Assa Abloy vs. Mews PMS: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 887 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 887 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Assa Abloy 表现出色 .

Mews 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Guest CRM.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Assa Abloy 与 Mews PMS 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 887 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
0
100
推荐可能性
0%
93%
易用性
0.0/5
4.7/5
客户支持
0.0/5
4.3/5
性价比
0.0/5
4.4/5
起始价格 Contact sales From $900/mo
经验证的评价 0 887

Assa Abloy 与 Mews PMS 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 887 条经验证的评价后,Assa Abloy 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Assa Abloy Mews Mews
优点
+ Ease of Use
+ Automation and Integrations
+ Customizability and Flexibility
+ 入职和支持
缺点
Billing and Invoicing
报告和分析
Multi-Property Management

Assa Abloy 对比 Mews:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Assa Abloy Mews Mews
小型(10-24 间客房) #3 329 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #1 397 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #3 45 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #3 49 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Assa Abloy Mews Mews
精品酒店 #1 483 条评价
豪华酒店 #5 220 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #2 170 条评价
长住酒店 #1 130 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Assa Abloy Mews Mews
北美 #8 106 条评价
欧洲 #1 660 条评价
亚太 #10 17 条评价
中东 #28 8 条评价

The Decision

Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can transform your hotel operations and guest experiences. Both Assa Abloy and Mews aim to address operational inefficiencies, but their approaches and maturity levels differ significantly. Assa Abloy, a legacy brand, is virtually unreviewed and untested in the current PMS landscape, whereas Mews offers a modern, cloud-based platform with hundreds of recent reviews. Will you entrust your hotel to a largely untested system or opt for a proven solution with robust user feedback?

Is Assa Abloy or Mews Better for Hotels?

Assa Abloy, traditionally known for locks and access control, has entered the PMS space but with no reviews or clear user feedback, making it impossible to gauge real-world performance. Mews, on the other hand, boasts over 750 recent reviews with a stellar overall rating of 4.62/5 and a high likelihood to recommend (93%). The recent reviews for Mews highlight its ease of use, extensive integrations, and operational automation, whereas Assa Abloy remains largely untested in this market segment.

While Assa Abloy’s offering might be rooted in physical security, its lack of recent user feedback leaves hoteliers uncertain about its effectiveness or adaptability. Mews’s proven track record demonstrates consistent customer satisfaction across diverse property types. Are you willing to gamble on an unproven legacy brand, or do you prefer a platform with validated success and ongoing innovation?

Mews PMS vs Assa Abloy: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich, cloud-based PMS with a broad ecosystem of integrations, go with Mews. It is especially suited for independent hotels, boutique properties, hostels, and chains looking for automation, real-time data, and guest-centric tools. Conversely, if your hotel primarily seeks a legacy, security-focused solution with a focus on physical access, Assa Abloy might seem appealing — but the lack of recent reviews and proven functionality makes this risky.

For hotels prioritizing ease of management, guest satisfaction, and operational scalability, Mews provides a clear advantage with its 59 unique features, extensive support, and continuous updates. Assa Abloy’s absence of review data and unclear feature set make it a less reliable choice for modern hotel management. Which platform aligns with your hotel’s growth and innovation goals?

Is Mews Easier to Use?

Mews consistently receives high praise for its user-friendly interface, earning a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating based on 98 recent reviews. Hotels describe it as intuitive, with a modern design that minimizes training time, and staff often note that they can operate the system with minimal onboarding. Assa Abloy, devoid of reviews, offers no comparable user feedback or usability ratings, leaving its ease of use highly uncertain.

Mews also scores well on onboarding, with many users highlighting smooth implementation and ongoing support. In contrast, Assa Abloy’s lack of recent feedback means you cannot gauge how easily your team would adopt its system. Edge: Mews.

Which Has Better Features: Assa Abloy or Mews?

Mews provides 59 integrations and features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, flexible booking engine, online check-in, automated reminders, and detailed reporting—features critical for modern hospitality. Assa Abloy offers no listed features or integrations, raising questions about its capabilities outside physical access control.

The extensive feature set of Mews supports a fully digital, guest-centric operation, while Assa Abloy’s offering appears limited to basic or physical security functions. For comprehensive operational management, Mews clearly leads. Edge: Mews.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Assa Abloy or Mews?

Mews’s support ratings include a 4.27/5 score based on recent reviews, with users praising their responsiveness and proactive onboarding. Many mention that support is a key factor in their positive experience, even when encountering minor bugs, which are typically addressed quickly.

Assa Abloy does not provide recent review data or specific support feedback, making it impossible to assess its support quality. Given Mews’s established reputation for customer service, it’s the safer choice. Edge: Mews.

Which Has More Integrations: Assa Abloy or Mews?

Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including over 1,000 through its marketplace, with notable partners like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing. These integrations cover revenue management, PMS, channel management, POS, guest communication, and more.

Assa Abloy has only one verified partner listed, which is insufficient for a modern hotel operation that relies on a connected tech ecosystem. For flexibility and scale, Mews stands far ahead. Edge: Mews.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Assa Abloy or Mews?

Mews’s recent reviews show an overall rating of 4.62/5, with a 93% likelihood to recommend, based on 98 reviews in the last six months. Hoteliers across segments—boutique, city center, hostel, and chain hotels—praise its ease of use, automation, and support.

