The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店预订软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #8 7 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #5 24 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 10 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #4 3 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 18 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #6 17 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 16 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #5 13 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #5 12 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #4 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #3 4 条评价 | — |
When selecting a hotel reservations software, your team needs a solution that streamlines distribution, maximizes revenue, and offers reliable support. Both Amadeus iHotelier® and Idiso CRS aim to fulfill these needs but approach them differently—Amadeus with its extensive feature set and global presence, Idiso with its straightforward, web-based approach. The choice hinges on whether you prioritize a feature-rich platform or a simpler, easier-to-use system tailored for quick deployment.
Amadeus holds a significant advantage with its broader market presence, a larger user base, and a higher review count, particularly in recent months. Idiso, while less established and with fewer reviews, might appeal for its simplicity and flexible web-based nature. The question is: which platform aligns better with your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions?
Amadeus iHotelier® is designed for hotels seeking a comprehensive, scalable CRS with extensive features such as booking engine, channel management, content and guest profile management, and advanced revenue tools. Its robust integrations—over 104 verified partners—make it suitable for larger, multi-property, or more complex operations aiming for broad distribution and sophisticated analytics.
Idiso CRS, on the other hand, offers a simplified, web-only platform emphasizing ease of use, real-time updates, and straightforward distribution. It appeals to smaller hotels or those new to CRS technology, especially if they prioritize quick setup and flexibility without the need for deep feature sets.
Amadeus’s large user base and recent positive reviews (52 reviews, with 1 in the last 6 months) suggest its platform is actively used and trusted. Idiso, with no recent reviews, lacks current user feedback, which could be a concern if ongoing support and updates matter to your team.
Would your hotel benefit from extensive features and proven global support, or is a leaner, easier-to-manage system more aligned with your current needs?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, scalable CRS capable of managing multiple properties, integrating with numerous channels, and providing detailed analytics, Amadeus is the clear choice. Its suite of 18 unique features includes a booking engine, channel management, metasearch connectivity, and RMS integration, making it suitable for mid-sized to large operations aiming for growth.
If your hotel prioritizes simplicity, quick deployment, and real-time inventory updates without deep customization, Idiso could be appealing. It’s a web-based, guided wizard platform designed for ease, with no installation required and a focus on straightforward distribution—ideal for small properties or startups.
Your decision should consider your hotel’s complexity, technical resources, and growth plans. For hotels that want a comprehensive, proven solution with extensive integrations, Amadeus is the better pick. For those seeking a simple, flexible system, Idiso might suffice.
Amadeus iHotelier® boasts a high ease of use score of 4.43 out of 5, supported by positive reviews praising its detailed training, user-friendly interface after initial learning, and comprehensive onboarding. Users appreciate its intuitive management of reservations and rates once the initial learning curve is overcome, though some find it initially complex.
Idiso, although not rated explicitly for ease of use, emphasizes guided wizards and ease of real-time updates, making it accessible for users without technical backgrounds. Its web-based, no-setup-required approach reduces onboarding time significantly.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus offers 18 unique features, including a booking engine, channel management, content management, geotargeted pricing, and RMS connectivity—all designed to support full-scale hotel operations. Its robust feature set is backed by a proven track record and extensive integration options.
Idiso provides no additional features beyond basic distribution and real-time inventory updates but excels in simplicity and ease of maintenance through guided wizards and web-based updates.
Given the extensive feature set, Amadeus clearly leads in capability. Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s support scores 4.15 out of 5, with reviews highlighting helpful, friendly support and detailed onboarding. Users mention that while initial training is strong, some wish for more ongoing training options, and that support responsiveness is generally good but could improve.
Idiso, with no recent reviews or explicit support ratings, leaves uncertainty about ongoing assistance. Its simplicity suggests fewer support needs, but the lack of recent feedback makes it difficult to assess.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus stands out with 104 verified partners, including major OTAs, GDS systems, PMS, and marketing platforms, making it highly flexible for larger, multi-channel operations. Shared integrations are minimal, but Amadeus’s extensive partner network ensures broad connectivity.
