The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 887 条经验证的评价后,AmicHotel 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #28 8 条评价 |
Choosing between AmicHotel by AmicHotel and Mews PMS by Mews is a decision rooted in your hotel’s operational needs, scale, and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but their capabilities, scale, and user feedback differ significantly. AmicHotel offers a basic solution with limited reviews and no recent data, whereas Mews dominates with extensive, recent feedback and a broad feature set.
Your team needs to assess if a simple, possibly regional tool suffices or if a robust, scalable platform is necessary. Are you ready to prioritize a mature, highly-rated system that supports growth and innovation? Or are you comfortable with a minimal solution that lacks recent validation?
AmicHotel and Mews both address core property management challenges like reservations, billing, and housekeeping. However, AmicHotel’s review count is zero, and its ratings are nonexistent, providing no recent customer insights or validation.
In contrast, Mews has over 750 reviews, with 98 in the last six months, underpinning its strong reputation. Mews’s 4.62/5 overall rating, ease of use, and 93% likelihood to recommend make it the clear industry favorite. Do you want to rely on a system with no recent data or one consistently rated highly by modern hoteliers?
If your hotel needs a proven, feature-rich platform capable of supporting multi-property management, dynamic revenue strategies, and extensive integrations, Mews is the obvious choice. Its 336 verified partners and 54 regional coverage demonstrate its scalability.
If your hotel is small, regional, or only needs basic reservation management without support for multiple locations or integrations, AmicHotel might suffice—though it offers no features or verified partners. Given the data, Mews’s extensive features, support, and recent reviews make it the safer and more strategic investment for growth-oriented hotels.
AmicHotel scores a 0/5 for ease of use, with no recent reviews to gauge its UI or onboarding. Its lack of recent validation suggests limited usability support and potential complexity or poor adoption.
Mews, on the other hand, boasts a 4.7/5 rating for ease of use, backed by 98 recent reviews praising its modern, intuitive interface and smooth onboarding process. Multiple reviewers mention how quickly they adopted the platform and how it simplifies daily tasks. Edge: Mews.
AmicHotel provides zero unique features, indicating it is likely a basic or incomplete PMS. It offers no additional modules or integrations, limiting its functionality.
Mews offers 59 features, including multi-lingual/multi-currency support, a revenue management module, guest CRM, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, automated night audit, mobile app, guest messaging, digital registration, and extensive reporting tools. Its marketplace provides over 1,000 integrations, vastly surpassing AmicHotel’s capabilities. Edge: Mews.
AmicHotel’s customer support is unverified—no recent reviews or ratings exist to gauge assistance quality.
Mews’s customer support scores a 4.27/5, with reviews highlighting responsive, helpful support teams and well-structured onboarding. Many praise Mews for prompt bug resolution and proactive communication, essential for operational stability. Edge: Mews.
AmicHotel has no verified partners, severely limiting its ability to connect with other tools or systems.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including shared partners like Sage and Hotel Investor Apps, plus many unique ones such as Criton, Right Revenue, FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access, and more. This extensive ecosystem allows tailored tech stacks and operational flexibility. Edge: Mews.
AmicHotel’s ratings are absent, offering no basis for user satisfaction evaluation.
Mews enjoys a 4.62/5 score, with extensive recent positive reviews across a variety of hotel types—from boutique to large chains. Hotels like Episode Tbilisi and Cresta Palace highlight Mews’s connectivity, ease of use, and revenue impact, with many reviewers emphasizing its role in operational efficiency. Edge: Mews.
AmicHotel provides no pricing information, suggesting it may be free, limited, or incomplete.
Mews’s base price is $900/month, with no free tier or trial, but many users feel this cost yields significant value considering its features, support, and scale. Its pricing reflects its enterprise-ready capabilities, especially for multi-property management and integrations.
Mews is a comprehensive, highly-rated platform suited for hotels aiming to grow, innovate, and deliver superior guest experiences. Its 98 recent reviews and 4.62/5 rating attest to its reliability and user satisfaction.
If your hotel needs a proven, scalable PMS with extensive features, integrations, and ongoing support, choosing Mews is a clear decision. For very small, regional operations with minimal tech requirements, AmicHotel might suffice temporarily, but it offers no recent validation or advanced functionality.
In summary, Mews is the better choice for ambitious hotels ready to embrace modern hospitality technology. AmicHotel’s limited scope and lack of recent reviews make it a risky, short-term solution at best.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。AmicHotel 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。AmicHotel 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 336 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
AmicHotel:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。AmicHotel 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 99。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问