The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 265 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Social Media Integration/Bookings and Gift Vouchers.
innRoad 表现出色 在 客户支持质量 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Native Email Marketing.
基于 HTR 上 265 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 21 | 244 |
在分析了 265 条经验证的评价后,Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 用户最看重其 ,而 innRoad 用户则强调 客户支持质量, 定制和灵活性, 预订仪表板和报告。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持质量
▾
|
|
|
+
定制和灵活性
▾
|
|
|
+
预订仪表板和报告
▾
|
|
|
+
胶带图表和颜色编码
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
费率和付款管理
▾
|
|
|
−
用户界面故障
▾
|
|
|
−
移动可访问性和应用程序功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #38 2 条评价 | #4 150 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #37 3 条评价 | #13 41 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #15 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #23 1 条评价 | #16 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #45 1 条评价 | #9 86 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #46 1 条评价 | #13 37 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #39 2 条评价 | #12 33 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #36 1 条评价 | #7 18 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 4 条评价 | #1 229 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #29 6 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #26 1 条评价 | #26 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #25 0 条评价 |
Choosing between ASI WebRes by Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) and innRoad Booking Engine hinges on your hotel’s priorities. Both platforms aim to boost reservations and streamline operations but differ significantly in scope, user experience, and market presence. Your decision should align with whether you need a comprehensive property management system or a dedicated booking engine.
While ASI WebRes offers a deeply integrated hotel management suite, innRoad specializes in high-converting online bookings. Which features will better serve your property’s growth and operational needs?
Both ASI and innRoad target increasing your direct bookings, yet they approach it differently. ASI WebRes is part of a broader property management platform, focusing on the full operational cycle, from reservations to billing, with over 20 years of industry experience. innRoad, on the other hand, emphasizes its user-friendly, mobile-optimized booking engine designed to maximize online conversions and guest satisfaction.
The key divergence is the scope: ASI offers a full PMS with booking capabilities included, whereas innRoad concentrates solely on the booking engine, which can be integrated into existing systems or used standalone.
Additionally, innRoad has more recent reviews and a larger review count, indicating a more active user base and ongoing updates. Given this, innRoad’s recent performance and user feedback make it the stronger choice for hoteliers prioritizing recent support and feature updates. Are you looking for a full hotel management solution or just the best online booking platform?
If your hotel needs an all-in-one property management system with integrated booking, front desk, housekeeping, and channel management, ASI WebRes is the clear pick. Its 20+ years of industry presence and 20 recent reviews with high ratings demonstrate stability and ongoing support, especially for independent hotels or multi-property portfolios.
Conversely, if your primary goal is to increase online reservations, improve guest booking experiences, and you prefer a system with a proven conversion rate boost, innRoad’s dedicated booking engine is the superior option. Its more extensive feature set of 29 unique tools and 200 reviews—most recent—indicate it actively evolves to meet market demands.
If you’re seeking a comprehensive management platform, go with ASI; if boosting direct online bookings is your focus, choose innRoad.
Ease of use is critical for staff adoption and daily operations. ASI WebRes boasts a 4.95/5 rating for ease of use from 20 reviews, with many praising its intuitive dashboard and quick learning curve. Support and onboarding are highly rated at 4.8/5, with users citing straightforward workflows and responsive technical support.
innRoad scores slightly lower at 4.44/5 for ease of use, with some users reporting slow loading times and system glitches that impact daily operations. Its interface is praised for being mobile-friendly, but recent reviews mention interface stability as a concern.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
innRoad offers a broader array of features—29 unique tools—compared to ASI’s 2 exclusive features like social media integration and gift vouchers. innRoad’s feature set includes multi-currency, multi-lingual support, channel manager, online support, guest communication via SMS, booking engine, and more, addressing comprehensive operational needs.
ASI’s offerings are centered around reservation management, billing, and reporting, with key features like integrated channel management and customizable rates but fewer add-on functionalities.
Edge: innRoad.