Idiso has no verified integrations available, indicating a more limited or less transparent integration ecosystem. This could be a drawback if your hotel relies on specific third-party systems.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s overall rating of 4.57/5 is based on 52 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its comprehensive features, ease of use after initial learning, and reliable support. Independent property reviews rate it highly at 4.85/5, suggesting strong satisfaction among diverse hotel types.
Idiso, lacking recent reviews or ratings, provides no recent data on user satisfaction. Its lower profile and absence of feedback make it difficult to determine user happiness definitively.
Edge: Amadeus.
Pricing for Amadeus iHotelier® is typically custom, with no public fees or freemium options; implementation and license costs are not disclosed publicly. It’s designed for larger hotels and chains willing to invest in a full-featured platform.
Idiso also does not publicly disclose pricing, but its web-based, no-install approach suggests a potentially lower entry cost suitable for small hotels or properties seeking quick deployment without large upfront fees.
Exact costs are unavailable, but Amadeus’s extensive features and support generally imply a higher investment.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with limited technical resources or budget constraints, or if you prefer a simplified, easy-to-deploy solution.
Not ideal if your hotel needs advanced analytics, multi-property management, or broad integrations.
Amadeus iHotelier® offers a full-scale, multi-feature platform suited for hotels aiming for growth and extensive distribution. Its large user base, recent reviews, and broad integrations make it a reliable choice for mid-sized and larger properties.
Idiso CRS provides a straightforward, web-based solution that appeals to small properties or those new to CRS technology. Its ease of use and real-time updates are beneficial, but the lack of recent reviews and features limits its appeal for larger or more complex operations.
If your hotel needs a proven, feature-rich system with global support, go with Amadeus. If simplicity and quick deployment are your priorities, Idiso could meet your current needs but may not scale well as your hotel grows.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因与各种渠道、GDS 和 Opera 等 PMS 系统无缝集成而受到称赞。然而,人们对复杂的 OTA Sync 实现以及平台需要变得更加用户友好表示担忧。一些评论强... TravelClick 因与各种渠道、GDS 和 Opera 等 PMS 系统无缝集成而受到称赞。然而,人们对复杂的 OTA Sync 实现以及平台需要变得更加用户友好表示担忧。一些评论强调了较长的集成时间和一些需要改进的可用性挑战。
对于平台的创新和持续更新,人们的评价褒贬不一。一些用户对平台频繁的改进和新功能表示赞赏,而另一些人则认为,某些方面(如 iHotelier CRS)需要进行更重大的... 对于平台的创新和持续更新,人们的评价褒贬不一。一些用户对平台频繁的改进和新功能表示赞赏,而另一些人则认为,某些方面(如 iHotelier CRS)需要进行更重大的更新,才能保持与时俱进和直观。
TravelClick 中的分析和报告工具因其跟踪绩效和做出明智决策的能力而受到酒店经营者的高度重视。用户强调详细的商业智能报告和市场情报功能是战略制定的关键组成... TravelClick 中的分析和报告工具因其跟踪绩效和做出明智决策的能力而受到酒店经营者的高度重视。用户强调详细的商业智能报告和市场情报功能是战略制定的关键组成部分。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 的客户支持普遍受到好评,因为它乐于助人、专业且高效。一些评论指出了支持团队的响应能力和乐于助人,但也提到了回复延迟和培训不足。评论还强调了... TravelClick 的客户支持普遍受到好评,因为它乐于助人、专业且高效。一些评论指出了支持团队的响应能力和乐于助人,但也提到了回复延迟和培训不足。评论还强调了在各个地区提供本地支持和更多培训选项的必要性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 和 Idiso CRS 共享许多核心 Hotel Reservations Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Idiso CRS 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.4/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS):否。Idiso CRS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Reservations Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 79,Idiso 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问