Assa Abloy, lacking reviews, cannot be rated. Its unproven status in the hotel PMS market makes Mews the clear favorite for hoteliers seeking validated satisfaction and ongoing updates. Edge: Mews.

How Much Do Assa Abloy and Mews Cost?

Assa Abloy’s pricing details are not publicly available, and there’s no indication of a trial or transparent fee structure. Mews charges a flat monthly fee of $900, with no implementation or additional costs listed.

The opaque pricing of Assa Abloy makes budgeting difficult, while Mews’s transparent model allows hotels to plan more effectively. Given the lack of data for Assa Abloy, Mews offers a clearer value proposition.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Assa Abloy?

  • Hotels that primarily need physical security or access control integrated with property management.
  • Hotels with minimal reliance on digital operations or automation.
  • Properties that prefer legacy, hardware-focused solutions and are not concerned with modern software ecosystems.
  • Hotels in markets where Assa Abloy’s regional presence or support is sufficient.

Not ideal if:

  • You want a full-featured, modern PMS.
  • Your hotel values automation, guest engagement, or real-time data.
  • You need extensive integrations and cloud-based tools.
  • Your property is part of a multi-property chain seeking centralized management.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Mews?

  • Boutique, independent, and lifestyle hotels seeking automation and a guest-centric approach.
  • Hostels, small chains, or properties with complex room types and revenue management needs.
  • Hotels prioritizing ease of use, quick onboarding, and extensive integrations.
  • Properties aiming for digital check-in/out, automated guest communication, and real-time reporting.

Not ideal if:

  • You operate a legacy hotel relying solely on traditional systems.
  • Your property requires highly specialized or legacy hardware integrations outside Mews’s ecosystem.
  • You prefer on-premise or hardware-heavy solutions.

Mews vs Assa Abloy: The Bottom Line for Hotels

Mews offers a comprehensive, cloud-native PMS with broad integrations, proven user satisfaction, and continuous innovation. It supports operational agility and enhances guest experiences, making it ideal for the modern hotel.

Assa Abloy, largely untested in this space, might serve niche physical security needs but lacks the features, support, and user feedback to make it a reliable PMS choice. For scalable growth, automation, and a digital-first approach, Mews is the clear winner.

When to choose Mews:

  • You want a proven, feature-rich platform with ongoing support.
  • Your hotel values automation, integrations, and guest engagement.
  • You need a scalable, cloud-based solution with recent user validation.

When to consider Assa Abloy:

  • Your primary need is physical security or access control.
  • You operate in a niche market where Assa Abloy’s offerings suffice.
  • You are willing to risk the untested nature of Assa Abloy’s PMS in exchange for its security products.

Conclusion:
For most hotels seeking a modern, reliable, and scalable PMS, Mews stands out as the smarter choice backed by recent reviews and extensive features. Assa Abloy remains unproven, and its lack of current user feedback makes it a risky gamble for your hotel’s future.

Assa Abloy 和 Mews PMS 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Assa Abloy Mews Mews
Starting Price From $900/mo

Assa Abloy 有哪些 Mews PMS 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Assa Abloy 和 Mews PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Assa Abloy Mews Mews
多币种
多种语言
客人资料
客户关系管理
收益管理模块
预订引擎

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 47 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:Assa Abloy 对比 Mews(按业务目标)

我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本
Assa Abloy

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Mews Episode Tbilisi 小型
+ Zero connection fee costs
+ 11.9% booking engine conversion rate (average for independent hotels is 3.3%)
+ 9% higher ADR for direct bookings compared to OTAs

"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."

Nikoloz Cherkezishvili
Nikoloz Cherkezishvili
Co-Founder & CEO, Episode Hotels
提高运营效率
Assa Abloy

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Mews Aplend Apartments 中型
+ Five properties went live in the space of two weeks
+ One week from welcome call to go live date for several resorts
+ 80% faster to train new staff, cutting time from five working days to just one

"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."

Matej Matejka
Matej Matejka
Owner, Aplend Group
改善宾客体验
Assa Abloy

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Mews Leven Manchester 小型
+ 33% of guests use online check-in
+ 9% higher ADR for guests who use online check-in
+ Up to an hour saved per day for the front desk team

"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."

Kris Doyle
Kris Doyle
General Manager, Leven Manchester

Assa Abloy 对比 Mews:总结

Assa Abloy
0.0/5 来自 0 条评价
0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 1 个集成
查看资料
Mews
Mews
4.7/5 来自 887 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

Ease of Use 89% 正面

Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.

Automation and Integrations 69% 正面

Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.

Customizability and Flexibility 69% 正面

Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

Billing and Invoicing 77% 负面

Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.

报告和分析 60% 负面

虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。

独特功能

多种语言 多币种 收益管理模块 预订引擎 客户关系管理
4.7/5 易用性 4.3/5 客户支持 335 个集成
访问官网

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Mews 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
易用性 Mews 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)
客户支持 Mews 4.3 vs 0.0 (+4.3)
性价比 Mews 4.4 vs 0.0 (+4.4)
入职培训 Mews 4.4 vs 0.0 (+4.4)

关于 Assa Abloy 与 Mews PMS 的常见问题

Assa Abloy 能否替代 Mews PMS?

这取决于您的需求。Assa Abloy 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Assa Abloy 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 335 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Assa Abloy 或 Mews PMS 是否提供免费方案?

Assa Abloy:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Assa Abloy 和 Mews PMS?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Assa Abloy 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息