The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 169 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Ankerdata Hsopitality 表现出色 .
Mews 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment Log Reports and Mobile Ordering.
基于 HTR 上 169 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 169 |
在分析了 169 条经验证的评价后,Ankerdata Hsopitality 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 用户界面和报表, integration with third-party systems, seamless pms integration。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Ankerdata Hsopitality |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和报表
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with Third-Party Systems
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Product Development and Feature Evolution
▾
|
|
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
|
−
操作改进
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店POS系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Ankerdata Hsopitality |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 44 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 94 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 9 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Ankerdata Hsopitality |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #3 74 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #3 41 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 31 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #2 12 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Ankerdata Hsopitality |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #3 14 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #2 130 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #5 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #6 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right POS system for your hotel can significantly impact operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Both Ankerdata POS and Mews POS aim to streamline transactions and integrate with hotel systems, but their approach, features, and market presence differ markedly. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and specific needs—yet, with the available data, one product clearly stands out.
Ankerdata POS has zero reviews across all key metrics, which severely limits confidence in its performance and support. Conversely, Mews POS boasts over 150 reviews, a recent surge (66 reviews in the last six months), and a high 9.32/5 NPS score, making it the more reliable choice for hoteliers.
Are you looking for a POS that’s proven, well-supported, and widely adopted? Or are you considering a less established option with limited feedback? The data points toward Mews being the stronger contender.
Both products aim to serve hotel operations, but their market presence and maturity differ. Ankerdata POS is a hospitality-specific POS solution that promotes transaction management and sales tracking but provides no reviews or detailed features, signaling a lack of proven user experience and ongoing support. Mews POS, on the other hand, is a purpose-built hotel POS with extensive integrations, real-time reporting, and broad adoption across different hotel segments, backed by more recent reviews and high hotel satisfaction.
This contrast indicates Mews’s stability and reliability far surpass Ankerdata’s unverified offering. Are you comfortable choosing a product without the backing of user feedback and proven support? Or do you prefer a product with a strong track record?
Given the current evidence, Mews’s tangible presence and positive reviews make it the more trustworthy choice for most hotels.
If your hotel needs a reliable, integrated POS solution with extensive third-party support, go with Mews. Its 336 verified integrations and demonstrated success in diverse hotel segments make it suitable for properties looking for comprehensive operational automation and detailed analytics.
If your hotel operates at a very small scale, prioritizes a simple transaction system, and is willing to risk unverified performance, Ankerdata might seem appealing—but the lack of reviews makes this a gamble. For most hotels seeking stability and proven performance, Mews is the clear winner.
In summary, choose Mews if you want a mature, well-supported platform with proven results. Ankerdata remains untested and unsupported by user feedback, making it a risky choice for most.
Ease of use heavily favors Mews, which has a 4.74/5 user rating and over 150 recent reviews highlighting its intuitive, modern interface and straightforward onboarding process. Reviewers frequently mention how quickly staff learn the system and how seamlessly it integrates into daily operations.
Ankerdata, with a 0/5 score and no reviews, provides no user feedback or data on usability, making it impossible to assess. Without tangible evidence, you risk deploying a system that may not be user-friendly or well-supported.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a suite of 29 features, including PCI compliance, discounts & promotions, upselling, digital menus, mobile ordering, inventory and ingredient management, rewards programs, and extensive reporting tools. These features directly support hotel restaurants, F&B automation, and operational insights.
Ankerdata provides no documented features, which raises concern about its functionality and scope. Without any feature set or user reviews, it’s impossible to verify whether it meets modern hotel needs.
Edge: Mews.
Mews scores a 4.43/5 in customer support, with reviews praising its reliable, solution-oriented team and well-structured onboarding. Recent feedback indicates prompt responses and helpful guidance, especially during the critical initial setup phase.
Ankerdata offers no support ratings or reviews, leaving hotel teams with no assurance of support quality. Relying on an unsupported or unverified vendor is inherently risky, especially for mission-critical systems.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s marketplace features 336 verified integrations, including popular tools like Criton, Right Revenue, Sage, and multiple payment and marketing platforms. This extensive ecosystem simplifies connecting your existing systems and enhances overall operational flexibility.
Ankerdata, with zero verified integrations, provides no evidence of compatibility or expandability. This limits your hotel’s ability to customize or scale your POS as your technology stack evolves.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s reviews are recent and plentiful, with a high 9.32/5 NPS score and 95% likelihood to recommend, indicating strong user satisfaction. Hotels across segments—luxury, boutique, city center, and hostels—appreciate its ease of use, support, and feature richness.
Ankerdata’s lack of reviews means no ratings or feedback are available, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or performance.
Edge: Mews.
Ankerdata has no publicly available pricing information, and it does not offer a trial, which complicates budget planning. Mews charges a base price of $200/month, with no free tier or trial, providing a clear, predictable cost structure.
Given Mews’s transparent pricing and proven value, your hotel can better evaluate ROI and plan budgets confidently. The absence of pricing from Ankerdata diminishes its attractiveness as a tested solution.
Mews is a well-established, feature-rich hotel POS with extensive integrations, strong support, and a proven track record backed by recent reviews. It’s suited for hotels of all sizes looking for automation, guest experience enhancement, and operational insights.
Ankerdata offers no user feedback or documented features, making it a risky, unverified option. If stability, support, and proven performance matter—and they should—Mews is the clear choice.
In summary, for most hotels, Mews provides the security of a tested, supported, and highly rated system. Ankerdata’s lack of reviews and features makes it a gamble that few hotels can afford in today’s competitive landscape.
酒店POS系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Ankerdata Hsopitality |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Ankerdata POS 和 Mews POS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Ankerdata Hsopitality |
|
|---|---|---|
| 付款日志报告 | ||
| 折扣和促销 | ||
| 支票拆分 | ||
| 数字菜单 | ||
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 追加销售 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 17 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We’ve been with Mews for a few years now and it helped to transform the way we operate. It’s very intuitive to work with and saves our team so much time."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In an industry where human contact is more important than digital contact, having a platform like Mews that not only reduces time at a screen but also gives us more face time with..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Self-check-in kiosks are integral to LyLo's DNA. Coupled with Mews capabilities like guest messaging and online check-out, they form the essence of our guest experience. In fact, t..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Mews 的界面被描述为现代且直观,便于用户流畅操作。然而,一些评论指出,其报告工具在复杂性和灵活性方面仍有改进空间,尤其是在多物业设置和详细的运营洞察方... Mews 的界面被描述为现代且直观,便于用户流畅操作。然而,一些评论指出,其报告工具在复杂性和灵活性方面仍有改进空间,尤其是在多物业设置和详细的运营洞察方面。
Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centraliz... Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centralized operations, real-time booking management, and accurate financial reporting, although occasional synchronization issues are noted.
Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data... Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data. This integration is praised for improving billing accuracy, reducing departmental friction, and enhancing guest service experience by personalizing interactions.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a... Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a need for more polished features and quicker implementation of user suggestions.
该平台因其丰富的自定义选项而备受赞誉,用户可以通过定制工作流程和提醒来提升宾客体验。然而,用户也表示需要更直观的自定义功能,以满足特定的运营需求和宾客... 该平台因其丰富的自定义选项而备受赞誉,用户可以通过定制工作流程和提醒来提升宾客体验。然而,用户也表示需要更直观的自定义功能,以满足特定的运营需求和宾客互动。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Ankerdata POS 和 Mews POS 共享许多核心 Hotel POS Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Ankerdata POS 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews POS 提供 335 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews POS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Ankerdata POS:否。Mews POS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel POS Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Ankerdata Hsopitality 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问