The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客户关系管理与电子邮件营销 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #29 0 条评价 | #13 6 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #20 7 条评价 | #11 21 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #14 5 条评价 | #18 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #16 0 条评价 | #21 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #22 2 条评价 | #11 19 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #19 5 条评价 | #14 13 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #18 5 条评价 | #14 11 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #17 2 条评价 | #18 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #12 5 条评价 | #8 14 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #18 3 条评价 | #15 12 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #12 0 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | — | #6 3 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel CRM & email marketing platform is crucial for your hotel's guest engagement and revenue growth. Amadeus and SHR Group both aim to streamline guest relationships, but they diverge significantly in maturity, user feedback, and feature depth. While Amadeus offers a broad suite with a focus on personalization, SHR Group emphasizes interconnected tools and high-quality support. Which product aligns best with your current needs and future plans?
Both Amadeus and SHR Group target hotelier needs around guest management and marketing automation, but their approaches differ. Amadeus provides a comprehensive CRM with extra features like segmentation and guest feedback modules, aiming to boost loyalty and revenue. SHR Group offers a tightly integrated system that emphasizes operational efficiency, guest engagement, and loyalty through its interconnected suite. Given SHR’s higher recent review scores and more recent feedback, it’s clear that hotel operators are currently more satisfied with SHR. Are you prioritizing a mature, feature-rich platform or a highly rated, user-friendly solution?
If your hotel needs a modern, easy-to-use platform with high customer support ratings, SHR Group is the clear choice. It’s favored by users across segments—especially boutique and luxury hotels—for its intuitive interface, rapid support, and interconnected modules that simplify daily operations. On the other hand, if your hotel prioritizes a broad, established platform with advanced marketing automation, Amadeus’s system might appeal, but its user ratings and recent reviews are lower. For most hotels actively seeking high support and quick adoption, SHR Group holds the edge.
Amadeus scores a modest 3.38 out of 5 for ease of use, with some reviewers citing a steeper learning curve and reporting that certain modules, like reporting and templates, are not user-friendly. Its onboarding process is rated at 3.33, which indicates room for improvement in support during initial setup. Conversely, SHR Group boasts a high 4.77 rating for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive interface, straightforward workflows, and quick onboarding process rated at 4.83. Hotels frequently mention the support team’s responsiveness and helpfulness.
Edge: SHR Group.
Amadeus offers three features not found in SHR Group: segmentation, marketing automation, and a guest feedback module. These tools enable targeted campaigns, guest reviews collection, and automated marketing flows—valuable for loyalty and reputation management. SHR Group has three unique features: database health monitoring, PCI compliance, and attribute-based segmentation, which bolster data security and granular targeting. Both systems share 21 core features, but SHR’s additional features cater more directly to operational and guest engagement needs. When considering feature depth, SHR’s broader interconnected suite is more appealing, but Amadeus’s marketing automation is notable.
Edge: SHR Group.
Customer support ratings favor SHR Group significantly, with a 4.92 out of 5 score compared to Amadeus’s 3.58. Reviews highlight SHR’s personable, knowledgeable team, quick responses, and proactive support, making onboarding and troubleshooting smoother. Amadeus’s support is rated at 3.58, with some comments about slower response times and room for improvement. Many hoteliers describe SHR’s support as “fantastic,” whereas Amadeus’s support is seen as more inconsistent.
Edge: SHR Group.
Amadeus integrates with 104 verified partners, considerably more than SHR Group’s 81. Shared integrations include familiar vendors like Priority Software, WebRezPro, and Cendyn, providing extensive options for property management, distribution, and marketing. Amadeus’s larger partner network offers broader reach for integrations, but SHR Group’s integrated modules reduce the need for external connectors in many cases. If extensive third-party integrations are a priority, Amadeus has the edge; for streamlined workflows, SHR’s existing ecosystem may suffice.
Edge: Amadeus.
SHR Group receives higher recent review scores, with a 9.69 out of 10 NPS and 96% likelihood to recommend, compared to Amadeus’s 7.31 and 79%. The reviews in the last six months are more recent for SHR, strengthening confidence in its current performance. Hotels across segments, especially boutique and luxury hotels, rate SHR’s user experience, support, and overall satisfaction more highly. While Amadeus has a broader global presence, SHR’s recent ratings reflect a more favorable user sentiment.
Edge: SHR Group.
Both products do not publicly list explicit pricing details, and neither offers a freemium or fixed monthly fee. Costs are likely based on custom quotes, typically reflecting hotel size and feature needs. Your team will need to contact each vendor for precise quotes and evaluate based on the value delivered.
Not ideal if you prioritize quick onboarding or high user satisfaction, given Amadeus’s lower recent review scores and onboarding ratings.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on extensive third-party integrations or needs a platform with a long-established global footprint.
Amadeus is a broad, established platform offering extensive features like segmentation, marketing automation, and guest feedback modules. Its larger integration network makes it suitable for large, complex properties that can leverage these tools, but recent reviews suggest support and ease of use lag behind SHR Group’s offerings.
For hotels seeking high satisfaction, modern design, and rapid support, SHR Group is the better choice. Its user-friendly interface, connected modules, and highly positive recent reviews make it ideal for hotels prioritizing operational simplicity and guest engagement.
In summary, if your hotel values proven stability, extensive integrations, and advanced marketing tools, Amadeus remains a strong option. However, for most hotels focused on support quality, ease of use, and recent high ratings, SHR Group stands out as the better fit today.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
评论经常称赞 SHR Group 出色的客户服务。用户强调支持团队的响应能力、专业性和乐于助人,使实施和持续使用更加顺畅。值得一提的是,他们称赞了特定的客户经理... 评论经常称赞 SHR Group 出色的客户服务。用户强调支持团队的响应能力、专业性和乐于助人,使实施和持续使用更加顺畅。值得一提的是,他们称赞了特定的客户经理和支持人员。
CRM 系统因其管理价格、套餐和数据分析的工具而受到称赞,丰富了客人体验并促进了营销。一些反馈建议采用更现代的设计来增强用户界面。
SHR Group 的营销工具(包括 CRM 和电子邮件)因能提高客户参与度和运营效率而备受推崇。用户对其在推动直接预订和节省佣金成本方面的功能表示赞赏。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户注意到开发和更新的延迟,这与最近的收购有关,这减缓了新功能实现和增强的进度。
虽然 SHR Group 工具的功能受到称赞,但一些评论表示需要更直观、更现代的用户界面,特别是 CRS 和 CRM 方面,以满足不同技术水平的用户的需求。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – Guest Management Solutions 和 SHR Customer Relationship Management (CRM) 共享许多核心 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – Guest Management Solutions 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 SHR Customer Relationship Management (CRM) 提供 81 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。SHR Customer Relationship Management (CRM) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 3.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – Guest Management Solutions:否。SHR Customer Relationship Management (CRM):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel CRM & Email Marketing 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 0,SHR Group 的为 34。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问