The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 51 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Aiosell Technologies 表现出色 在 ROI 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Centralized Messaging.
Lodgical Solution 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text).
基于 HTR 上 51 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $100/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 46 | 5 |
在分析了 51 条经验证的评价后,Aiosell Technologies 用户最看重其 seamless integration and usability, 支持和客户服务, channel management,而 Lodgical Solution 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Seamless Integration and Usability
▾
|
|
|
+
支持和客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化和效率
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
改进空间
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和可定制性
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #23 23 条评价 | #51 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #40 5 条评价 | #55 2 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #49 0 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #40 0 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #32 9 条评价 | #58 2 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #28 9 条评价 | #52 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #32 3 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #30 4 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #34 2 条评价 | #30 5 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | #45 0 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #8 29 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #10 3 条评价 | — |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Aiosell and Lodgical Solution aim to streamline your processes, but they differ significantly in support, features, and market reach. Your decision hinges on which platform aligns better with your hotel size, tech needs, and growth plans.
With Aiosell’s extensive review base, more recent feedback, and higher overall ratings, it’s clear that this product currently offers a more reliable and scalable solution. But does it meet your specific needs? Let’s compare.
Aiosell and Lodgical Solution both address core PMS functionalities like reservations, billing, and guest management. Aiosell’s strength lies in its automation, extensive integrations, and AI-powered revenue tools, while Lodgical focuses on simplicity, ease of use, and affordability.
However, Aiosell’s recent reviews and larger review count give it a clear edge in data-backed reliability—more hotel operators are sharing their experiences with Aiosell in the last six months, bolstering confidence in its current performance. Do you want a proven, feature-rich system with more recent user feedback? Or is your priority a straightforward, budget-friendly solution?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-packed PMS that integrates with multiple partners, handles automation effortlessly, and is supported by recent, detailed reviews, go with Aiosell. It’s especially suitable if you operate across different regions or plan to expand, given its broad geographic presence and multi-currency/multi-lingual capabilities.
If your hotel is small or mid-sized, prioritizes ease of use, and prefers a straightforward system with limited integrations, Lodgical may be sufficient. Its affordability and user-friendly design make it appealing if your team needs basic management tools without complex features.
Ultimately, the choice depends on your hotel’s complexity. For most hotels looking for reliability backed by recent, extensive reviews, Aiosell is the safer bet.
Aiosell boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.75/5 based on recent reviews, with many users praising its intuitive interface and minimal learning curve. Users highlight that staff quickly adopt Aiosell, especially thanks to its clear navigation and automation.
Lodgical Solution also scores highly at 4.8/5, with reviewers emphasizing its straightforward setup, simple workflows, and helpful onboarding. Its interface is described as user-friendly and accessible, even for staff with minimal technical skills.
Edge: Lodgical Solution.
Aiosell offers 23 features unique to its platform, including automated night audits, a centralized messaging system, integrated ID scanners, GDPR compliance, and revenue management modules. These functions support complex operations and automation at scale.
Lodgical provides 3 exclusive features such as gift vouchers, online checkout, and voice-to-text notes—useful but less comprehensive. Most of its features overlap with Aiosell, but it lacks advanced modules like automated audits or revenue tools.
Edge: Aiosell.
Aiosell’s support is highly rated at 4.75/5, with recent reviews describing their team as responsive, helpful, and quick to resolve issues. Hotel operators mention that support is available and effective, contributing to fewer operational disruptions.
Lodgical’s support scores slightly lower at 4.6/5, with reviews praising friendly staff but noting occasional delays in communication about upgrades and features. Its support remains solid but less recent feedback makes it harder to gauge current performance.
Edge: Aiosell.
Aiosell integrates with 12 verified partners, including major channel managers like SiteMinder, Yanolja, and Oracle Hospitality. Its integrations focus on distribution, payments, and guest data, supporting operational needs.
Lodgical connects with 20 systems, including third-party booking engines, revenue tools, and POS systems. Its broader ecosystem coverage allows more flexibility, especially for properties relying on multiple vendors.
Edge: Lodgical Solution.
Aiosell’s recent reviews and higher review count favor its standing among hoteliers, with a 97% likelihood to recommend and a 9.64/10 NPS score. Hoteliers in diverse segments, from boutique to resorts, express satisfaction with its automation and integrations.
Lodgical, with fewer reviews and older feedback, garners an 80% recommendation rate, primarily praised for ease of use and affordability. Larger or more complex hotels tend to prefer Aiosell’s feature set and support.
Edge: Aiosell.
Aiosell charges a straightforward $100 monthly fee with no implementation or hidden costs. Its transparent pricing and all-in-one approach make budgeting predictable.
Lodgical’s pricing model is not publicly disclosed, but it’s positioned as a more affordable alternative, likely with a lower entry point suitable for small properties. Exact costs may vary based on specific needs and integrations.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Aiosell offers a comprehensive, automated platform with strong recent reviews, making it the top choice for hotels seeking scalability and advanced features. Its wide array of integrations, revenue tools, and support quality support long-term growth.
Lodgical excels in simplicity, affordability, and ease of use, fitting small to mid-sized hotels that want a dependable system without the complexity. It’s well-suited for properties that prioritize straightforward management and quick onboarding.
For most hotels aiming to grow or needing robust automation, Aiosell is the recommended choice. If your hotel is small, with limited tech needs, and prefers simplicity, consider Lodgical as a cost-effective option.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Aiosell - Property Management System 和 Lodgical Solution 共享 26 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 集中消息传递 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 14 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many users highlight Aiosell’s ability to seamlessly integrate various hotel management components such as PMS, channel manager, and booking engine in... Many users highlight Aiosell’s ability to seamlessly integrate various hotel management components such as PMS, channel manager, and booking engine into one platform. This integration facilitates efficient management, saves time, and enhances control over hotel operations.
Aiosell 的支持团队经常被称赞为响应迅速、解决问题高效。这种可靠的支持确保了操作的顺畅,并在需要时提供帮助,从而为用户带来了积极的体验。
Users have found Aiosell's channel management to effectively keep OTA inventory and rates in sync, minimizing risks of overbooking. Its real-time data... Users have found Aiosell's channel management to effectively keep OTA inventory and rates in sync, minimizing risks of overbooking. Its real-time data synchronization across platforms optimizes occupancy and offers streamlined channel management.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 Aiosell 总体上受到好评,但用户指出了潜在的增长领域,例如提供更灵活的集成选项、改进移动应用程序体验以及提供更高级的错误修复和定制。
Though reports are generally considered easy to generate, some reviews point out areas for enhancement like deeper analytics, consistency, and accurac... Though reports are generally considered easy to generate, some reviews point out areas for enhancement like deeper analytics, consistency, and accuracy. Detailed reporting could aid in strategic decision-making by providing better insights.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Aiosell - Property Management System 和 Lodgical Solution 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Aiosell - Property Management System 提供 12 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Lodgical Solution 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Aiosell - Property Management System 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Aiosell - Property Management System:否。Lodgical Solution:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Aiosell Technologies 的 HT Score 为 78,Lodgical Solution 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问