Customer support quality significantly affects your operational stability. ASI has an average customer support rating of 4.85/5 from 20 reviews, with many users emphasizing rapid response times and knowledgeable staff—“Technical issues are resolved promptly. Excellent system,” says one user.
innRoad’s support scores 4.44/5 from 200 reviews, with some recent complaints about slow responses and system glitches. While many praise their helpfulness, others experience frustrating delays, especially with complex issues like group bookings.
Edge: ASI WebRes.
innRoad dramatically surpasses ASI in integrations, with 34 verified partners versus ASI’s 19. Shared integrations include Akia and Inn-Flow, but innRoad offers unique partners such as QuickBooks, Revinate, and RateGain, covering more external systems for payments, marketing, and analytics.
ASI’s integrations focus more on industry-specific solutions like SiteMinder, Duetto, and Cendyn, but innRoad’s extensive partner list offers broader operational flexibility.
Edge: innRoad.
Recent reviews favor innRoad for overall satisfaction, particularly in the small-to-mid-sized hotel segment. InnRoad’s reviews mention a 4.67/5 rating from 191 recent reviews, with properties noting revenue increases and improved operational efficiency.
ASI’s reviews, though fewer, are uniformly positive about usability and support, but the lack of recent reviews and a 0/5 overall rating indicate declining engagement or updates.
Edge: innRoad.
Both products do not publicly list specific pricing. Typically, costs depend on the size of your property, required modules, and integration needs. ASI offers a flat rate with no implementation fee or trial, while innRoad’s pricing is also quote-based, emphasizing no hidden fees or contracts.
For precise costs, contact vendors directly to tailor a package suited to your hotel’s scale.
Not ideal if you primarily need a standalone booking engine without broader management features.
Not ideal if you require a full PMS or complex property management tools outside reservations.
The core difference between ASI WebRes and innRoad lies in the scope of their solutions. ASI offers a full property management system with reservation capabilities, while innRoad specializes in an online booking engine designed to maximize reservations and guest satisfaction.
Choose ASI WebRes if you need a comprehensive hotel management platform capable of handling complex operations across multiple properties. Its 20+ years of support and stability make it ideal for larger or multi-property hotels.
Opt for innRoad if your primary goal is to increase direct bookings and guest onboarding efficiency. Its extensive feature set, recent reviews, and active development make it the better choice for small to medium-sized hotels focused on online growth.
In summary, for a full hotel management solution with trusted support, go with ASI WebRes; for a dedicated, high-converting booking engine, innRoad is the recommended choice.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,ASI WebRes 和 innRoad Booking Engine 共享 25 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 团体预订引擎 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 19 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 5 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户支持服务通常因响应迅速、知识渊博、及时解决问题而受到称赞。然而,也有人提到响应速度慢,以及与英语不流利的支持人员沟通不畅,这可能会让用户感到沮丧。
用户经常提到 InnRoad 提供的高度定制和灵活性,特别是在房间外观、计费功能和报告方面。这使酒店能够根据其特定需求定制软件,从而提高运营效率和客人满意度。
预订仪表板和综合报告功能因其提供可操作见解和简化数据管理的能力而备受瞩目。这些工具可帮助酒店经理跟踪入住率、收入和其他关键绩效指标,从而更轻松地做出明... 预订仪表板和综合报告功能因其提供可操作见解和简化数据管理的能力而备受瞩目。这些工具可帮助酒店经理跟踪入住率、收入和其他关键绩效指标,从而更轻松地做出明智的决策并提高整体酒店绩效。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户对该系统管理费率和付款(包括费率变更和分期付款)的能力表示赞赏。然而,有些人认为这些功能复杂且耗时,这表明需要更精简的流程来提高效率和客户满意度。
一些用户报告称,用户界面出现故障且加载速度缓慢,这可能会扰乱日常操作。系统冻结和功能错误等问题表明需要增强稳定性和速度。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ASI WebRes 和 innRoad Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。ASI WebRes 提供 19 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 innRoad Booking Engine 提供 34 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。ASI WebRes 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ASI WebRes:否。innRoad Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) 的 HT Score 为 0,innRoad 的为 34。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问