The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 38 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Amadeus 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.7/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile access on any device and Pace, Sales Activity, and GRC Reporting.
BookingTek 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 38 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 38 | 0 |
在分析了 38 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 易于使用, 客户联系和事件管理, 收益管理,而 BookingTek 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
客户联系和事件管理
▾
|
|
|
+
收益管理
▾
|
|
|
+
集中数据管理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
集成和系统问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告
▾
|
|
|
−
培训与转型
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 活动管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #7 1 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #6 6 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 9 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #5 9 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 11 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 15 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #5 1 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 23 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 | #6 1 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #5 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Amadeus Delphi® and BookingTek Meetings Maker depends on your hotel’s specific needs for event management and booking automation. Amadeus offers a highly integrated platform with extensive features tailored for complex event planning, while BookingTek emphasizes simplicity and direct booking capabilities for smaller meetings and room bookings. Both aim to boost revenue and operational efficiency, but their approaches and strengths are quite different.
Amadeus has a broader feature set, more recent reviews, and a solid reputation in the industry, making it the more reliable choice for hotels seeking comprehensive event management. BookingTek’s focus on ease of use and direct online booking appeals to properties prioritizing straightforward, real-time meeting room reservations.
Amadeus Delphi is better suited for larger hotels and resorts needing detailed, integrated sales and event management tools. Its extensive features and widespread regional presence make it a robust option for properties with complex needs.
BookingTek’s Meetings Maker is ideal if your hotel prioritizes simple, direct online booking for meeting spaces and small groups, with minimal setup and quick ROI. It’s best for hotels looking for a cost-effective, straightforward solution with a focus on web-based reservations.
Amadeus excels in environments where detailed event planning, comprehensive reporting, and multi-property management are essential. Its 38 features, including BEO management, real-time task tracking, and an open API, support complex operations at large hotels, resorts, and branded properties.
BookingTek, with no available feature list or recent reviews, emphasizes ease of booking and direct online reservations, making it suitable for smaller hotels and properties that want to quickly enable guests to book meeting rooms and related accommodations via their website.
Amadeus’s reviews highlight its robustness, with a 4.53/5 overall rating from 38 reviews and recent feedback emphasizing its efficiency, despite some concerns about speed and cost. BookingTek’s lack of recent reviews and limited publicly available data suggest a less proven track record, especially for larger or more complex properties.
Are you looking for a fully integrated, feature-rich event management system, or a simple, quick-to-implement booking engine? This fundamental difference guides the choice.
If your hotel needs advanced event management capabilities, detailed reporting, and a multi-property platform, go with Amadeus. Its extensive feature set—covering BEO management, case handling, and analytics—makes it suitable for hotels with complex event and sales needs.
If your focus is on enabling guests to book meeting spaces and small groups directly on your website, especially if you want a quick deployment without complex integrations, BookingTek is the better fit. Its real-time booking and PCI compliance support straightforward, web-based reservations that can boost occupancy and revenue.
Hotels with extensive event planning, sales tracking, and multi-property oversight should lean toward Amadeus. Smaller properties prioritizing ease and online booking speed will benefit more from BookingTek.
Amadeus scores a 4.57/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive interface and report creation, though some users note it requires training due to its complexity. Onboarding is rated 4/5, and recent reviews indicate that users find it manageable once familiarized.
BookingTek, with no recent reviews or detailed UI ratings available, likely offers a simpler, more streamlined user experience, especially given its focus on web-based booking without extensive setup. Its cloud SaaS model suggests ease of deployment.
Edge: Amadeus, given its high usability ratings and familiar interface for hotel staff accustomed to integrated systems.
Amadeus’s platform boasts 38 unique features, including BEO management, lost & found modules, late checkouts, in-app translation, deep cleaning, and analytics dashboards. It supports complex event workflows, contract management, and advanced reporting, making it a comprehensive solution.
BookingTek offers no publicly listed features but emphasizes real-time online booking, multi-lingual support, multi-currency transactions, and seamless integration with Oracle MICROS Opera. Its core advantage is straightforward online meeting and room booking.
