The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 210 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Aiosell Technologies 表现出色 在 支持服务 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Google Analytics tracking and Price comparison widget.
Exely 表现出色 在 支持与响应 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Multi-room bookings and Booking abandonment recapture.
基于 HTR 上 210 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $100/mo | From $200/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 38 | 172 |
在分析了 210 条经验证的评价后,Aiosell Technologies 用户最看重其 支持服务, 用户友好界面, 集成能力,而 Exely 用户则强调 支持与响应, 预订引擎效率, 直接预订增强。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持服务
▾
|
+
支持与响应
▾
|
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
+
预订引擎效率
▾
|
|
+
集成能力
▾
|
+
直接预订增强
▾
|
|
+
渠道管理
▾
|
+
通道管理器同步
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
−
集成和高级功能
▾
|
|
−
系统性能
▾
|
−
宾客体验问题
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #14 18 条评价 | #15 34 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #33 2 条评价 | #11 64 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #40 0 条评价 | #22 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #31 0 条评价 | #8 6 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #30 4 条评价 | #15 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #21 10 条评价 | #15 28 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #28 3 条评价 | #16 17 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #21 3 条评价 | #16 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #20 2 条评价 | #24 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #37 1 条评价 | #25 11 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #7 23 条评价 | #4 79 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #18 0 条评价 | #2 17 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine for your hotel involves evaluating many factors—from ease of use to feature set, support, and overall value. While Aiosell's Booking Engine has a modest review count but recent, positive feedback, Exely's platform boasts a significantly larger and more current review base, reflecting broader user satisfaction. Both aim to streamline direct bookings and reduce OTA dependence, yet their approaches and strengths differ. Which one aligns best with your hotel’s needs?
Both Aiosell and Exely offer booking engines designed to increase direct bookings and simplify management. Aiosell emphasizes an intuitive interface, integration with its property management and channel management tools, and affordability, with 26 reviews—4 in the last six months—indicating recent user feedback. Conversely, Exely has 144 reviews, with 63 recent ones, providing a broader, more current snapshot of user experiences.
Aiosell scores a 76.13 on the HTTR score, with a perfect ease of use rating of 4.92/5 and a customer support rating of 4.92/5, highlighting its user-friendly design and attentive support. Exely, however, scores higher at 92.67, with slightly better support ratings (4.96/5) and similar ease of use (4.91/5), reflecting its wider adoption and consistent performance.
Both products aim to enhance direct booking revenue, but Exely’s larger review base and more recent reviews suggest a more reliable and well-established platform for hoteliers seeking proven performance. Do you prioritize recent user feedback and larger review volume, or are you more interested in a simpler, cost-effective solution?
If your hotel needs a robust, feature-rich platform that excels in conversions, scalability, and industry-wide trust, Exely is the clear choice. Its suite of marketing tools, fast channel synchronization, and broad user base make it suitable for independent hotels and larger chains looking to maximize direct bookings and guest engagement.
On the other hand, if your team values ease of use, affordability, and straightforward integration with existing property management systems, Aiosell may be more fitting. Its simple interface, affordability ($100 vs $200 monthly), and positive recent reviews make it an attractive option for smaller or budget-conscious hotels.
In summary, opt for Exely if you need a proven, feature-packed solution with broader adoption and recent performance data. Choose Aiosell if your hotel prioritizes simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and quick onboarding.
Both platforms excel in user-friendliness, with Aiosell earning a 4.92/5 and Exely a 4.91/5 in ease of use ratings. Aiosell’s interface is praised for its simplicity and quick staff training, supported by a 4.84/5 onboarding rating, making it accessible even for teams with limited technical expertise.
Exely’s platform is equally intuitive, with a well-designed dashboard and a strong support team, as reflected in its customer reviews. Its recent reviews emphasize fast setup and smooth daily operations, which are critical for hotel teams managing high booking volumes.
Edge: Aiosell.
Aiosell offers 26 shared features with Exely, plus six unique features like Google Analytics, Price Comparison Widget, Google Pay, Pooled Inventory, Social Media Integration, and Availability Block. These features support comprehensive marketing and operational insights, with a focus on affordability and integrations with Google services.
Exely also provides 26 shared features but offers three exclusive functions: Multi-room Bookings, Booking Abandonment Recapture, and Form Autofill, which boost guest engagement and reduce drop-offs. However, its fewer overall features suggest less depth in marketing and analytics compared to Aiosell.
Edge: Aiosell, given its broader feature set and integrations.
Both products are highly rated for support, with Aiosell at 4.92/5 and Exely at 4.96/5. User reviews consistently praise Exely’s prompt, friendly, and effective support, helping hotels resolve issues rapidly and maintain smooth operations.
Aiosell’s support team also receives glowing feedback, especially regarding responsiveness and professionalism. However, the slightly higher rating for Exely suggests it may have a marginal edge, especially for hotels needing quick, reliable assistance.
Edge: Exely.
Aiosell features 12 verified partners, including industry heavyweights like SiteMinder, Hotelogix, and Yanolja Cloud, along with integrations for Google Analytics and Google Pay. It also offers unique integrations such as Social Media Booking and Pooled Inventory, valuable for marketing and availability management.
