The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 38 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Amadeus 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.7/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile access on any device and Pace, Sales Activity, and GRC Reporting.
EMS Software 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 38 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 38 | 0 |
在分析了 38 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 易于使用, 客户联系和事件管理, 收益管理,而 EMS Software 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
客户联系和事件管理
▾
|
|
|
+
收益管理
▾
|
|
|
+
集中数据管理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
集成和系统问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告
▾
|
|
|
−
培训与转型
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 活动管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #7 1 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #6 6 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 9 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #5 9 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 11 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 15 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #5 1 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 23 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 | #6 1 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #5 0 条评价 | — |
When choosing between Amadeus Delphi® and EMS Event Management, your hotel needs to evaluate how each platform addresses your core event and sales management challenges. Delphi offers a comprehensive suite tailored to hotel-specific needs, especially for larger properties, while EMS focuses on streamlined space management for organizations with complex scheduling demands. Both aim to improve operational efficiency, but their capabilities and target users differ significantly.
Are you looking for a hotel-centric system with extensive features and industry-specific integrations, or a flexible platform that can handle complex event scheduling across multiple types of organizations?
Both Delphi and EMS aim to streamline event planning and management, but they serve different hotel profiles. Delphi’s core strength lies in its deep integration with hospitality systems, robust sales and event tools, and extensive feature set designed specifically for hotels and resorts. EMS, on the other hand, is more generalized, focusing on space and resource management suitable for large enterprises, educational institutions, and corporations.
While Delphi has a higher rating (4.53/5 from 38 reviews) and more recent feedback, EMS’s reviews are non-existent, making its performance and suitability less certain. Delphi’s user reviews highlight its customizable reporting, strong client relationship tools, and multi-property monitoring, which are crucial for hotel operations. Conversely, EMS’s appeal is its simplicity and rapid scheduling, which could be attractive for organizations with less complex hotel event needs.
Given the review count and recency favoring Delphi, it clearly has a stronger reputation in the hotel industry. Are you willing to risk a platform with no recent reviews, or do you prefer a tested and highly-rated system designed with hospitality in mind?
If your hotel needs a platform tailored specifically to hospitality, with features like BEO management, real-time task tracking, and deep integration with existing PMS and POS systems, Delphi is the better choice. Its extensive feature set, including modules for banquet checks, contract management, and customer relationship tools, makes it ideal for full-service hotels and resorts.
If your hotel primarily requires a straightforward solution for managing event spaces, booking rooms, and coordinating resources without the need for specialized hospitality features, EMS might suffice. However, keep in mind that EMS lacks comprehensive reviews or indications of hotel-specific integrations, making it less proven in this context.
For most hotels, especially those in the luxury, branded, or multi-property segments, Delphi’s proven track record and extensive hotel-focused features outweigh EMS’s more generic approach.
Edge: Amadeus Delphi®
Based on user reviews, Delphi scores a high 4.57/5 for ease of use, with many praising its intuitive interface and straightforward navigation. Users mention that onboarding is smooth, and daily operations become efficient quickly, thanks to its familiar interface and helpful reporting tools.
EMS, lacking detailed review data, makes it difficult to assess its user experience. However, its emphasis on simplicity suggests it might be easier to adopt initially, especially for organizations with less complex needs.
Considering the available data, Delphi’s high ease-of-use rating and positive user feedback give it a clear advantage. Edge: Amadeus Delphi®
Delphi offers 37 unique features, including BEO management, lost & found modules, real-time task tracking, virtual logbook, preventative maintenance, deep cleaning, inspection, and extensive reporting options. These features cater specifically to hotel operations, enabling detailed management of guest, event, and property needs.
EMS’s feature set is not explicitly detailed, but it emphasizes space management, resource booking, and scheduling, with no indication of hotel-specific modules. Its focus appears to be on general event scheduling rather than comprehensive hotel operation support.
Given the detailed feature list for Delphi and its tailored capabilities, it significantly outperforms EMS in scope. Edge: Amadeus Delphi®
Delphi has a customer support rating of 3.84/5 from user reviews, with comments indicating that support is generally responsive but can be inconsistent. Some users mention delays in support response times and technical glitches affecting their experience.
