The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 76 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Amadeus 表现出色 在 集成和可用性 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Reporting Dashboard and Guest profiles.
GuestCentric 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 .
基于 HTR 上 76 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 53 | 23 |
在分析了 76 条经验证的评价后,Amadeus 用户最看重其 集成和可用性, 创新与更新, 分析和报告,而 GuestCentric 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
集成和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
创新与更新
▾
|
|
|
+
分析和报告
▾
|
|
|
+
收入和定价策略
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
客户支持
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店预订软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #8 7 条评价 | #3 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #5 24 条评价 | #7 5 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 10 条评价 | #9 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #4 3 条评价 | #6 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 18 条评价 | #4 11 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #6 17 条评价 | #7 8 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 16 条评价 | #7 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 5 条评价 | #3 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #5 13 条评价 | #15 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | #14 17 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #4 4 条评价 | #12 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | #3 4 条评价 | #10 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Amadeus iHotelier® CRS and GuestCentric CRS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, size, and regional focus. Both aim to streamline reservations and distribution, but they approach these goals differently. Amadeus offers a broad, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations and global reach, while GuestCentric emphasizes simplicity and direct bookings, especially for mid-sized hotels. Which product aligns best with your hotel’s operational priorities?
Amadeus iHotelier® is a comprehensive CRS designed for hotels seeking advanced distribution, booking management, and extensive integration capabilities. It caters to a diverse range of property types, including resorts, city center hotels, and branded chains, with a focus on maximizing revenue through sophisticated rate and inventory control. GuestCentric, however, targets hotels prioritizing ease of use and direct bookings, often appealing to boutique and independent properties that want a straightforward interface without sacrificing essential features. Do you need a full-featured enterprise solution, or a user-friendly platform that emphasizes direct reservations?
Amadeus’s large regional presence across 29 countries and over 100 verified integrations allows it to serve properties aiming for broad distribution and global reach. GuestCentric’s smaller footprint—operating mainly in three countries—may limit its international reach but offers a more simplified experience. If your hotel operates across multiple regions and relies on complex distribution channels, Amadeus is better suited. Conversely, if your focus is on local or regional direct bookings with fewer distribution channels, GuestCentric could be more appropriate. Are you looking for a highly scalable, global solution or a streamlined platform for local growth?
If your hotel needs advanced distribution, extensive integrations, and scalability, go with Amadeus. Its 18 unique features—including channel management, metasearch, and PMS connectivity—are ideal for larger hotels and chains seeking comprehensive control over revenue management and distribution. If your hotel prioritizes simplicity, ease of onboarding, and boosting direct reservations without the complexity of an enterprise system, GuestCentric is the better fit. Its intuitive interface and effective booking engine have earned high user ratings for ease of use and customer service.
For hotels with complex multi-property operations, Amadeus’s multi-property management and centralized user roles make it a clear choice. Smaller hotels or independents wanting a quick setup and straightforward reservation handling should lean toward GuestCentric. Does your property require deep integration and customization, or is a reliable, easy-to-manage system more important? The answer should guide your decision.
Amadeus’s ease of use scores 4.43/5, with many users noting that initial learning curves are steep but manageable with experience. Its onboarding rating of 4.1/5 suggests some training is necessary, and reviews mention that understanding the system’s full potential takes time. GuestCentric, on the other hand, scores slightly higher at 4.66/5 for ease of use, with users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward reservation process. Its onboarding rating of 4.57/5 indicates a smoother implementation experience.
Customer support ratings reflect this difference: Amadeus’s 4.15/5 support score is solid but shows room for improvement, especially in responsiveness. GuestCentric outperforms with a 4.76/5 support rating, with reviews highlighting their helpful, quick, and friendly service. If ease of use and rapid onboarding are your top priorities, Edge: GuestCentric.
Amadeus offers a rich feature set with 18 unique capabilities, including booking engine, channel management, metasearch connectivity, RMS, and detailed reporting dashboards. These features support larger, complex operations that require extensive customization and integration. GuestCentric, however, provides a streamlined booking engine and central reservation system with no exclusive features listed but excels in user-friendliness and direct booking optimization.
The depth of Amadeus’s features makes it ideal for hotels needing sophisticated revenue management and distribution tools. GuestCentric’s simplicity is advantageous for properties that want essential reservation functions without complexity. Given the feature count, Edge: Amadeus.
GuestCentric’s customer support scores 4.76/5, with reviews citing prompt, friendly, and effective assistance. Users appreciate the dedicated attention, especially during onboarding, which facilitates faster adoption. Amadeus’s support, rated at 4.15/5, is generally helpful but has some reviews mentioning delayed responses and a need for more localized support.
