If your hotel needs adaptability and proven performance, Agilysys is the clearer choice.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, multi-faceted PMS with a wide array of features, go with Agilysys. It offers 54 unique features, including direct billing, multi-currency support, automated night audits, guest CRM, booking engine, mobile app, and advanced revenue management tools—something Hilton OnQ lacks altogether.
If your hotel operates within Hilton’s portfolio and values a system built specifically for Hilton properties, Hilton OnQ may suffice. However, with only one recent review and a 1/5 overall rating, its usability and support reputation are questionable. For most hoteliers seeking flexibility, Agilysys’s extensive feature set and recent positive reviews make it the superior choice.
In summary, choose Agilysys if you want a scalable, feature-rich PMS backed by recent customer feedback. Opt for Hilton OnQ only if your hotel is part of Hilton’s chain and willing to accept its outdated technology limitations.
Agilysys PMS boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.36/5, supported by reviews praising its logical button setup and straightforward navigation. Users find it relatively easy to learn, despite a steep initial learning curve due to its extensive features, and report quick adaptation with proper onboarding.
Hilton OnQ, on the other hand, has a dismal ease-of-use score of 1/5 and is criticized for its outdated interface and poor user experience. The reviews imply that Hilton’s system is cumbersome, slow, and frustrating, especially given its aging design.
Edge: Agilysys PMS.
Agilysys offers 54 features, many of which are absent in Hilton OnQ. These include guest communication tools like SMS messaging, native email marketing, digital registration, online check-in/out, integrated ID scanner, mobile apps, room automation, revenue management, and advanced reporting—covering virtually all guest lifecycle and operational needs.
Hilton OnQ offers no additional features beyond core reservation and check-in functionalities, limiting its capabilities to basic property management tasks. Given the extensive feature set of Agilysys, it provides a comprehensive operational toolkit.
Edge: Agilysys PMS.
Agilysys PMS has a customer support rating of 3.92/5, with reviews citing responsive support and helpful onboarding. Users appreciate training resources like video tutorials and the availability of dedicated super-user support, which facilitate staff adoption.
Hilton OnQ’s support reputation is poor, with a 1/5 rating and reviews highlighting ongoing frustrations with technical issues. The consistent critique centers around their outdated infrastructure and lack of responsiveness, making support a significant concern.
Edge: Agilysys PMS.
Agilysys PMS integrates with 23 verified partners, including popular solutions like Actabl, SiteMinder, Revinate, and Zaplox. These integrations streamline operations across sales, marketing, revenue management, and guest engagement.
Hilton OnQ integrates with only 6 verified partners, primarily within Hilton’s ecosystem, including Impulsify and Canary Technologies. Its limited integrations restrict flexibility and may necessitate manual workarounds.
Edge: Agilysys PMS.
Agilysys PMS has a significantly higher review count (42 reviews, 12 recent) and an overall rating of 3.22/5. Recent reviews are generally positive, with hoteliers praising its ease of use, features, and support.
Hilton OnQ has only one review, rated poorly at 0/5. This lack of recent feedback and low rating suggests widespread dissatisfaction, especially regarding outdated technology and support.
Edge: Agilysys PMS.
Agilysys PMS is priced at a $1,000 base fee, with no freemium options or monthly fees, making it straightforward but potentially costly upfront. Hilton does not publicly disclose pricing, but as a proprietary Hilton product, costs are typically included in franchise fees or negotiated individually.
If affordability and transparency are priorities, Agilysys’s clear pricing structure offers better predictability. Hilton’s pricing remains opaque and potentially higher, especially for non-Hilton properties.
Not ideal if you are a small property with minimal tech needs or only operate within Hilton’s ecosystem.
Not ideal if your hotel values flexibility, modern design, or independent operation outside Hilton’s ecosystem.
The core difference is that Agilysys PMS offers a comprehensive, flexible solution designed to meet diverse hotel needs, while Hilton OnQ is a tailored system optimized for Hilton’s properties but limited in features and modernity.
Choose Agilysys if you prioritize recent reviews, robust features, and support, especially if your property is outside Hilton’s chain. Hilton OnQ may work for Hilton-branded hotels seeking seamless integration within Hilton’s ecosystem but is not recommended for independent or multi-brand properties due to its outdated technology.
If you want a scalable, feature-rich platform that adapts to your hotel’s evolving needs, Agilysys is the clear choice. For Hilton properties committed to Hilton’s system, OnQ might suffice, but with notable drawbacks.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Agilysys PMS 和 Hilton OnQ 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 42 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该系统用户友好,易于操作,这对于季节性员工的酒店来说至关重要,因为它可以减少培训时间。这对于快速员工入职至关重要。
该产品提供一系列功能,包括处理完整的客人旅程和前台、水疗、销售等服务的各种模块,所有这些都来自单一供应商。
该公司以根据具体业务挑战定制解决方案并积极响应客户反馈而闻名。定制解决方案可满足独特的房地产需求。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论提到,增强功能请求延迟,支持响应速度变慢,影响了服务质量。客户期望更快的沟通和更新。
Agilysys Versa is praised for seamlessly integrating various systems, which improves operational efficiency. This integration covers F&B, Sales, PMS,... Agilysys Versa is praised for seamlessly integrating various systems, which improves operational efficiency. This integration covers F&B, Sales, PMS, and more, helping streamline operations.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Agilysys PMS 和 Hilton OnQ 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Agilysys PMS 提供 23 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Hilton OnQ 提供 6 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Agilysys PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.4/5 对比 1.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Agilysys PMS:否。Hilton OnQ:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Agilysys Hospitality Solutions 的 HT Score 为 72,Hilton 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问