The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 53 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Amadeus 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Reporting Dashboard and Guest profiles.
book my booking 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 53 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 53 | 0 |
在分析了 53 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 集成和可用性, 创新与更新, 分析和报告,而 book my booking 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
book my booking |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
集成和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
创新与更新
▾
|
|
|
+
分析和报告
▾
|
|
|
+
收入和定价策略
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
客户支持
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店预订软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
book my booking |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #8 7 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #5 24 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 10 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #4 3 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
book my booking |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 18 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #6 17 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 16 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
book my booking |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #5 13 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #4 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #3 4 条评价 | — |
When evaluating hotel reservations systems, your main concern is often balancing functionality, ease of use, support, and cost. Amadeus’s iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) provides a comprehensive suite aimed at mid-sized to large hotels seeking broad distribution and detailed analytics, while book my booking offers a minimal, less established alternative with no available reviews or features. Which product aligns better with your hotel’s growth plans and operational needs?
Amadeus’s product addresses complex distribution, revenue management, and integration needs with a proven track record and extensive regional presence. Meanwhile, book my booking lacks review data, features, or regional reach, raising questions about its suitability and reliability. Are you willing to trust a newer, unreviewed platform, or prefer a solution with a proven track record and more extensive support?
Amadeus’s iHotelier is designed to serve hotels of all sizes but is especially popular among mid-scale and larger properties seeking robust channel management, dynamic pricing, and extensive integration options—evidenced by its 104 verified partners and wide regional coverage. It caters to hotels that want a centralized system capable of handling multi-property operations, rich analytics, and detailed control over rates and inventory.
In contrast, book my booking is a relatively obscure platform with no reviews, no listed features, and no regional presence. Its limited disclosed capabilities make it difficult to assess whether it can support your hotel’s needs, particularly if you require reliable distribution, automation, or revenue tools. Do you want a trusted platform with a large user base or experiment with an unproven solution?
Given Amadeus’s extensive review data, recent feedback, and international presence, it clearly has more credibility. While both aim to manage reservations, Amadeus’s reputation and comprehensive features make it the safer choice for hotels aiming for scale.
If your hotel needs a proven, feature-rich CRS with extensive integration, advanced revenue management, and support across multiple regions, go with Amadeus. Its 52 reviews with a 4.57/5 overall rating and recent feedback indicate it’s trusted by many hoteliers who value its channel management, reporting, and customization options.
If your hotel is smaller, or if you prefer a platform with no reviews and uncertain capabilities, you might consider book my booking. However, the lack of reviews, features, and regional presence strongly suggests it’s untested and unlikely to meet complex hotel needs. For most hotels actively seeking growth and reliable support, Amadeus remains the better choice.
Amadeus’s iHotelier scores 4.43/5 for ease of use, with positive reviews highlighting its user-friendly interface once familiar, and effective onboarding processes. Users mention that although initial setup can be complex, daily operation becomes intuitive, especially with proper training.
Conversely, book my booking provides no publicly available review data or user feedback, making it impossible to evaluate its usability. The absence of reviews on ease of use or onboarding indicates uncertainty and potential risk.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus offers 18 distinct features including booking engine, channel management, reporting dashboards, metasearch connectivity, content management, RMS connectivity, geotargeted pricing, dynamic pricing, multi-property management, PMS integration, guest profiles, and flexible rate support. These features align with the needs of hotels seeking automation, customization, and comprehensive control.
book my booking provides no documented features or capabilities. Without an explicit feature set, it’s impossible to compare, but the absence of information suggests it’s unlikely to match Amadeus’s breadth and depth.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s support scores 4.15/5, with reviews praising their helpful, professional service, and responsiveness. Hoteliers appreciate the detailed training and ongoing assistance, though some mention delays and the need for more localized support.
There are no available reviews or support ratings for book my booking, leaving its support quality unverified. Given the critical nature of CRS support, this lack of data favors Amadeus.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified partners, including major GDS, OTA, and PMS platforms like Yanolja Cloud Solution, Priority Software, Uniguest, and others. This extensive network facilitates seamless distribution, reporting, and operational workflows.
book my booking has only one verified partner, with no additional integrations documented. This severely limits its potential for broad distribution or connectivity, making Amadeus the clear leader.
