The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 625 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Exely 表现出色 在 支持与响应 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Referral Reporting.
Yanolja Cloud Solution 表现出色 在 integration with pms and channel manager 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Urgency messaging.
基于 HTR 上 625 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $200/mo | From $100/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 172 | 453 |
在分析了 625 条经验证的评价后,Exely 用户最看重其 支持与响应, 预订引擎效率, 直接预订增强,而 Yanolja Cloud Solution 用户则强调 integration with pms and channel manager, 预订流程和可用性, 直接预订和收入。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持与响应
▾
|
+
Integration with PMS and Channel Manager
▾
|
|
+
预订引擎效率
▾
|
+
预订流程和可用性
▾
|
|
+
直接预订增强
▾
|
+
直接预订和收入
▾
|
|
+
通道管理器同步
▾
|
+
实时库存和定价
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
−
高级报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
集成和高级功能
▾
|
−
移动兼容性
▾
|
|
−
宾客体验问题
▾
|
−
定制和品牌
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 34 条评价 | #2 252 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #11 64 条评价 | #7 99 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #22 5 条评价 | #13 12 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #8 6 条评价 | #29 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 35 条评价 | #5 159 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #15 28 条评价 | #5 203 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 17 条评价 | #7 69 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #16 9 条评价 | #13 15 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #24 2 条评价 | #5 48 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #25 11 条评价 | #28 7 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #4 79 条评价 | #3 342 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #2 17 条评价 | #6 10 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine is crucial for your hotel's success in capturing direct reservations, managing availability, and enhancing guest experience. Both Exely Booking Engine and Yanolja Cloud Solution are designed to meet these needs, but they differ significantly in features, user reviews, and global presence. Your decision hinges on your specific hotel type, regional focus, and desired functionalities.
Exely offers a more extensive feature set and higher recent review activity, giving it a notable edge in reliability and user confidence. But does one product truly outperform the other in key areas that matter most to your hotel?
Both products aim to simplify online bookings and reduce reliance on OTAs, but they diverge in their target markets and feature depth. Exely’s focus on customization, detailed reporting, and marketing tools makes it appealing for independent hotels and boutique properties seeking to boost direct bookings. Yanolja, meanwhile, excels in integration, automation, and scalability, particularly appealing for larger resorts and hotel groups expanding their digital footprint.
Exely’s review count (144) and recent reviews (63 in the last six months) give it more recent user feedback, boosting confidence in its ongoing support and feature evolution. Yanolja’s broader regional presence and larger review base (380 reviews) also indicate stability, but its recent review activity is limited, slightly weakening current data reliability.
Do you prioritize detailed marketing and analytics, or is seamless integration across multiple properties more crucial? Both products address these needs differently.
If your hotel primarily needs a flexible, feature-rich booking engine with advanced marketing tools and detailed reporting, go with Exely. Its extensive feature list, including room substitutions, conversion reports, and integrations with multiple payment gateways, makes it suitable for boutique hotels, resorts, and properties focused on direct booking growth.
If your hotel operates across several locations, values automation, and prefers a robust integration ecosystem, Yanolja is the better option. Its strong global presence, many integrations—including Xero, Quickbooks, and RevControl—and ease of use make it suited for larger hotel chains and resorts looking for a scalable, all-in-one platform.
In summary, choose Exely if customization and marketing are your priorities, and Yanolja if operational efficiency and integrations take precedence.
Exely’s UI is rated 4.91/5, with users praising its straightforward dashboard and fast onboarding. Support responsiveness is also highly rated (4.96/5), with reviews citing prompt, friendly assistance that accelerates staff adoption.
Yanolja scores slightly lower at 4.76/5 but still impresses users with its intuitive interface and quick setup. Support ratings are strong at 4.78/5, and reviews highlight its smooth integration and ease of managing reservations across channels.
Edge: Exely — its slightly higher usability score and more recent positive reviews suggest a marginal advantage.
Exely’s 15 exclusive features outpace Yanolja’s 8, including tools like room substitutions, conversion rate reports, customizable add-ons, Facebook conversion tracking, Tripadvisor bookings, and multiple payment options (PayPal, Stripe, PayU). Its feature depth supports complex rate management and marketing efforts.
Yanolja offers unique features like urgency messaging, pooled inventory, loyalty program integration, gift vouchers, and social media bookings, but it lacks the same level of customization and detailed reporting found in Exely.
Overall, Exely’s broader and more advanced feature set provides a decisive edge for hotels seeking comprehensive control.
Edge: Exely — its richer feature catalog enhances versatility and marketing capabilities.
Exely’s reviews consistently rate customer support at 4.96/5, with users emphasizing rapid, friendly, and effective assistance. Comments mention how support teams help troubleshoot issues promptly, boosting confidence in their responsiveness.
Yanolja also scores well at 4.78/5, with users praising its support team and ease of onboarding. Reviewers highlight quick responses and helpful support, though not quite at the same level of enthusiasm as Exely.
Edge: Exely — higher support ratings and more recent reviews favor its responsiveness.
Yanolja boasts 157 verified partners, including Xero, Quickbooks, and VISIT, making it highly scalable for larger operations. Its extensive integration network supports a wide range of PMS, channel managers, and payment solutions.
Exely has 8 verified partners, including Oracle Hospitality and Booking.com, but its limited integrations may restrict growth for large, multi-system hotels.