EMS, with no recent reviews or support ratings available, leaves its support quality unverified. Its lack of reported support issues may suggest a less complex platform, but this also makes it harder to evaluate.
Based on Delphi’s verifiable support ratings and feedback, it remains the more reliable choice for hotel teams seeking assistance. Edge: Amadeus Delphi®
Delphi boasts an impressive 104 verified integrations with popular hospitality, financial, and operational systems, including Opera, Micros, and various marketing platforms. These integrations enable seamless data sharing, automation, and operational efficiency specific to hotels.
EMS has no listed verified integrations, which could limit its ability to connect with your existing hotel technology stack. This makes Delphi preferable for hotels aiming for a connected, integrated workflow.
Edge: Amadeus Delphi®
With a score of 4.53/5 from 38 reviews, Delphi is highly rated among hotel operators, especially in the independent and branded hotel segments. Its recent reviews reinforce its status as a trusted, hotel-focused solution, with users emphasizing its functionality, reliability, and value.
EMS offers no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to assess its reception among hotel professionals. Its lack of feedback suggests less proven adoption in the hotel industry.
Therefore, Delphi’s higher ratings and recent positive reviews make it the more trusted solution. Edge: Amadeus Delphi®
Both platforms do not publicly disclose detailed pricing or subscription models. Delphi’s high costs are implied by its extensive features and industry-specific focus, often translating into a significant investment.
EMS’s pricing is not available, but the absence of detailed information suggests it might be more affordable or targeted toward organizations with simpler needs. Still, without clear data, making a direct comparison is impossible.
Given Delphi’s established presence and more comprehensive feature set, most hotels should anticipate a higher price point.
Not ideal if your property is small, budget-constrained, or requires only basic event scheduling without hospitality-specific features.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on integrated sales, CRM, or specialized hospitality modules, as EMS lacks these capabilities.
Delphi is a comprehensive, hotel-centric event and sales management platform with proven success, extensive features, and solid user ratings. Its deep integrations and tailored functionalities make it ideal for full-service hotels, resorts, and multi-property groups seeking operational excellence.
EMS offers a streamlined solution focusing on space management and scheduling, suitable mostly for organizations outside the hospitality niche or hotels with minimal event management needs. Its lack of recent hotel-specific reviews and integrations limits its appeal for most hoteliers.
If your hotel values industry-specific tools and proven performance, Delphi is the clear choice. If your needs are simple, and you prioritize quick setup, EMS might suffice, but it remains untested in the hotel environment.
Final Recommendation: For most hotels, especially those in branded, luxury, or multi-property segments, Amadeus Delphi®’s extensive features and strong reputation make it the smarter investment.
活动管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Amadeus - Delphi® 和 EMS Event Management 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| BEO管理 | ||
| 失物招领模块 | ||
| 实时任务跟踪 | ||
| 延迟退房 | ||
| 虚拟日志 | ||
| 预防性维护模块 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 25 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Delphi 因其用户友好的界面而受到称赞,它使导航和管理各种任务变得容易。这种易用性对新员工很有帮助,并简化了日常操作,但一些用户认为系统可以从更现代的外... Delphi 因其用户友好的界面而受到称赞,它使导航和管理各种任务变得容易。这种易用性对新员工很有帮助,并简化了日常操作,但一些用户认为系统可以从更现代的外观中受益。
该系统用于管理客户关系和活动细节的工具广受好评。用户欣赏它如何让一切井然有序,并帮助跟踪销售线索和客户历史记录。
德尔福管理团体预订和预测收入的能力得到了重点关注。这有助于酒店优化会议空间和客房库存,为收入管理策略做出积极贡献。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户对某些集成表示不满,尤其是与 Opera 和其他系统的集成,导致中断。有些人提到系统运行缓慢,并出现技术故障。
用户发现报告工具使用频率很高,但指出需要改进速度和深度。系统生成各种报告的能力值得赞赏,尽管一些评论提到它可以更详细、更快速。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus - Delphi® 和 EMS Event Management 共享许多核心 Event Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus - Delphi® 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 EMS Event Management 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Amadeus - Delphi® 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus - Delphi®:否。EMS Event Management:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Event Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 76,EMS Software 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问