Hoteliers value quick resolution and proactive support, especially when integrating complex systems. With superior recent support ratings and more positive user feedback, Edge: GuestCentric.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified integrations, including numerous solutions in revenue management, marketing, and property systems. Shared partners like SiteMinder and Oracle Hospitality highlight its extensive ecosystem. GuestCentric has 44 verified partners, with shared integrations including WebRezPro and RoomKey PMS, but it covers fewer third-party solutions overall.
If your hotel relies on a broad array of technology partners, Amadeus offers more flexibility and options. For hotels with simpler tech stacks or those seeking fewer integrations, GuestCentric remains sufficient. Edge: Amadeus.
GuestCentric holds a higher overall rating at 4.75/5, compared to Amadeus’s 4.57/5. Review recency indicates more current positive feedback for GuestCentric, with newer reviews emphasizing ease of use and support. Larger hotel segments and boutique properties give GuestCentric higher ratings, especially for support and onboarding.
Amadeus, while highly rated among independent and branded hotels, has slightly lower scores, possibly due to complexity and onboarding challenges. For overall satisfaction, Edge: GuestCentric.
Pricing details for both products are not publicly disclosed, and both operate on custom pricing models based on property size and needs. Most users report that both platforms require direct quotes, with no free tiers or clear subscription plans available. Consider your budget and size when requesting proposals, as both systems are typically priced for mid to large-scale properties.
Amadeus iHotelier® is a versatile, feature-packed CRS suited for large, multi-property, or globally distributed hotels. Its extensive integrations and advanced tools make it ideal for businesses with complex revenue strategies and broad distribution needs, despite a steeper learning curve.
GuestCentric, in contrast, offers a simpler, more intuitive platform that excels in direct booking and ease of use, making it suitable for boutique and regional hotels. It supports hotels that prioritize quick onboarding, strong customer support, and straightforward operations without heavy reliance on broad integrations.
In summary, choose Amadeus if your hotel needs scale, advanced distribution, and comprehensive analytics. Opt for GuestCentric if your focus is on simplicity, direct reservations, and excellent customer service—especially if your property is smaller or regionally focused.
酒店预订软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 和 GuestCentric CRS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 元搜索连接 | ||
| 内容管理 | ||
| 呼叫中心功能 | ||
| 报告仪表板 | ||
| 渠道管理和OTA分销 | ||
| 预订引擎 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 6 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因与各种渠道、GDS 和 Opera 等 PMS 系统无缝集成而受到称赞。然而,人们对复杂的 OTA Sync 实现以及平台需要变得更加用户友好表示担忧。一些评论强... TravelClick 因与各种渠道、GDS 和 Opera 等 PMS 系统无缝集成而受到称赞。然而,人们对复杂的 OTA Sync 实现以及平台需要变得更加用户友好表示担忧。一些评论强调了较长的集成时间和一些需要改进的可用性挑战。
对于平台的创新和持续更新,人们的评价褒贬不一。一些用户对平台频繁的改进和新功能表示赞赏,而另一些人则认为,某些方面(如 iHotelier CRS)需要进行更重大的... 对于平台的创新和持续更新,人们的评价褒贬不一。一些用户对平台频繁的改进和新功能表示赞赏,而另一些人则认为,某些方面(如 iHotelier CRS)需要进行更重大的更新,才能保持与时俱进和直观。
TravelClick 中的分析和报告工具因其跟踪绩效和做出明智决策的能力而受到酒店经营者的高度重视。用户强调详细的商业智能报告和市场情报功能是战略制定的关键组成... TravelClick 中的分析和报告工具因其跟踪绩效和做出明智决策的能力而受到酒店经营者的高度重视。用户强调详细的商业智能报告和市场情报功能是战略制定的关键组成部分。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 的客户支持普遍受到好评,因为它乐于助人、专业且高效。一些评论指出了支持团队的响应能力和乐于助人,但也提到了回复延迟和培训不足。评论还强调了... TravelClick 的客户支持普遍受到好评,因为它乐于助人、专业且高效。一些评论指出了支持团队的响应能力和乐于助人,但也提到了回复延迟和培训不足。评论还强调了在各个地区提供本地支持和更多培训选项的必要性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 和 GuestCentric CRS 共享许多核心 Hotel Reservations Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 GuestCentric CRS 提供 44 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。GuestCentric CRS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS):否。GuestCentric CRS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Reservations Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 79,GuestCentric 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问