The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #26 28 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | — | #46 4 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #32 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #31 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #31 16 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | — | #44 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #43 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #32 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #25 8 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #20 25 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #16 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #11 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can transform your hotel’s operations, guest experience, and revenue. Both AmicHotel and Counter aim to streamline your workflows, but they serve very different segments and needs. AmicHotel promises a broad, all-in-one solution with an emphasis on larger hotels, while Counter is designed specifically for hostels with a focus on ease of use and affordability.
Your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and tech needs will determine which platform better suits you. Are you prioritizing a robust, feature-rich system or a simple, mobile-friendly interface? Let’s break down how these two compare across key areas.
AmicHotel and Counter both aim to manage reservations, check-ins, billing, and guest data. However, AmicHotel’s comprehensive platform offers numerous features but lacks recent reviews and a strong user base, raising questions about its current usability and support.
Counter, on the other hand, boasts over 54 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, support responsiveness, and mobile functionality. While Counter is primarily for hostels and small properties, its active community and ongoing improvements make it a compelling choice for budget-conscious hosts.
Given the limited recent data on AmicHotel, Counter’s proven track record and recent positive reviews make it the stronger option today. Are you ready to dive into which platform matches your hotel’s needs precisely?
If your hotel is a small property, hostel, or operates on a tight budget, counter’s free, user-friendly platform is likely your best bet. Its intuitive interface and mobile access make managing bookings and guest interactions straightforward, especially if your team needs quick onboarding.
If your hotel requires a more extensive system with features like advanced housekeeping, revenue management, and multi-channel integrations, AmicHotel’s larger scope might seem appealing. However, the lack of recent reviews and limited support data make Counter the safer, more tested choice for most small to medium hotels today.
In summary, choose Counter if your focus is simplicity and affordability; opt for AmicHotel if you need a highly customizable system, and are prepared to evaluate its performance over time.
Counter scores a 4.6/5 for ease of use, with reviewers citing its clean, intuitive interface that allows staff to train quickly. Many mention managing bookings via mobile browser on the go, which enhances daily operational flexibility.
AmicHotel, on the other hand, has no user ratings available, and there is no recent feedback on onboarding or UI. Its lack of recent reviews suggests it might not be as user-friendly or well-supported currently.
Edge: Counter.
Counter offers a comprehensive list of 19 features exclusive to its platform, including channel management, payment processing, booking engine, housekeeper module, group bookings, multi-currency, and guest CRM. These features directly support hostel operations, multi-platform connectivity, and revenue tracking.
AmicHotel provides no listed features, and its overall offering appears limited. Its AI-driven summaries and reservation tools are mentioned, but without specific features, it’s hard to compare.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support scores an impressive 4.96/5, with reviewers highlighting fast, helpful, and responsive service. Testimonials mention “Evelyn and Max” as support stars, often responding in minutes and resolving issues efficiently.
AmicHotel’s support data is unavailable, and the absence of recent reviews makes it difficult to assess. The lack of recent user feedback suggests support quality may be uncertain.
Edge: Counter.
Counter has 7 verified integrations, including Stripe, Goki, Cloudbeds, and SiteMinder, covering payment, channel management, and property services. These integrations facilitate smooth operations across multiple platforms.
AmicHotel does not list any verified integrations, which could limit its ability to connect with other tools your hotel may already use.
Edge: Counter.
Counter’s average rating of 4.73/5 from 54 reviews indicates strong user satisfaction, especially among hostel operators. Recent reviews praise its ease of use, automation, and support.
AmicHotel, with no reviews, has no rating data. This absence suggests it is either not actively used or not yet proven in the current market climate.
Edge: Counter.
Both products currently do not list specific pricing details. Counter’s free version and numerous features suggest it is highly cost-effective, especially for small properties.
AmicHotel’s lack of publicly available pricing indicates it may be a custom or enterprise solution, likely more expensive and aimed at larger hotels.
Not ideal if your property is small, budget-conscious, or prefers a simple interface; limited recent support data is a concern.
Not ideal if your property demands advanced revenue management, extensive integrations, or complex group booking features.
Counter is an established, well-reviewed PMS tailored for hostels and small properties. Its recent reviews and active community make it reliable for daily operations and guest management, even if it has some bugs that users report are being addressed.
AmicHotel promises a broad feature set and AI capabilities, but the lack of recent reviews and support data suggests it’s less ready for current hotel needs. Its target seems to be larger, more complex properties, but without recent validation, it’s a riskier choice.
If your hotel values proven usability, support, and active development, Counter is the clear recommendation. For larger hotels with complex needs willing to invest in a bespoke solution, AmicHotel might become relevant, but further vetting is essential.
Note: The detailed review counts, recentness, and user feedback heavily favor Counter, making it the more dependable choice for most hoteliers today.
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。AmicHotel 和 Counter 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。AmicHotel 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Counter 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
AmicHotel:否。Counter:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。AmicHotel 的 HT Score 为 0,Counter 的为 17。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问