The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 27 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc).
siesta solutions 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 27 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $300/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 27 | 0 |
在分析了 27 条经验证的评价后,Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 用户最看重其 易于使用且界面直观, 预订和前台管理, 产品稳定性和可靠性,而 siesta solutions 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
siesta solutions |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用且界面直观
▾
|
|
|
+
预订和前台管理
▾
|
|
|
+
产品稳定性和可靠性
▾
|
|
|
+
详细全面的报告
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
技术支持质量
▾
|
|
|
−
与第三方平台集成
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
siesta solutions |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #74 0 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #74 0 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #19 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
siesta solutions |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 | #72 1 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #51 2 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #67 0 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #48 1 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
siesta solutions |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #44 0 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #27 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Anand Systems Inc.'s ASI PMS and Siesta extranet hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs. ASI PMS, with a proven track record and 26 recent reviews, offers a comprehensive property management solution, while Siesta extranet remains largely unreviewed and untested in recent user feedback. Your decision should be based on which product aligns better with your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth ambitions.
Both systems aim to streamline hotel operations, but they diverge significantly in maturity, feature set, and market presence. ASI’s extensive feature list and ongoing user satisfaction make it a more reliable choice for most hotels today. But are you ready to prioritize a mature, well-supported platform over a less proven alternative?
ASI PMS is a fully developed, cloud-based property management system with over 26 reviews in the last six months, all indicating high satisfaction. Its core strengths include ease of use, detailed reporting, and a broad set of integrations, making it suitable for properties that want a scalable, feature-rich platform. Conversely, Siesta extranet has no recent reviews or ratings, indicating a lack of recent user experience data, which poses a risk if you need current insights.
ASI’s user reviews consistently praise its intuitive interface, real-time updates, and excellent support, while Siesta’s absence of reviews suggests it may not be actively supported or widely adopted. Do you prefer a product with proven performance and continuous user feedback, or are you comfortable experimenting with an unreviewed platform?
If your hotel needs a mature property management system with extensive features like multi-lingual support, integrated CRM, channel management, booking engine, and advanced reporting, go with ASI PMS. Its proven reliability and recent positive reviews make it ideal for mid-sized to large hotels seeking a comprehensive solution. If, however, your priority is a simple, straightforward booking and management platform with minimal complexity, Siesta extranet might appeal, though its lack of recent reviews is a concern.
For hotels planning to scale or requiring integrations with multiple third-party platforms, ASI’s 18 verified partners and ongoing support make it the safer, more adaptable choice. Conversely, Siesta’s limited market presence and unknown feature set suggest it’s better suited for very small or experimental hospitality setups that don’t need advanced features.
Based on current ratings, ASI PMS earns a 4.88/5 ease of use score from users who find it intuitive, straightforward, and easy to teach to new staff. Its onboarding process is rated 4.69/5, indicating a smooth setup experience. In contrast, Siesta extranet has no available user feedback or ratings, leaving its ease of use uncertain.
Recent reviews of ASI highlight its user-friendly front desk functions, check-in/out processes, and remote access, which are praised by users for reducing training time and operational errors. Siesta’s lack of recent reviews makes it impossible to assess its usability, but generally, less-established platforms tend to have steeper learning curves. Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI offers a robust suite of 47 features, including multi-lingual support, online check-in, guest CRM, channel management, booking engine, automated space optimization, digital registration, and integrated payment processing. These features cater to hotels seeking an all-in-one platform capable of supporting large-scale operations. Siesta extranet, with no detailed feature data available, cannot match this breadth.
The extensive feature set of ASI positions it as a more complete solution for hotels that want to centralize operations and streamline workflows. Siesta’s minimal data and lack of detailed features suggest it might have basic booking and management functionalities but unlikely to meet the needs of complex or growing hotels. Edge: ASI PMS.
Users rate ASI support highly, with a 4.73/5 score, emphasizing promptness, professionalism, and helpfulness. Many reviews mention technical support resolving issues quickly and staff being courteous. Since Siesta extranet has no recent reviews or ratings, its customer support quality remains unverified, posing a risk for hotels needing reliable assistance.
In today’s hotel operations, responsive support can prevent costly disruptions. ASI’s long-standing reputation and recent positive feedback make it the safer pick for ongoing operational peace of mind. Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI PMS is integrated with 18 verified partners, including major platforms like SiteMinder, Cendyn, Duetto, and SHR Group. These integrations enable seamless connections with OTAs, payment gateways, and revenue management tools. Siesta extranet, with zero verified integrations, offers limited connectivity options.
If your hotel relies on third-party systems to optimize distribution, billing, or revenue management, ASI’s extensive integration network is a significant advantage. Siesta’s lack of integrations limits its utility for hotels aiming to automate and connect various operational components. Edge: ASI PMS.
With 26 recent reviews, ASI PMS boasts a high average NPS score of 9.69/10 and a 97% likelihood to recommend. Users across segments praise its ease of use, support, and feature set. Siesta extranet has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction or hotel preferences.
Given the volume and recency of feedback, ASI’s standing as a highly-rated platform is clear. Its consistent positive reviews confirm its value for hotels seeking a reliable, well-supported PMS solution. Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI PMS has a transparent pricing model, with a base price of $300 per month. No trial, freemium, or additional fees are mentioned, providing clarity for budgeting. Siesta extranet’s pricing details are unavailable, which complicates cost comparison and planning.
For hotels that prioritize predictable costs and clear value, ASI’s transparent fee structure is advantageous. The lack of pricing details for Siesta extranet suggests it may be less flexible or less established. Edge: ASI PMS.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
ASI PMS offers a complete, reliable, and highly-rated property management system with extensive features, integrations, and support, making it suitable for most hotels seeking growth and operational efficiency. Its recent reviews and high satisfaction scores underscore its position as the more mature and proven solution.
Choose ASI PMS if your hotel values a robust, scalable platform that can handle complex operations and integrations, especially if you plan to expand or require detailed reporting. Its high user satisfaction and comprehensive feature set make it the safest investment today.
Siesta extranet, with no recent reviews or feature transparency, remains an uncertain choice. It might suit very small, straightforward properties or hotels experimenting with their management tools, but it lacks the proven stability and integration capabilities of ASI.
In conclusion, for hotels seeking a dependable, feature-rich, and well-supported PMS, ASI is the clear leader. Only consider Siesta if your needs are minimal, and you’re willing to accept the high risk and unknowns associated with an unreviewed platform.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
siesta solutions | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,ASI PMS 和 Siesta extranet 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
siesta solutions |
|---|---|---|
| 在前提 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 35 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户一致称赞ASI拥有友好直观的界面,能够简化预订管理流程,简化日常操作。对于没有酒店行业经验的用户来说,它尤其方便易用。
ASI 系统在管理前台任务和预订方面表现出色,提供各种工具来提高入住/退房流程和房间分配的效率。
ASI系统以其稳健可靠的性能而备受赞誉,确保了持续稳定的运行。尤其在运行需求较高的环境中,该系统更显优势。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
ASI的技术支持因其响应迅速、解决问题高效而广受好评,尽管也有部分用户反映响应时间有所延迟。培训方面的专业性和乐于助人也备受赞誉。
反复出现的批评意见强调了与第三方平台(特别是会计和库存管理平台)更好地集成能力的必要性,这可以简化更广泛的业务流程。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ASI PMS 和 Siesta extranet 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。ASI PMS 提供 18 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Siesta extranet 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ASI PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ASI PMS:否。Siesta extranet:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 的 HT Score 为 77,siesta solutions 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案