The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 104 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Septeo Hospitality 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Spa & Wellness Module.
myCloud Hospitality PMS 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Guest CRM.
基于 HTR 上 104 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 104 |
在分析了 104 条经验证的评价后,Septeo Hospitality 用户最看重其 ,而 myCloud Hospitality PMS 用户则强调 支持团队, 用户友好性, 与 ota 集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
|
|
+
用户友好性
▾
|
|
|
+
与 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
|
+
详细报告
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
移动应用程序
▾
|
|
|
−
系统缓慢
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #14 67 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #19 29 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #27 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #34 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #16 48 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #14 49 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #12 35 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #36 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #41 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #50 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #7 93 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #19 1 条评价 |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel's daily operations, guest experience, and revenue growth. Both ASTERIO by Septeo Hospitality and myCloud Hospitality PMS aim to streamline these tasks, but they diverge significantly in maturity, user feedback, and market presence. While ASTERIO offers extensive features tailored for complex operations, it lacks recent reviews and a strong user base, raising questions about ongoing support and reliability. Conversely, myCloud Hospitality PMS, with over 95 reviews and a 4.81/5 overall rating, stands out as the more tested and trusted option. What should you prioritize: extensive features or proven performance?
Both products address core hotel management needs like reservations, billing, and guest communication, but their approaches differ. ASTERIO emphasizes a broad suite of services—including spa, wellness, and activity management—aiming for a comprehensive experience. However, with no recent reviews and a 0/5 rating, confidence in its current performance is low. In contrast, myCloud Hospitality PMS has recent, highly positive reviews, emphasizing ease of use, integration, and customer support. Do you want a system with a proven track record or one that promises more but lacks recent validation?
If your hotel requires a user-friendly, reliable, and well-reviewed system with strong support, myCloud Hospitality PMS is the clear choice due to its high ratings, recent reviews, and extensive integrations. Larger or more complex operations might consider ASTERIO if they need specialized modules like spa or wellness, but its lack of recent feedback makes this less advisable currently. For small to medium-sized hotels prioritizing operational efficiency and proven support, myCloud is the safer option.
Customer reviews for myCloud Hospitality PMS highlight a highly intuitive interface, with a 4.79/5 ease of use rating and supportive onboarding. Users mention quick setup, straightforward navigation, and minimal staff training. ASTERIO’s user experience is less clear—lacking recent reviews, its ease of use cannot be confidently assessed. The absence of current user feedback suggests potential usability issues or an untested interface. Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
ASTERO boasts 43 shared features plus one unique (Spa & Wellness Module), catering to diverse hotel services. myCloud Hospitality PMS offers 16 exclusive features, including multi-currency, multi-lingual support, integrated CRS, guest profiles, a mobile app, and advanced automation tools. Its features are well-suited for modern hotels seeking digital guest engagement and automation. Given the extensive feature set and recent positive reviews, myCloud’s feature richness provides a significant advantage. Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
Customer feedback for myCloud Hospitality PMS highlights consistently high support ratings (4.83/5), with reviewers praising quick responses and helpful assistance. Several reviews call out their support team as a key reason for satisfaction. ASTERIO’s support is unreviewed, and with no recent feedback, confidence in ongoing support is low. Given current data, myCloud clearly offers superior support reliability. Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
myCloud Hospitality PMS has 29 verified integrations, including key partners like Sage, Lybra Tech, and Booking.com, with 4 shared partners with ASTERIO. ASTERIO offers 13 verified integrations, primarily with local or niche providers. The broader ecosystem of myCloud supports more seamless operations across platforms, an essential for growing hotels. Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
With 95 recent reviews, myCloud Hospitality PMS boasts a 4.81/5 rating, especially favored in boutique, resort, and branded hotel segments. Reviews praise its ease of use, support, and integration for these property types. ASTERIO's lack of recent reviews and ratings make it impossible to assess current user satisfaction. Based on recent data, hoteliers rate myCloud higher. Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
Details for ASTERIO’s pricing are unavailable, suggesting it might be tailored or on a custom quote basis. myCloud Hospitality PMS charges $900 per month, with no free tier or trial. The transparency and affordability of myCloud’s fixed monthly fee make it easier for hotels to plan budgets.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in market validation: myCloud Hospitality PMS benefits from 95 recent reviews and a 4.81/5 rating, making it the more trusted choice today. ASTERIO aims to be an all-in-one platform for diverse services but lacks recent user feedback, raising questions about support and usability.
Choose ASTERIO if your hotel requires a broad suite of modules for multiple service types and you can verify its current performance. But for most hotels—especially those prioritizing ease of use, support, and proven results—myCloud Hospitality PMS offers a more reliable, well-supported solution.
If operational simplicity, recent positive feedback, and integration are your priorities, go with myCloud Hospitality PMS. However, if your hotel needs extensive, multi-service management and you are confident in ASTERIO’s capabilities, it could be a fit—just ensure current support and performance are verified before proceeding.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,ASTERIO (by Septeo Hospitality) 和 myCloud Hospitality PMS 共享 43 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 礼品券和预付体验 | ||
| 综合 CRS |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 5 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然这不是一个独特的功能,但出色的客户支持是一个反复出现的主题。用户一致称赞支持团队的响应能力和乐于助人,强调他们在迅速解决问题方面发挥的作用。
酒店经营者一致称赞 mycloud PMS 直观且用户友好的界面。这种易用性有助于快速培训员工并顺利开展日常运营,即使没有丰富技术知识的员工也能轻松使用。
用户经常提到 mycloud 与 Booking.com、Agoda 和 Expedia 等在线旅行社的无缝集成。这种集成简化了预订流程,提高了酒店入住率,简化了价格管理,为酒店经营者增... 用户经常提到 mycloud 与 Booking.com、Agoda 和 Expedia 等在线旅行社的无缝集成。这种集成简化了预订流程,提高了酒店入住率,简化了价格管理,为酒店经营者增加了收入机会。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论指出,缺乏移动应用程序是一个重大缺陷。用户表示需要一款移动应用程序来随时随地管理操作,他们认为这将进一步提高系统的灵活性和可用性。
有些用户报告称,mycloud PMS 偶尔会变慢,通常将其归因于互联网连接问题。虽然基于云的特性是有益的,但这也意味着系统的性能可能会受到网络速度的影响。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ASTERIO (by Septeo Hospitality) 和 myCloud Hospitality PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。ASTERIO (by Septeo Hospitality) 提供 13 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 myCloud Hospitality PMS 提供 29 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。myCloud Hospitality PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ASTERIO (by Septeo Hospitality):否。myCloud Hospitality PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Septeo Hospitality 的 HT Score 为 0,myCloud Hospitality PMS 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问