The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 615 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Casablanca 表现出色 在 支持质量 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest App and Guest Messaging.
HOTELTIME 表现出色 在 user interface and learning curve 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Guest CRM.
基于 HTR 上 615 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 66 | 549 |
在分析了 615 条经验证的评价后,Casablanca 用户最看重其 支持质量, 用户友好性, 持续改进,而 HOTELTIME 用户则强调 user interface and learning curve, 技术支援, reporting and analytics。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持质量
▾
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
+
用户友好性
▾
|
+
技术支援
▾
|
|
+
持续改进
▾
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
+
定制和灵活性
▾
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
额外费用
▾
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
−
收益管理和收入优化
▾
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
−
移动优化
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #21 44 条评价 | #5 219 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #34 14 条评价 | #3 238 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 46 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #8 7 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #42 11 条评价 | #5 239 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #36 8 条评价 | #3 241 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #37 6 条评价 | #4 143 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #33 5 条评价 | #4 49 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #55 2 条评价 | #52 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #13 62 条评价 | #2 384 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #5 111 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #1 21 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can make or break your hotel's operations, guest experience, and revenue. Both Casablanca and HotelTime aim to streamline your hotel management but do so with different strengths and focal points. Casablanca offers a more traditional, comprehensive software with a strong focus on multi-property management and guest communication. HotelTime, on the other hand, is a cloud-based, highly integrated platform with a broader feature set and a more recent, larger user base. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Casablanca and HotelTime both address core hotel management challenges like reservations, billing, and guest interaction. Casablanca’s system is designed for hotels that value flexibility, multi-property management, and detailed guest communication—particularly suited for boutique and resort properties. HotelTime excels with its cloud infrastructure, extensive integrations, and scalability, making it ideal for properties seeking high automation and real-time access.
While Casablanca’s latest reviews are sparse, its loyal, supportive customer base highlights its stability and depth. HotelTime boasts over 430 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, automation, and broad feature set. As the larger and more actively reviewed platform, HotelTime delivers more current insights and user satisfaction. Do you prefer a system with a longstanding reputation or a more modern, flexible platform?
If your hotel needs a highly flexible, cloud-based system that offers extensive integrations and automation, HotelTime is the clear choice. Its large user base, with more than 430 reviews and an average rating of 4.83/5, indicates strong current satisfaction, especially among resorts and city hotels.
Conversely, if your hotel operates multiple properties and values specialized features like guest messaging, shift planning, and centralized communication, Casablanca’s system might be better. Its focus on multi-property management and high customer support ratings (4.82/5) suggest it's optimized for complex operations. For most hotels today, especially those looking for real-time, cloud access, HotelTime’s recent reviews and higher overall rating make it the stronger option.
Casablanca’s user interface receives a 4.8/5 rating and is praised for its straightforward, intuitive design, enabling staff to adapt quickly. Its onboarding process is rated highly at 4.74/5, with users mentioning that new employees can start managing operations efficiently within days.
HotelTime’s platform also scores well at 4.66/5, with users emphasizing the system’s user-friendly interface and clear navigation. Support staff provide detailed onboarding, and the platform’s automation features reduce the learning curve further. While both are easy to adopt, Casablanca's slightly higher ease-of-use rating gives it a slight edge for teams prioritizing quick staff onboarding.
Edge: Casablanca
Casablanca offers 34 shared features and six exclusive functionalities, including guest apps, messaging, on-premise management, SMS communication, and shift planning. These are tailored for hotels prioritizing direct guest engagement and operational flexibility.
HotelTime provides a broader suite with 17 features unique to its platform, such as POS integration, guest CRM, ancillary revenue tracking, online checkout, and automated night audit. Its extensive integration capabilities with third-party systems enhance operational automation across departments.
Given HotelTime’s larger array of specialized modules and integrations, it offers more advanced tools for comprehensive hotel management. For feature depth, HotelTime clearly leads.
Edge: HotelTime
Casablanca’s support is consistently rated 4.82/5, with reviews highlighting rapid response times, professional staff, and ongoing development tailored to customer needs. Many users appreciate the personal touch and competence that helps resolve issues quickly, boosting confidence in its reliability.
HotelTime’s support scores slightly lower at 4.73/5 but is praised for responsiveness and ongoing platform updates. Users commend the team’s helpfulness, especially during onboarding, though some note that extended support hours could improve.
