The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 913 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise.
Mews 表现出色 在 customization and flexibility 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
基于 HTR 上 913 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $300/mo | From $900/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 27 | 886 |
在分析了 913 条经验证的评价后,Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 用户最看重其 易于使用且界面直观, 预订和前台管理, 产品稳定性和可靠性,而 Mews 用户则强调 customization and flexibility, automation and efficiency, 入职和支持体验。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用且界面直观
▾
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
+
预订和前台管理
▾
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
+
产品稳定性和可靠性
▾
|
+
入职和支持体验
▾
|
|
+
详细全面的报告
▾
|
+
Reservation and Front Desk Automation
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
技术支持质量
▾
|
−
计费复杂性和报告局限性
▾
|
|
−
与第三方平台集成
▾
|
−
收益管理
▾
|
|
−
定价和费用
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #74 0 条评价 | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #74 0 条评价 | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #19 2 条评价 | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #72 1 条评价 | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #51 2 条评价 | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #67 0 条评价 | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #48 1 条评价 | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #44 0 条评价 | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #27 1 条评价 | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #28 8 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can define your hotel's operational success and guest satisfaction. Both ASI PMS by Anand Systems Inc. and Mews PMS aim to streamline hotel operations, but they cater to different hotel sizes, segments, and operational needs. How do they compare in user experience, features, support, and overall value? Let’s find out.
Both ASI and Mews are designed to help hotels manage reservations, billing, and front desk tasks efficiently. However, ASI’s longstanding presence and focus on small to mid-sized hotels make it a stable choice, while Mews’ modern, cloud-native platform offers a broader range of advanced features and integrations for a more scalable operation. Would you prefer a system rooted in traditional stability or one built for future growth?
If your hotel needs a scalable, tech-forward platform with over 336 integrations, extensive automation, and a proven track record among boutique and independent hotels, Mews is your best pick. Conversely, if you prioritize a straightforward, on-premise system with a simpler interface and fewer features, ASI could be suitable—though it has a significantly lower review count and more dated support ratings. Do you value advanced automation and a large ecosystem, or simplicity and familiarity?
ASI’s ease of use is highly rated at 4.88/5, with users describing it as straightforward and simple to teach, especially for daily operations. Mews also boasts a modern, intuitive interface rated at 4.7/5, with many reviews highlighting its ease of onboarding and remote access. However, Mews’ newer platform and extensive training resources give it a slight edge for staff adoption, especially in multi-property environments.
Edge: Mews PMS.
ASI offers 46 shared features and 1 unique feature: on-premise deployment, appealing to hotels seeking a traditional setup. Mews provides 46 shared features plus 13 unique capabilities, including multi-lingual support, guest CRM, online checkout, GDPR and SOC2 compliance, and a guest app—features that modern hotels increasingly rely on. For a hotel seeking comprehensive automation and guest engagement, Mews clearly leads on features.
Edge: Mews PMS.
ASI’s support ratings are strong at 4.73/5, with users appreciating quick technical resolutions and courteous staff, though some mention delays. Mews support scores slightly lower at 4.27/5, but reviews note ongoing improvements and responsive team efforts despite occasional bugs. Given the more recent review activity and a larger customer base, Mews support has become more visible and responsive, especially for tech integration issues.
Edge: ASI PMS (slightly, based on review volume and recent support ratings).
Mews offers a significantly larger ecosystem with 336 verified partners, including over 1,000 integrations via the Marketplace, covering everything from channel managers to revenue management tools. ASI’s 18 verified partners include some familiar names, but their integration count is limited, especially for multi-property hotel groups. For extensive third-party connectivity, Mews is the clear leader.
Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews overwhelmingly outperforms ASI in ratings: 4.62/5 overall versus ASI’s 0/5. Hoteliers across various segments, especially boutique, independent, and city-center hotels, rate Mews highly—many reviews praise its modern design, automation, and scalability. ASI’s reviews are limited, and its overall rating reflects less recent user satisfaction.
Edge: Mews PMS.
ASI’s base price is $300 monthly without additional fees, making it more affordable but potentially less feature-rich. Mews charges $900 monthly, reflecting its extensive integrations and modern platform, though no free trial info is available. For hotels seeking advanced capabilities and future-proofing, Mews’ higher price aligns with its broader feature set; smaller hotels with tight budgets might lean toward ASI.
ASI PMS offers a reliable, budget-friendly solution rooted in traditional hospitality management. Its limited feature set and lower review activity make it less suitable for hotels aiming to innovate and scale.
Mews, by contrast, delivers a modern, highly rated platform with over 336 integrations, advanced automation, and a focus on guest experiences. Its robust ecosystem and recent review volume reinforce its position as the industry’s leading choice.
If your hotel prioritizes scalability, automation, and modern guest engagement, Mews is the clear winner. However, for very small hotels or those with strict on-premise requirements, ASI might suffice—though it’s important to consider its lower support ratings and limited recent user feedback.
In conclusion, Mews’ larger ecosystem, recent reviews, and comprehensive features make it the better choice for most hotels ready to grow and innovate. If you want a system built for the future of hospitality, Mews is the way to go.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $900/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,ASI PMS 和 Mews PMS 共享 46 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 集中消息传递 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 2 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 9 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户一致称赞ASI拥有友好直观的界面,能够简化预订管理流程,简化日常操作。对于没有酒店行业经验的用户来说,它尤其方便易用。
ASI 系统在管理前台任务和预订方面表现出色,提供各种工具来提高入住/退房流程和房间分配的效率。
ASI系统以其稳健可靠的性能而备受赞誉,确保了持续稳定的运行。尤其在运行需求较高的环境中,该系统更显优势。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
ASI的技术支持因其响应迅速、解决问题高效而广受好评,尽管也有部分用户反映响应时间有所延迟。培训方面的专业性和乐于助人也备受赞誉。
反复出现的批评意见强调了与第三方平台(特别是会计和库存管理平台)更好地集成能力的必要性,这可以简化更广泛的业务流程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that... Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that more advanced configuration options, particularly in report generation and billing, could enhance the platform’s utility further.
The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on deliverin... The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on delivering a superior guest experience. However, some reviews mention that while automation works well, the billing process can sometimes be complex.
Mews 的用户引导体验并不稳定,一些用户称赞其亲力亲为的指导方式,而另一些用户则反映初始设置效率低下。随着时间的推移,支持团队的响应速度有所提升,提高了... Mews 的用户引导体验并不稳定,一些用户称赞其亲力亲为的指导方式,而另一些用户则反映初始设置效率低下。随着时间的推移,支持团队的响应速度有所提升,提高了问题解决率和用户满意度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 Mews 可以自动计费,但用户反映其复杂性以及报告和分析方面的局限性造成了困扰。改进这些方面可以为管理财务运营的用户提供更深入的洞察和更大的灵活性。
Mews 凭借其集成功能为收益管理提供了强大的基础,但用户指出,动态定价工具和高级分析方面还有改进的空间,尤其是在多物业运营方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ASI PMS 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。ASI PMS 提供 18 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 336 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ASI PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ASI PMS:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 的 HT Score 为 77,Mews 的为 99。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问