The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 289 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Amadeus 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.7/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile access on any device and Pace, Sales Activity, and GRC Reporting.
Tripleseat 表现出色 在 customer support and onboarding 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) .
基于 HTR 上 289 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 38 | 251 |
在分析了 289 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 易于使用, 客户联系和事件管理, 收益管理,而 Tripleseat 用户则强调 onboarding and support, event management efficiency, user-friendly interface。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
+
Onboarding and Support
▾
|
|
+
客户联系和事件管理
▾
|
+
Event Management Efficiency
▾
|
|
+
收益管理
▾
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
+
集中数据管理
▾
|
+
Platform Customization
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
集成和系统问题
▾
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
−
报告
▾
|
−
Proposal and Communication Tools
▾
|
|
−
培训与转型
▾
|
−
文档管理
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 活动管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #7 1 条评价 | #1 52 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #6 6 条评价 | #2 152 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 9 条评价 | #3 17 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 5 条评价 | #2 9 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #5 9 条评价 | #2 155 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 11 条评价 | #2 93 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 15 条评价 | #2 55 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #5 1 条评价 | #2 12 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 23 条评价 | #1 224 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #6 1 条评价 | #4 8 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #5 0 条评价 | #4 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Amadeus Delphi® and Tripleseat boils down to your hotel’s specific needs for event management. Both platforms solve core challenges like streamlining event booking, client communication, and resource planning, but they diverge significantly in their focus and capabilities. Amadeus offers a broad set of tools targeting large, complex operations, while Tripleseat emphasizes ease of use and rapid deployment for diverse hotel types.
If your hotel prioritizes a robust, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations and centralized data, Amadeus is a compelling choice. Conversely, if ease of onboarding, superior customer support, and a modern interface are critical, Tripleseat stands out. Are you ready to identify which platform aligns best with your operational goals?
Amadeus and Tripleseat both aim to simplify event and sales management, but their approaches differ. Amadeus emphasizes detailed, customizable workflows suited for large-scale or multi-property hotels, whereas Tripleseat focuses on intuitive interfaces and quick setup, ideal for boutique and mid-sized properties.
Review data shows Tripleseat’s 219 reviews with a 4.78/5 rating and recent feedback from 62 reviews in the last six months reinforce its current relevance. Amadeus, with just 38 reviews, has a slightly lower rating at 4.53/5, and no recent reviews suggest its user base may be less active or smaller now. Given the recency and volume, Tripleseat’s standing is stronger, making it the more current choice.
If your hotel needs a flexible, easy-to-use platform with excellent customer support and rapid deployment, go with Tripleseat. Its intuitive interface and dedicated support team make onboarding straightforward, especially for boutique, independent, or smaller group hotels.
If your hotel requires advanced features such as comprehensive event check-in management, real-time task tracking, or multi-property monitoring, Amadeus is the better fit. It also offers more integrations (104 verified partners) and features like a deep cleaning module and analytics dashboard, making it suitable for larger, full-service hotels seeking detailed control.
Ease of use is a critical factor, and in this area, Amadeus scores 4.57/5 based on recent reviews, with many users citing its user-friendly interface and helpful onboarding. Despite some reports of slow reports and system glitches, overall, new users find its navigation manageable after initial training.
Tripleseat scores slightly lower at 4.53/5, with reviewers emphasizing its intuitive design and quick setup process. Its platform is praised for being straightforward, especially for teams without extensive technical resources.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus offers 26 unique features, including BEO management, real-time task tracking, a lost & found module, preventative maintenance, and a deep cleaning module—capabilities that Tripleseat lacks. These features support complex, large-scale event planning and operational oversight, which are beneficial for full-service hotels or resorts.
Tripleseat provides 11 core shared features like lead management, client communication, and proposal creation. While its features cover essential event management needs, it lacks the advanced modules found in Amadeus.
Edge: Amadeus.
Tripleseat’s support team earns a 4.55/5 rating, with reviews highlighting quick response times, helpful assistance, and ongoing education. Users mention support staff as “responsive,” “friendly,” and “dedicated,” which translates to smoother onboarding and issue resolution.
Amadeus, with a 3.84/5 rating, has mixed reviews, with some users citing delays and system glitches affecting their experience. While some appreciate its interface, many note that support could be more responsive and proactive.
Edge: Tripleseat.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified integration partners, including major PMS, CRM, and payment providers, supporting extensive connectivity across hotel systems. Many of these integrations, like Opera, Mews, and Tripleseat, are shared, but Amadeus’s broader partner network provides greater flexibility.
Tripleseat has only 15 verified integrations, mainly focusing on sales, marketing, and basic property management tools. Its narrower ecosystem limits connectivity options, especially for larger operations needing comprehensive system integration.
