The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 66 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Septeo Hospitality 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Ancillary revenue tracking.
Casablanca 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest App and Mobile App.
基于 HTR 上 66 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 66 |
在分析了 66 条经验证的评价后,Septeo Hospitality 用户最看重其 ,而 Casablanca 用户则强调 支持质量, 用户友好性, 持续改进。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持质量
▾
|
|
|
+
用户友好性
▾
|
|
|
+
持续改进
▾
|
|
|
+
定制和灵活性
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
额外费用
▾
|
|
|
−
收益管理和收入优化
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #21 44 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #34 14 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #42 11 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #36 8 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #37 6 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #33 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #55 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #13 62 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel's efficiency and guest experience. Both ASTERIO by Septeo Hospitality and Casablanca hotelsoftware aim to streamline operations, but their offerings and market presence differ significantly. While ASTERIO’s lack of recent reviews and ratings suggests a limited current footprint, Casablanca’s active user base and recent positive feedback make it a more reliable choice today. Which of these solutions better aligns with your hotel’s needs?
ASTERIO offers a broad set of features that cover a variety of hotel activities, including food service, wellness, and activity management, all accessible through a single web-based interface. Casablanca, however, focuses on core hotel operations with a strong emphasis on automation, yield management, and multi-property management, boasting a large and active user base. Given the lack of recent reviews and a 0/5 rating, ASTERIO’s market validation appears minimal, whereas Casablanca’s 60 reviews, with nearly all recent, reflect ongoing user satisfaction.
The critical difference lies in their user feedback: Casablanca supports their claims with high satisfaction scores, whereas ASTERIO’s absence of recent reviews makes its current performance uncertain. Are you willing to adopt a solution without recent user validation, or do you prefer a product with proven, current hotel support?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, multi-activity platform that integrates food, wellness, and other services, ASTERIO might seem appealing—especially with its flexible, web-based design. Still, given its lack of reviews and no visible recent customer feedback, Casablanca is the more dependable choice for hotels seeking proven support and a high satisfaction rate.
For hotels that prioritize automation, yield management, and multi-property scalability, Casablanca is the better pick. Its 4.82/5 customer support rating and 9.87/10 NPS score, backed by 60 recent reviews, demonstrate strong confidence among users. Conversely, ASTERIO’s limited data and no ratings suggest it’s untested or possibly inactive in today’s market.
CASABLANCA scores a 4.8/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and friendly support staff. Users specifically highlight its straightforward operation and rapid support response, often describing it as “very easy to navigate” and “support that’s always there when needed.”
In contrast, ASTERIO has a zero-star rating across all categories, indicating it lacks recent user feedback or perhaps even active customer engagement. Without any recent reviews or usability ratings, it's impossible to assess its user-friendliness or onboarding quality.
Edge: Casablanca.
CASABLANCA offers 33 shared features with ASTERIO, plus 7 unique functionalities like Guest App, Integrated ID & Passport Scanner, Mobile App, and Shift Planning. Its features support multi-property management, automated invoicing, yield management, and guest communication, which are heavily praised by users.
ASTERIO provides 11 features exclusive to its platform, including EPoS, payment processing, ancillary revenue tracking, and a housekeeping module—features valuable for multi-activity hotels but lacking broader adoption evidence. The absence of recent reviews and customer feedback diminishes confidence in ASTERIO’s feature stability and effectiveness.
Edge: Casablanca.
Casablanca’s customer support scores nearly perfect at 4.82/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, competent responses, even during weekends. Users appreciate its proactive development and ongoing system improvements, with comments like “support is always responsive and helpful.”
ASTERIO’s support ratings are nonexistent, indicating no recent customer feedback or active engagement. Without current data, we cannot confirm its support quality or responsiveness.
Edge: Casablanca.
Casablanca boasts 46 verified integrations, including popular partners like Profitroom, Betterspace GmbH, and Onity, offering extensive connectivity for multi-property and revenue management needs. It also shares key integrations like Customer Alliance and SiteMinder.
ASTERIO’s 13 verified integrations, including Septeo’s proprietary partners like SPOTPILOT and HiJiffy, are fewer and less diverse. The limited integration ecosystem suggests it may not support as many third-party tools or future expansion.
Edge: Casablanca.
Casablanca’s recent reviews reflect an overall 9.87/10 NPS score, with nearly all users (98%) willing to recommend it. Reviews come from diverse property types—large hotels, resorts, B&Bs—and consistently praise its usability, support, and features.
ASTERIO’s reviews are nonexistent or outdated, with no recent ratings to indicate current user sentiment. This lack of recent feedback makes Casablanca the clear leader in current user satisfaction.
Edge: Casablanca.
Pricing details for ASTERIO are unavailable, suggesting it may be bespoke or outdated. Casablanca does not list a fixed price, indicating custom quotes based on hotel size but no ongoing subscription fees or implementation costs are publicly disclosed.
Both products do not offer free tiers or straightforward pricing models, emphasizing the need for direct engagement with vendors for accurate quotes.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Casablanca stands out as the more reliable and well-supported PMS, especially given its recent reviews and high satisfaction scores. Its extensive feature set, proven support, and active user base make it suitable for a wide range of hotel types, from small inns to large chains.
ASTERIO, while potentially versatile for multi-activity operations, lacks recent validation through user reviews and ratings, making it less recommended unless your hotel’s operations are highly specialized and you’re prepared to assume greater risk.
If your hotel needs a trusted, well-supported solution with proven performance, Casablanca is the clear choice. It offers a solid platform that aligns with modern hotel management demands, backed by active customers and extensive integrations.
Choose ASTERIO only if your hotel’s operational scope aligns precisely with its offered features and you have confidence in its current market presence—something that current data does not strongly support.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,ASTERIO (by Septeo Hospitality) 和 CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 共享 33 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 6 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In the last two years, we have intensively worked with the hotelsoftware and analyzed all processes down to the smallest detail and, based on this, implemented the appropriate resu..."
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论都强调了卡萨布兰卡的出色支持,指出其响应时间快、员工能力强、友好。用户对即使在周末和节假日也能提供支持表示赞赏,这让许多酒店经营者感到放心,他... 许多评论都强调了卡萨布兰卡的出色支持,指出其响应时间快、员工能力强、友好。用户对即使在周末和节假日也能提供支持表示赞赏,这让许多酒店经营者感到放心,他们可以获得持续可靠的帮助。
评论一致称赞 Casablanca 易于使用且直观的界面,让经验丰富的员工和新员工都能快速上手。一些用户指出,随着软件的发展,它有时会对新手用户变得有点复杂。
用户对 Casablanca 不断添加新功能并根据客户反馈改进其可用性表示赞赏。不过,一些人指出,他们希望新功能的实施时间更加透明,并有时间表。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户普遍担心的是更新和新界面带来的额外成本,这对规模较小的酒店来说可能是个问题。尽管人们对该软件的功能普遍满意,但这一方面被认为是缺点。
许多用户强调卡萨布兰卡的收益管理和动态定价工具对于增加收入至关重要。收益价格、图形预订路线和追加销售机会等功能有助于提高财务业绩。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ASTERIO (by Septeo Hospitality) 和 CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。ASTERIO (by Septeo Hospitality) 提供 13 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 提供 46 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ASTERIO (by Septeo Hospitality):否。CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Septeo Hospitality 的 HT Score 为 0,Casablanca 的为 68。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问