Edge: Amadeus.
With 52 recent reviews averaging 4.57/5, Amadeus’s platform is widely praised for its comprehensive functionality, ease of operation, and customer support. Hotels across segments, especially independent and boutique properties, report high satisfaction levels.
In contrast, book my booking has no reviews or ratings, so we cannot gauge user satisfaction or property-specific feedback.
Edge: Amadeus.
Pricing details for Amadeus are not publicly disclosed; it typically involves custom quotes based on hotel size and needs. Implementation fees and monthly subscription costs are generally negotiated during sales discussions.
For book my booking, no pricing information is available, and no trial or demo details are provided. This opacity makes it difficult to assess value or affordability.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small or local, or if you prefer a simple, low-cost solution with minimal setup.
Not ideal if your hotel needs integration with GDS, extensive reporting, or multi-channel management, given the lack of available features or reviews.
Amadeus offers a comprehensive, validated platform trusted by over 50 hotels, with recent positive reviews confirming its value for mid-sized and large properties. Its broad feature set, extensive integrations, and regional presence make it suitable for hotels aiming to grow and optimize their distribution and revenue.
In contrast, book my booking provides no reviews, features, or regional footprint. Its unverified status and limited information suggest it’s an untested, risky choice unlikely to meet the complex needs of most hotels.
If you value proven performance, extensive support, and reliable integrations, Amadeus is the clear choice. Only if your hotel is extremely small, local, or budget-constrained without plans for growth should you consider unreviewed, unproven alternatives like book my booking.
酒店预订软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
book my booking |
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 和 book my booking 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
book my booking |
|---|---|---|
| 元搜索连接 | ||
| 内容管理 | ||
| 呼叫中心功能 | ||
| 报告仪表板 | ||
| 渠道管理和OTA分销 | ||
| 预订引擎 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 6 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因与各种渠道、GDS 和 Opera 等 PMS 系统无缝集成而受到称赞。然而,人们对复杂的 OTA Sync 实现以及平台需要变得更加用户友好表示担忧。一些评论强... TravelClick 因与各种渠道、GDS 和 Opera 等 PMS 系统无缝集成而受到称赞。然而,人们对复杂的 OTA Sync 实现以及平台需要变得更加用户友好表示担忧。一些评论强调了较长的集成时间和一些需要改进的可用性挑战。
对于平台的创新和持续更新,人们的评价褒贬不一。一些用户对平台频繁的改进和新功能表示赞赏,而另一些人则认为,某些方面(如 iHotelier CRS)需要进行更重大的... 对于平台的创新和持续更新,人们的评价褒贬不一。一些用户对平台频繁的改进和新功能表示赞赏,而另一些人则认为,某些方面(如 iHotelier CRS)需要进行更重大的更新,才能保持与时俱进和直观。
TravelClick 中的分析和报告工具因其跟踪绩效和做出明智决策的能力而受到酒店经营者的高度重视。用户强调详细的商业智能报告和市场情报功能是战略制定的关键组成... TravelClick 中的分析和报告工具因其跟踪绩效和做出明智决策的能力而受到酒店经营者的高度重视。用户强调详细的商业智能报告和市场情报功能是战略制定的关键组成部分。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 的客户支持普遍受到好评,因为它乐于助人、专业且高效。一些评论指出了支持团队的响应能力和乐于助人,但也提到了回复延迟和培训不足。评论还强调了... TravelClick 的客户支持普遍受到好评,因为它乐于助人、专业且高效。一些评论指出了支持团队的响应能力和乐于助人,但也提到了回复延迟和培训不足。评论还强调了在各个地区提供本地支持和更多培训选项的必要性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 和 book my booking 共享许多核心 Hotel Reservations Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 book my booking 提供 1 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.4/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS):否。book my booking:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Reservations Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 79,book my booking 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问