The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Assa Abloy 表现出色 .
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 57 |
在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Assa Abloy 用户最看重其 ,而 Counter 用户则强调 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Assa Abloy |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Assa Abloy |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #26 28 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | — | #46 4 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #32 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #31 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Assa Abloy |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #31 16 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | — | #44 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #43 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #32 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Assa Abloy |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #25 8 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #20 25 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #16 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #11 2 条评价 |
Choosing between Assa Abloy by Assa Abloy and Counter hinges on your hotel’s needs for property management software. Both aim to streamline operations, but Assa Abloy offers a less transparent, less reviewed solution, whereas Counter is a well-rated, feature-rich, and highly supported platform. Your decision will likely depend on whether your priority is a robust, proven system with comprehensive features or a more niche, hostels-focused solution.
Assa Abloy appears to lack recent reviews, leaving its effectiveness uncertain. Conversely, Counter has 54 recent reviews, a 4.73/5 overall rating, and 4.96/5 in customer support—making it the more reliable option and the clear choice for hoteliers seeking proven results.
Assa Abloy’s lack of recent reviews and a zero-star score suggest it may not be actively supported or trusted by hotels today. On the other hand, Counter’s recent reviews demonstrate high satisfaction, especially from hostel operators, with a 4.73/5 rating and a 91% likelihood to recommend. While Assa Abloy’s goal is to serve hotels broadly, its current review absence leaves its value in question.
Counter’s reviews highlight its ease of use, flexible features, and responsive customer service. Assa Abloy’s limited publicly available feedback makes it difficult to evaluate its support quality or feature set. Are you comfortable choosing a platform with no recent user feedback, or do you prefer one with proven, current hotel satisfaction?
If your hotel needs a property management system that is easy to implement, user-friendly, and already proven with a strong support network, Counter is the superior choice. Its high review count and recent feedback reflect its reliability and ongoing development, especially for hostels and small hotels.
However, if your hotel operates in a niche where Assa Abloy has specific integrations or features not publicly detailed, and you’re willing to accept the risk of limited recent reviews, it could be considered. For most hoteliers, Counter’s proven track record and extensive feature set make it the logical pick.
Counter’s user interface scores a 4.6/5, with reviews praising its intuitive design that simplifies staff training and daily operations. Users mention that onboarding is smooth, and the platform loads seamlessly on mobile browsers, enabling management from anywhere.
Assa Abloy offers no publicly available usability scores or recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge user experience confidently. Given the extensive feedback on Counter’s ease of use, it’s clear that your team will spend less time learning and more time managing. Edge: Counter.
Counter offers an array of 19 unique features, including channel management, payment processing, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, and multi-currency support, among others. Its features are tailored to increase operational efficiency and revenue, making it suitable for dynamic, tech-savvy properties.
Assa Abloy has no publicly confirmed features or integrations, leaving its capabilities uncertain. With Counter’s demonstrated feature set and the ability to adapt to various property types, it clearly provides more tools to improve your hotel’s operations. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s support is rated 4.96/5, with reviews praising the team’s responsiveness and professionalism. Specific testimonials mention staff like Evelyn and Max, who are noted for quick, helpful responses, even during urgent issues.
Assa Abloy has no recent reviews or publicly available support ratings, making its customer service reputation ambiguous. Given Counter’s consistently high support ratings and recent positive feedback, it offers more peace of mind. Edge: Counter.
Counter features seven verified integrations, including popular platforms like Stripe, Cloudbeds, Goki, and SiteMinder, providing diverse options for payment and distribution. Its integrations facilitate seamless operations, especially for multi-platform management.
Assa Abloy’s single verified partner, Yanolja Cloud Solution, limits its connectivity options significantly. If integrations with multiple OTAs, payment providers, or channel managers are vital to your operations, Counter is the clear leader. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s recent reviews and high ratings across different property segments emphasize its effectiveness and user satisfaction. Hostel operators, who make up the majority of Counter’s user base, especially praise its simplicity and support, with an average rating of 4.75/5 among hostel users.
Assa Abloy has no recent reviews or ratings, so its user satisfaction remains unknown. For hoteliers seeking validation from current users, Counter’s proven reputation makes it the preferred choice. Edge: Counter.
Both products do not advertise explicit pricing, indicating a likely custom quote or enterprise-level model. However, Counter’s pricing appears to include no upfront costs, with its free tier and no implementation fees making it accessible to small and medium-sized properties.
Assa Abloy’s lack of publicly available pricing or trial options suggests a potentially high or variable cost structure. For transparency and budget planning, Counter’s clear pricing approach offers better clarity. Edge: Counter.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Counter offers a comprehensive, feature-rich system with a proven track record, backed by recent reviews and high satisfaction ratings. Its extensive integrations, ease of use, and responsive support make it a dependable choice for most hotels, especially hostels and small properties.
Assa Abloy, while potentially suitable for certain niche markets or large properties, currently lacks recent validation through hotel reviews. Its limited publicly available information and support ratings make it a risky choice for hoteliers seeking proven, ongoing value.
If your priority is a reliable, well-supported PMS with modern features, Counter is the clear winner. Only consider Assa Abloy if regional or specific needs align tightly with its capabilities and you’re comfortable with the lack of recent user feedback.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Assa Abloy |
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Assa Abloy 和 Counter 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Assa Abloy |
|
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Assa Abloy 和 Counter 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Assa Abloy 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Counter 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Assa Abloy:否。Counter:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Assa Abloy 的 HT Score 为 0,Counter 的为 17。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问