项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 76 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Amadeus 在集成和可用性方面表现出色,尤其适合市中心住宿设施(4.6/5),并拥有报告仪表板以及客人资料等独家功能。
GuestCentric 在客户支持以及性价比方面表现出色,尤其适合豪华住宿设施(4.9/5)。
基于 HTR 上 76 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 联系销售 | 联系销售 |
| 经验证的评价 | 53 | 23 |
在分析了 76 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 集成和可用性, 创新与更新, 分析和报告,而 GuestCentric 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
集成和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
创新与更新
▾
|
|
|
+
分析和报告
▾
|
|
|
+
收入和定价策略
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
客户支持
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店预订软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #8 8 条评价 | #3 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #6 23 条评价 | #7 5 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 12 条评价 | #10 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #4 2 条评价 | #6 1 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #7 19 条评价 | #5 11 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #6 18 条评价 | #7 8 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 16 条评价 | #7 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 5 条评价 | #3 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #5 13 条评价 | #15 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #6 12 条评价 | #15 17 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #4 4 条评价 | #13 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | #3 4 条评价 | #11 0 条评价 |
Amadeus iHotelier and GuestCentric CRS diverge primarily in their scale, feature set, and geographic footprint. Amadeus iHotelier is a global solution supporting 29 countries with 107 verified integrations, suited for mid-scale to large hotels and multi-property groups needing extensive distribution channels and advanced revenue management. GuestCentric, with 45 integrations and presence in 3 countries, appeals more to boutique and smaller independent hotels focused on direct booking conversion.
Both products centralize reservation management and automate booking distribution, addressing the core challenge of reducing dependency on OTAs while maximizing direct revenue. They streamline rates, inventory, and booking data to improve operational efficiency at the front desk and revenue teams. However, Amadeus offers a broader toolset for complex operations, whereas GuestCentric emphasizes simplicity and user experience.
If your property is a mid-size or large hotel, a branded chain, or operates multiple properties across regions, choose Amadeus iHotelier. This recommendation rests on 53 detailed reviews highlighting its robust channel management, multi-property support, extensive integrations, and advanced pricing tools like geotargeted pricing and dynamic pricing. Amadeus’s presence in 29 countries and its use by city center, branded, and airport/conference hotels with ratings between 4.3 to 4.6 further support this fit.
If you run a boutique, bed & breakfast, or small independent hotel, especially in Europe or targeted niche markets, GuestCentric CRS fits better. With 23 recent reviews, GuestCentric scores higher (4.7/5 overall) in ease of use (4.6 vs 4.4) and customer support (4.8 vs 4.2), which are critical for smaller teams. Its user base largely comprises boutique hotels (42%) and B&Bs (17%) with segment ratings up to 4.9/5, indicating strong satisfaction in this segment. Note, however, GuestCentric lacks recent review data, so some performance aspects may be less current.
GuestCentric edges out Amadeus in ease of use and onboarding with ratings of 4.6 and 4.6, compared to Amadeus’s 4.4 and 4.1. Reviewers consistently praise GuestCentric for a user-friendly platform requiring fewer clicks and intuitive workflows that reduce front-desk training time. For example, one user noted less complexity in booking management, which is vital for small properties with limited staff.
Amadeus users report a steeper learning curve initially but acknowledge that daily use becomes friendly and helpful. The system’s depth and multi-channel capabilities contribute to initial complexity, especially for new users without dedicated revenue management teams. Both products have no recent reviews in the last six months, so ratings reflect historical experience.
Edge: GuestCentric.
Amadeus iHotelier offers 18 hotel-specific features that GuestCentric lacks, including a booking engine, channel management, OTA distribution, metasearch connectivity, call center functionality, dynamic pricing, multi-property management, PMS connectivity, centralized user and role management, and guest profiles. These features allow hotels to automate distribution across dozens of channels, manage rates dynamically, and integrate deeply with PMS and RMS systems like Opera.
GuestCentric does not list unique features beyond the shared core reservation capabilities. This limits operational workflows such as multi-property rate parity, advanced revenue management, and call center booking management that are essential for larger or branded hotels. For smaller independents focused on direct bookings, GuestCentric’s streamlined feature set may suffice.
Edge: Amadeus iHotelier.
GuestCentric leads in customer support ratings with 4.8 overall and 4.6 for onboarding, compared to Amadeus’s 4.2 and 4.1. GuestCentric reviewers highlight proactive, always available support that successfully resolves issues and helps implement custom needs. One reviewer called their team "amazing" and noted the perfect match of tool and service.
Amadeus support is generally rated professional and efficient but receives mixed feedback on responsiveness and training depth. Four of 17 negative Amadeus reviews mention slow or ineffective communication, and a few users report account managers lacking product knowledge. These issues impact front desk and revenue teams requiring timely support during rate changes or channel updates.
Edge: GuestCentric.
Amadeus has 107 verified integrations, more than double GuestCentric’s 45, with 23 shared partners including industry staples like WebRezPro, SiteMinder, and Oracle Hospitality. Amadeus uniquely integrates with major RMS providers, metasearch engines, and call center platforms, supporting complex multi-channel distribution and revenue management automation.
GuestCentric’s unique integrations focus on channel managers like Omnibees and marketing tools like Triptease, suitable for smaller hotels prioritizing direct booking growth. Amadeus’s broader integration ecosystem benefits properties requiring seamless connections with PMS, RMS, GDS, and third-party revenue tools.