On the whole, Casablanca’s support appears more highly rated and more recent reviews reinforce its strong reputation.
Edge: Casablanca
HotelTime offers 58 verified integrations, including popular tools like STAAH, AeroGuest, and My Green Butler, providing a flexible, interconnected tech environment. Casablanca has 46 verified partners, with common integrations like Profitroom, SiteMinder, and RoomPriceGenie, but fewer exclusive options.
HotelTime’s larger number of integrations supports a broader operational scope, especially for properties relying on diverse third-party systems. For this reason, HotelTime has a slight edge in connectivity options.
Edge: HotelTime
HotelTime’s user ratings are notably higher, with a 4.83/5 overall rating based on 433 reviews and recent positive feedback emphasizing its ease of use, automation, and support. Its recent reviews reveal consistent satisfaction across hotel segments, especially resorts and city hotels.
Casablanca’s reviews are fewer and less recent, with a 0/5 overall rating in public review summaries (likely a rating discrepancy), but support ratings are high at 4.82/5. Nonetheless, the volume and freshness of HotelTime reviews make it the more trusted choice today.
Edge: HotelTime
Casablanca does not publicly list its pricing, suggesting a bespoke quote based on hotel size and needs. This can mean higher costs for smaller hotels but potentially more tailored service for larger operations.
HotelTime charges a flat $600 monthly fee, with no additional implementation or setup fees. Its transparent pricing makes it easier to budget, especially for small and medium-sized hotels seeking predictable costs.
If budget clarity is essential, HotelTime offers a more straightforward, predictable model.
Edge: HotelTime
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Casablanca and HotelTime each serve distinct needs within the hotel industry. Casablanca is a solid choice for hotels prioritizing guest communication, multi-property management, and personalized support. Its recent reviews reinforce its stability and user satisfaction, especially for larger chains or resorts.
HotelTime, with its broader feature set, extensive integrations, and cloud architecture, is better suited for hotels seeking automation, scalability, and real-time access. Its large volume of recent reviews and higher ratings make it the more reliable pick for modern, growing properties.
If you want a highly integrated, scalable cloud platform with a proven track record, HotelTime is the clear winner. For hotels that value detailed guest interaction and multi-property control, Casablanca remains a strong contender, especially given its support reputation.
In conclusion, HotelTime’s more recent reviews, larger user base, and wider feature set position it as the preferable choice for most hotels today.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 和 HotelTime PMS 共享 34 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 集中消息传递 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 11 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 9 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
"In the last two years, we have intensively worked with the hotelsoftware and analyzed all processes down to the smallest detail and, based on this, implemented the appropriate resu..."
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论都强调了卡萨布兰卡的出色支持,指出其响应时间快、员工能力强、友好。用户对即使在周末和节假日也能提供支持表示赞赏,这让许多酒店经营者感到放心,他... 许多评论都强调了卡萨布兰卡的出色支持,指出其响应时间快、员工能力强、友好。用户对即使在周末和节假日也能提供支持表示赞赏,这让许多酒店经营者感到放心,他们可以获得持续可靠的帮助。
评论一致称赞 Casablanca 易于使用且直观的界面,让经验丰富的员工和新员工都能快速上手。一些用户指出,随着软件的发展,它有时会对新手用户变得有点复杂。
用户对 Casablanca 不断添加新功能并根据客户反馈改进其可用性表示赞赏。不过,一些人指出,他们希望新功能的实施时间更加透明,并有时间表。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户普遍担心的是更新和新界面带来的额外成本,这对规模较小的酒店来说可能是个问题。尽管人们对该软件的功能普遍满意,但这一方面被认为是缺点。
许多用户强调卡萨布兰卡的收益管理和动态定价工具对于增加收入至关重要。收益价格、图形预订路线和追加销售机会等功能有助于提高财务业绩。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
虽然支持团队的响应速度和乐于助人的态度值得赞赏,但一些评论指出,延长技术支持时间将进一步提升用户体验,确保随时都能获得帮助,特别是对于国际用户而言。
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 和 HotelTime PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 提供 46 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 HotelTime PMS 提供 58 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
CASABLANCA hotelsoftware (PMS):否。HotelTime PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Casablanca 的 HT Score 为 68,HOTELTIME 的为 92。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问