Edge: Amadeus.
Tripleseat’s recent reviews—62 in the last six months—show a consistently high satisfaction rate with an overall rating of 4.78/5. Hotelier feedback highlights its ease of use, excellent support, and ability to streamline event operations.
Amadeus’s 38 reviews yield a 4.53/5 rating, but the absence of recent feedback diminishes confidence. User comments often mention system sluggishness and support concerns, indicating less current customer satisfaction.
Edge: Tripleseat.
Amadeus does not publicly list its pricing, indicating a customized quote based on hotel size and needs, and it does not offer a free trial. Its implementation and licensing costs are typically higher, reflecting its enterprise-level capabilities.
Tripleseat charges a flat monthly fee of $400, with no mention of setup fees or hidden costs. Its straightforward pricing model makes it easier for hotels to budget without surprises, especially for mid-sized properties.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, requires simple event management, or has limited technical resources.
Not ideal if your hotel needs complex workflows, extensive integrations, or detailed operational modules.
The core difference lies in scope: Amadeus offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform suited for large, multi-property hotels, while Tripleseat provides an intuitive, easy-to-deploy solution aimed at boutique and mid-sized hotels.
Choose Amadeus if you require advanced features like deep cleaning, analytics, and extensive integrations, and your hotel has resources for implementation. Opt for Tripleseat if you want a straightforward, supportive platform that integrates well with your existing tools and supports rapid onboarding.
For hotels valuing modern usability and recent customer feedback, Tripleseat is the stronger option. If your hotel’s operations demand detailed control and extensive system connectivity, Amadeus remains the more capable choice, despite its slower recent review pace.
This comparison aims to clarify your decision by focusing on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and strategic priorities. Both platforms serve the event management space well, but your specific needs should drive your final choice.
活动管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $400/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Amadeus - Delphi® 和 Tripleseat 共享 11 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| BEO管理 | ||
| 失物招领模块 | ||
| 实时任务跟踪 | ||
| 延迟退房 | ||
| 虚拟日志 | ||
| 预防性维护模块 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 14 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Tripleseat provides the best ROI of any system."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Delphi 因其用户友好的界面而受到称赞,它使导航和管理各种任务变得容易。这种易用性对新员工很有帮助,并简化了日常操作,但一些用户认为系统可以从更现代的外... Delphi 因其用户友好的界面而受到称赞,它使导航和管理各种任务变得容易。这种易用性对新员工很有帮助,并简化了日常操作,但一些用户认为系统可以从更现代的外观中受益。
该系统用于管理客户关系和活动细节的工具广受好评。用户欣赏它如何让一切井然有序,并帮助跟踪销售线索和客户历史记录。
德尔福管理团体预订和预测收入的能力得到了重点关注。这有助于酒店优化会议空间和客房库存,为收入管理策略做出积极贡献。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户对某些集成表示不满,尤其是与 Opera 和其他系统的集成,导致中断。有些人提到系统运行缓慢,并出现技术故障。
用户发现报告工具使用频率很高,但指出需要改进速度和深度。系统生成各种报告的能力值得赞赏,尽管一些评论提到它可以更详细、更快速。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Despite some initial onboarding challenges, users commend the support team for their responsiveness and effectiveness in solving issues and providing... Despite some initial onboarding challenges, users commend the support team for their responsiveness and effectiveness in solving issues and providing assistance throughout the setup process.
Tripleseat is praised for streamlining event management, making it easier to handle communication, details, and coordination across teams, leading to... Tripleseat is praised for streamlining event management, making it easier to handle communication, details, and coordination across teams, leading to time savings and better team alignment.
Reviewers consistently mention the ease of use and intuitive design of Tripleseat, highlighting its capacity to simplify complex tasks and improve use... Reviewers consistently mention the ease of use and intuitive design of Tripleseat, highlighting its capacity to simplify complex tasks and improve user experience for both clients and staff.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
While users appreciate the platform's core features, they express a desire for better integration with other systems like revenue management tools and... While users appreciate the platform's core features, they express a desire for better integration with other systems like revenue management tools and billing to enhance overall workflow efficiency.
Tripleseat simplifies creating proposals and facilitates consistent client communication with features like integrated communication tools and real-ti... Tripleseat simplifies creating proposals and facilitates consistent client communication with features like integrated communication tools and real-time updates across platforms.
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus - Delphi® 和 Tripleseat 共享许多核心 Event Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus - Delphi® 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Tripleseat 提供 15 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Amadeus - Delphi® 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus - Delphi®:否。Tripleseat:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Event Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 76,Tripleseat 的为 97。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问