For hotels prioritizing broad ecosystem connectivity, Yanolja’s extensive integrations are a clear advantage.
Edge: Yanolja — its broader integration network supports complex, multi-system management.
Exely’s review count (144) and recent activity mean its ratings are based on more current experiences, with a high likelihood to recommend (98%). However, the overall rating is 0/5, indicating possible issues or limited recent feedback in some segments.
Yanolja’s 380 reviews and a 4.63/5 overall rating reflect consistent satisfaction, especially among larger resorts and chain hotels. Recent reviews (none in the last six months) suggest stable performance, but less current feedback may influence perceptions.
For most hoteliers, Exely’s recent reviews and higher recommendation score (98%) make it the more trusted option.
Edge: Exely — more recent reviews and higher likelihood to recommend.
Exely’s base price is $200 per month, with no free tier or trial, representing a premium investment. Yanolja’s base price is $100 per month, also without a free trial, making it more accessible for smaller budgets.
Pricing differences reflect their targeted markets: Exely’s features cater to hotels seeking customization and marketing tools, justifying its higher price.
If budget is a key concern, Yanolja offers a lower-cost option with broad scalability.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Both products aim to increase direct bookings and improve operational efficiency, but they serve different hotel profiles. Exely’s feature-rich platform and recent user reviews position it as the top choice for hotels seeking control, marketing, and detailed reporting.
Choose Exely if your hotel values customization, advanced marketing tools, and detailed analytics, especially if you are independent or boutique. Its recent review volume and high user ratings make it a trusted solution for hotels looking to boost direct revenue.
Yanolja excels in scalability, integrations, and automated management, making it the better choice for larger hotel groups or resorts with complex operational needs. Its extensive partner network and global reach support multi-property management at a competitive price point.
In conclusion, for most hotels prioritizing recent user feedback and detailed capabilities, Exely takes the lead. Yet, if your hotel needs a broad, scalable platform with extensive integrations, Yanolja remains a strong contender.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | From $100/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Exely Booking Engine 和 Yanolja Booking Engine 共享 14 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 价格对比 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 11 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
"We can now manage every property in our franchise from a single dashboard, track performance instantly, and know that our team has 24/7 support whenever it’s needed. It has complet..."
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Exely 的支持团队以其快速响应和以解决方案为导向的服务而备受赞誉,从而显著提升了用户体验。这被视为该产品的一大优势。
Exely的预订引擎因其用户友好性、运行速度快以及显著提升直接预订量的能力而备受赞誉,从而有助于收入增长。它被认为对提升宾客体验和转化率具有强大的积极影响... Exely的预订引擎因其用户友好性、运行速度快以及显著提升直接预订量的能力而备受赞誉,从而有助于收入增长。它被认为对提升宾客体验和转化率具有强大的积极影响。
该软件因增加直接预订量并降低对在线旅行社 (OTA) 的依赖而备受赞誉。这通过降低第三方费用和高效的预订管理带来投资回报,从而对酒店收入产生积极影响。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户反复反映的一个关键问题是自定义选项有限,尤其是在报表和网站设计方面。用户希望能够更灵活地调整模板和报表,以满足自身需求。
用户希望看到与其他酒店管理系统的集成能力得到提升。目前的集成限制被视为一个缺点,制约了平台全部潜力的发挥。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Reviews appreciate the seamless integration of the booking engine with PMS and Channel Manager, making day-to-day operations smooth by providing real-... Reviews appreciate the seamless integration of the booking engine with PMS and Channel Manager, making day-to-day operations smooth by providing real-time updates and eliminating risks of manual error and overbookings. This functionality enhances both front-office and back-end processes, helping hotels to save time and reduce reliance on third-party platforms.
用户认为当前的预订流程冗长且碎片化,建议更精简的流程可以减少流失率并提高转化率。他们建议采用两步或三步的预订流程,以提升预订流程的流畅性,尤其是在移动... 用户认为当前的预订流程冗长且碎片化,建议更精简的流程可以减少流失率并提高转化率。他们建议采用两步或三步的预订流程,以提升预订流程的流畅性,尤其是在移动设备上,从而确保更佳的宾客体验。
该引擎被证明能够有效增加直接预订量,降低支付给OTA的佣金,从而保障酒店收入。用户称赞其用户友好的设计,能够有效吸引直接流量访问酒店网站。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然预订引擎提供了基本的报告功能,但用户需要更高级的分析工具和自定义选项,以便更好地跟踪绩效指标并支持战略决策。与 Google Analytics 等外部分析平台的集... 虽然预订引擎提供了基本的报告功能,但用户需要更高级的分析工具和自定义选项,以便更好地跟踪绩效指标并支持战略决策。与 Google Analytics 等外部分析平台的集成尤其值得一提,是一项亟待改进的功能。
尽管移动端有诸多优势,但用户指出其可用性仍有提升空间,尤其是在用户界面方面,有时用户界面显得有些局促。更具设备响应能力的设计可以提升整体用户互动体验,... 尽管移动端有诸多优势,但用户指出其可用性仍有提升空间,尤其是在用户界面方面,有时用户界面显得有些局促。更具设备响应能力的设计可以提升整体用户互动体验,并提升移动端预订的获取率。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Exely Booking Engine 和 Yanolja Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Exely Booking Engine 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Yanolja Booking Engine 提供 157 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Exely Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Exely Booking Engine:否。Yanolja Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Exely 的 HT Score 为 93,Yanolja Cloud Solution 的为 92。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问