Edge: Amadeus iHotelier.
GuestCentric rates higher overall at 4.7/5 from 23 reviews versus Amadeus’s 4.4/5 from 53 reviews. This margin exceeds the 0.3 threshold for a rating edge. GuestCentric also scores higher in likelihood to recommend (94% vs 87%) and across key segments such as boutique hotels (4.9 vs 4.6) and luxury hotels (4.9 vs 4.1).
Amadeus holds strong segment ratings in city center hotels (4.6) and airport/conference hotels (4.5) with more reviews per segment, indicating reliable performance in larger or branded properties. GuestCentric’s data is thinner and less current, lacking recent reviews in the last six months, which may temper confidence in the latest product iteration.
Edge: GuestCentric.
Neither Amadeus iHotelier nor GuestCentric publish base prices, monthly flat fees, or per-room pricing publicly. Both require custom quotes and have no freemium or trial offerings. There is no implementation fee disclosed for either product. Hotels must engage sales teams for tailored pricing based on property size and service scope.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Amadeus iHotelier and GuestCentric CRS serve distinct segments with different operational needs. Amadeus excels as a comprehensive CRS for mid-scale to large hotels and multi-property groups needing extensive channel distribution, advanced pricing tools, and deep integrations. GuestCentric focuses on small boutique and independent hotels emphasizing ease of use, direct booking conversion, and responsive support.
Choose Amadeus if your hotel requires multi-channel automation, dynamic pricing, and integration with PMS and RMS systems like Opera, supported by 107 verified partners. Its broader feature set enables complex workflows and centralized control at scale. The 53 reviews affirm its strength in branded and city-center hotels with ratings around 4.4/5.
Choose GuestCentric if you run a boutique or small independent hotel prioritizing an intuitive interface and exceptional customer support. Its 23 reviews average 4.7/5 with strong scores for onboarding and ease of use, reflecting suitability for teams with fewer resources focused on direct bookings. However, its smaller integration network and limited advanced features restrict use in larger operations.
This comparison clarifies that Amadeus iHotelier is a fit for hotels requiring operational depth and geographic reach, while GuestCentric CRS suits properties valuing simplicity and support. The choice depends on your hotel's size, complexity, and distribution strategy.
酒店预订软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
内容管理
|
|
|
| 内容管理 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
|
▾
定价规则
|
|
|
| 地理定位定价模块 | ||
| 支持每周和每月费率 | ||
| 动态定价 | ||
| 可用性管理 | ||
| 预订规则 | ||
| 取消政策 | ||
| TMC管理 | ||
| 移动应用程序 | ||
|
▾
分配
|
|
|
| 元搜索连接 | ||
| 渠道管理和OTA分销 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| TMC管理 | ||
|
▾
电子商务
|
|
|
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 退款凭证 | ||
|
▾
集成
|
|
|
| RMS 连接性 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
| 元搜索连接 | ||
|
▾
报告
|
|
|
| 多物业管理 | ||
| 报告仪表板 | ||
| 报告仪表板 | ||
| 移动应用程序 | ||
|
▾
行政
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多物业管理 | ||
| 移动应用程序 | ||
|
▾
呼叫中心
|
|
|
| 呼叫中心功能 |
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因与各种渠道、GDS 和 Opera 等 PMS 系统无缝集成而受到称赞。然而,人们对复杂的 OTA Sync 实现以及平台需要变得更加用户友好表示担忧。一些评论强... TravelClick 因与各种渠道、GDS 和 Opera 等 PMS 系统无缝集成而受到称赞。然而,人们对复杂的 OTA Sync 实现以及平台需要变得更加用户友好表示担忧。一些评论强调了较长的集成时间和一些需要改进的可用性挑战。
对于平台的创新和持续更新,人们的评价褒贬不一。一些用户对平台频繁的改进和新功能表示赞赏,而另一些人则认为,某些方面(如 iHotelier CRS)需要进行更重大的... 对于平台的创新和持续更新,人们的评价褒贬不一。一些用户对平台频繁的改进和新功能表示赞赏,而另一些人则认为,某些方面(如 iHotelier CRS)需要进行更重大的更新,才能保持与时俱进和直观。
TravelClick 中的分析和报告工具因其跟踪绩效和做出明智决策的能力而受到酒店经营者的高度重视。用户强调详细的商业智能报告和市场情报功能是战略制定的关键组成... TravelClick 中的分析和报告工具因其跟踪绩效和做出明智决策的能力而受到酒店经营者的高度重视。用户强调详细的商业智能报告和市场情报功能是战略制定的关键组成部分。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 的客户支持普遍受到好评,因为它乐于助人、专业且高效。一些评论指出了支持团队的响应能力和乐于助人,但也提到了回复延迟和培训不足。评论还强调了... TravelClick 的客户支持普遍受到好评,因为它乐于助人、专业且高效。一些评论指出了支持团队的响应能力和乐于助人,但也提到了回复延迟和培训不足。评论还强调了在各个地区提供本地支持和更多培训选项的必要性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 和 GuestCentric CRS 共享许多核心 Hotel Reservations Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 提供 107 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 GuestCentric CRS 提供 45 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。GuestCentric CRS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS):否。GuestCentric CRS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Reservations Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 74,GuestCentric 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