Amadeus’s feature depth makes it preferable for hotels requiring detailed event and sales management. BookingTek’s strength is its simplicity and direct booking focus.
Edge: Amadeus, for its extensive, specialized event management features that support large-scale operations.
Amadeus’s support is rated 3.84/5, with reviews noting responsiveness and helpfulness, but some users mention delays and system glitches. The onboarding process scores 4/5, indicating generally positive initial experiences, though some find ongoing support inconsistent.
BookingTek has no available recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to assess support quality. Given its SaaS model, support quality can be variable depending on implementation and user expectations.
Edge: Amadeus, with existing review data and a longer track record of support.
Amadeus integrates with over 104 verified partners, including prominent hotel systems like Opera, and offers an open API for customization. Shared integrations are minimal, but the breadth of partners supports complex operational needs.
BookingTek’s integration options are limited, with only Oracle MICROS Opera explicitly mentioned. The lack of available verified partners suggests fewer options for diverse hotel tech stacks.
Edge: Amadeus, for its extensive and verified integration ecosystem.
Amadeus has a 4.53/5 overall rating from 38 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its efficiency, reporting, and usability. Hotel segments like independent and branded hotels rate it even higher, at 4.61/5 and 4.69/5 respectively.
BookingTek, lacking recent reviews, has no available ratings or detailed hotel segment feedback. Its proven reputation and higher review count favor Amadeus.
Edge: Amadeus, with more recent, higher-rated reviews across diverse property types.
Both platforms do not publicly disclose specific pricing, and they do not offer free tiers or transparent monthly fees. Pricing is typically customized based on hotel size, number of users, and required features.
Given the absence of public pricing, your best approach is to request quotes directly from vendors, but note that Amadeus’s broader feature set likely comes with a higher investment.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, has straightforward booking needs, or limited IT support.
Not ideal if you need advanced event planning, detailed reporting, or multi-property management.
Amadeus Delphi offers a comprehensive, feature-rich solution tailored for larger or complex hotels needing detailed event and sales management. Its extensive integration options, support, and high review scores make it a more dependable choice for established properties with sophisticated needs.
BookingTek Meetings Maker excels in simplicity and speed. If your hotel’s priority is to quickly enable online meeting room bookings without the complexity of large systems, it offers a cost-effective, straightforward solution.
In summary, choose Amadeus if your hotel needs a full-scale event management platform with advanced features and integrations. Opt for BookingTek if your hotel values ease of use, quick setup, and direct online booking capabilities for smaller-scale meetings and room bookings.
活动管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Amadeus - Delphi® 和 Bookingtek (Meetings Maker) 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| BEO管理 | ||
| 失物招领模块 | ||
| 实时任务跟踪 | ||
| 延迟退房 | ||
| 虚拟日志 | ||
| 预防性维护模块 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 25 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Delphi 因其用户友好的界面而受到称赞,它使导航和管理各种任务变得容易。这种易用性对新员工很有帮助,并简化了日常操作,但一些用户认为系统可以从更现代的外... Delphi 因其用户友好的界面而受到称赞,它使导航和管理各种任务变得容易。这种易用性对新员工很有帮助,并简化了日常操作,但一些用户认为系统可以从更现代的外观中受益。
该系统用于管理客户关系和活动细节的工具广受好评。用户欣赏它如何让一切井然有序,并帮助跟踪销售线索和客户历史记录。
德尔福管理团体预订和预测收入的能力得到了重点关注。这有助于酒店优化会议空间和客房库存,为收入管理策略做出积极贡献。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户对某些集成表示不满,尤其是与 Opera 和其他系统的集成,导致中断。有些人提到系统运行缓慢,并出现技术故障。
用户发现报告工具使用频率很高,但指出需要改进速度和深度。系统生成各种报告的能力值得赞赏,尽管一些评论提到它可以更详细、更快速。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus - Delphi® 和 Bookingtek (Meetings Maker) 共享许多核心 Event Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus - Delphi® 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Bookingtek (Meetings Maker) 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Amadeus - Delphi® 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus - Delphi®:否。Bookingtek (Meetings Maker):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Event Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 76,BookingTek 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问