Exely has 8 verified partners, including Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Booking.com, with shared integrations like Clock and Oracle. While fewer in number, Exely’s partnerships focus more on channel management and booking platforms, but it lacks some of the marketing-focused integrations Aiosell offers.
Edge: Aiosell.
Exely has a stronger overall rating at 92.67, compared to Aiosell's 76.13, largely driven by its larger and more recent review base of 144 reviews—63 in the last six months. Recent reviews praise Exely for its user-friendly interface, fast operation, and reliable support, making it more attractive for hotels seeking proven performance.
Aiosell’s reviews, though positive, are fewer and less recent, with many praising ease of use and integration but noting room for feature improvements. For hoteliers prioritizing current feedback and comprehensive ratings, Exely is the preferable choice.
Edge: Exely.
Aiosell charges a flat $100 monthly fee with no implementation or trial fees, making it a budget-friendly option for smaller hotels or those new to booking engines. Exely’s cost is $200 per month, also without setup fees or trials, reflecting its broader feature set and larger user base.
Pricing differences highlight Exely’s positioning as a more comprehensive, enterprise-ready platform, though some smaller hotels might prefer Aiosell’s lower price point.
Hotels that should consider Aiosell tend to be:
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive marketing tools, advanced analytics, or custom reporting.
Exely suits:
Not ideal if your hotel is small with limited budget or minimal need for customization; in that case, simpler solutions may suffice.
The core difference is that Exely provides a broader, more feature-rich platform suitable for hotels aiming for maximum direct bookings and sophisticated marketing tools, supported by a larger, more recent review base. Aiosell offers a more affordable and straightforward solution, ideal for small to mid-sized hotels seeking ease of use and basic integration capabilities.
If you need proven, extensive features, and a platform with strong recent feedback, Exely is the better fit. If your hotel values simplicity, affordability, and quick onboarding, Aiosell remains a dependable choice.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking a scalable, well-reviewed booking engine today, Exely’s larger user base, recent reviews, and feature set make it the recommended option. However, if budget constraints or ease of use are your top priorities, Aiosell can still meet your fundamental needs effectively.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $200/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Aiosell - Booking Engine 和 Exely Booking Engine 共享 26 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Google Analytics 跟踪 | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 |
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Aiosell 的支持团队因其响应速度和专业精神而备受好评。他们的周到服务和快速解决问题的能力让用户感到安心。尽管总体上令人满意,但偶尔也会收到一些关于特定技... Aiosell 的支持团队因其响应速度和专业精神而备受好评。他们的周到服务和快速解决问题的能力让用户感到安心。尽管总体上令人满意,但偶尔也会收到一些关于特定技术咨询响应延迟的反馈。
评论者一致称赞 Aiosell 的用户友好型设计,这有助于减少员工的培训时间。该平台布局直观,方便不同技术背景的用户轻松上手,为酒店运营管理提供直观的体验。
Aiosell 平台高效集成第三方系统,为运营管理带来灵活性。用户对其跨平台的无缝同步功能表示赞赏,但希望在 API 集成和灵活的第三方连接方面有所改进,以更好地... Aiosell 平台高效集成第三方系统,为运营管理带来灵活性。用户对其跨平台的无缝同步功能表示赞赏,但希望在 API 集成和灵活的第三方连接方面有所改进,以更好地满足多样化的运营需求。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Aiosell 平台高效集成第三方系统,为运营管理带来灵活性。用户对其跨平台的无缝同步功能表示赞赏,但希望在 API 集成和灵活的第三方连接方面有所改进,以更好地... Aiosell 平台高效集成第三方系统,为运营管理带来灵活性。用户对其跨平台的无缝同步功能表示赞赏,但希望在 API 集成和灵活的第三方连接方面有所改进,以更好地满足多样化的运营需求。
虽然Aiosell提供了丰富的报告生成选项,但用户表示需要更全面、更可定制的报告工具。添加更详细、更针对行业的报告,可以极大地帮助酒店管理的决策过程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Exely 的支持团队以其快速响应和以解决方案为导向的服务而备受赞誉,从而显著提升了用户体验。这被视为该产品的一大优势。
Exely的预订引擎因其用户友好性、运行速度快以及显著提升直接预订量的能力而备受赞誉,从而有助于收入增长。它被认为对提升宾客体验和转化率具有强大的积极影响... Exely的预订引擎因其用户友好性、运行速度快以及显著提升直接预订量的能力而备受赞誉,从而有助于收入增长。它被认为对提升宾客体验和转化率具有强大的积极影响。
该软件因增加直接预订量并降低对在线旅行社 (OTA) 的依赖而备受赞誉。这通过降低第三方费用和高效的预订管理带来投资回报,从而对酒店收入产生积极影响。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户反复反映的一个关键问题是自定义选项有限,尤其是在报表和网站设计方面。用户希望能够更灵活地调整模板和报表,以满足自身需求。
用户希望看到与其他酒店管理系统的集成能力得到提升。目前的集成限制被视为一个缺点,制约了平台全部潜力的发挥。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Aiosell - Booking Engine 和 Exely Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Aiosell - Booking Engine 提供 12 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Exely Booking Engine 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Exely Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Aiosell - Booking Engine:否。Exely Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Aiosell Technologies 的 HT Score 为 77,Exely 的为 93。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问