项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 871 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
myCloud Hospitality PMS 表现出色 在 customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Guest Messaging.
Oracle Hospitality 表现出色 在 云集成和移动性 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的住宿设施 (4.2/5) ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Housekeeping Mobile App.
基于 HTR 上 871 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | 起价 $700/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 110 | 761 |
在分析了 871 条经验证的评价后,myCloud Hospitality PMS 用户最看重其 客户支持与问题解决, 易用性 / 直观导航, 入职培训与培训,而 Oracle Hospitality 用户则强调 云集成和移动性, 定制化和灵活性, 与第三方系统集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持与问题解决
▾
|
+
云集成和移动性
▾
|
|
+
易用性 / 直观导航
▾
|
+
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
+
入职培训与培训
▾
|
+
与第三方系统集成
▾
|
|
+
报告和后台可见性
▾
|
+
预订和入住管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
产品开发速度与移动访问差距
▾
|
−
系统复杂性和学习曲线
▾
|
|
−
渠道管理器 / 预订同步
▾
|
−
运营中断和维护
▾
|
|
−
性能与速度问题
▾
|
−
成本问题
▾
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #13 73 条评价 | #17 64 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #19 30 条评价 | #2 319 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #24 5 条评价 | #1 268 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #31 1 条评价 | #1 87 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #16 55 条评价 | #5 249 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #13 52 条评价 | #1 481 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #12 37 条评价 | #1 348 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #37 2 条评价 | #6 36 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #42 1 条评价 | #9 97 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #54 0 条评价 | #5 192 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 102 条评价 | #2 398 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #20 1 条评价 | #2 17 条评价 |
Choosing between myCloud Hospitality PMS and Oracle OPERA PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and market presence, which can influence your decision.
myCloud Hospitality PMS offers a cloud-based, easy-to-use solution primarily targeted at small to medium-sized hotels and chains. Oracle OPERA PMS, on the other hand, is a comprehensive, enterprise-level platform designed for larger hotels and global chains seeking advanced integration and detailed analytics.
What’s the right fit for your property’s size, complexity, and growth plans? Let’s explore how these two systems compare.
Both products address core hotel management needs—reservation handling, guest profiles, and operational automation. myCloud Hospitality PMS is praised for its intuitive interface, quick setup, and tailored features for smaller to mid-sized hotels, while Oracle OPERA offers extensive customization, a broader feature set, and deep integration capabilities suited to large, complex properties.
The key difference is their target market — myCloud tends to serve boutique and independent hotels, while Oracle caters significantly to large hotel groups and resorts, sometimes with thousands of rooms. Do your hotel’s needs lean toward simplicity and ease of use or comprehensive, enterprise-level control?
If your hotel requires a straightforward, cloud-based platform with quick deployment and a focus on automating guest interactions, go with myCloud Hospitality PMS. Its recent reviews highlight a 4.81/5 overall rating with a 95 review count, demonstrating strong user satisfaction and recent positive feedback on ease of use.
Conversely, if your hotel is part of a large chain or needs robust customization, extensive third-party integrations, and detailed analytics, Oracle OPERA PMS is the better choice. With 696 reviews and a higher HT score (93.13 vs. 74.07), Oracle’s system is well-regarded for its scalability and enterprise features.
myCloud Hospitality PMS has a high ease-of-use rating of 4.79/5, with many reviews emphasizing its user-friendly, graphical interface and quick staff onboarding. Users praise its simplicity, with some noting it’s suitable for staff with limited technical backgrounds.
Oracle OPERA PMS scores slightly lower at 4.57/5 but remains accessible, especially considering its complexity. Its interface is designed for multi-user, multi-property environments, which can require more training.
Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
myCloud Hospitality PMS offers 59 features, including guest messaging, digital menus, mobile keys, and native email marketing—features tailored to enhancing guest experience and operational automation. It also integrates with popular third-party solutions like payment processors and booking engines.
Oracle OPERA PMS provides a comprehensive suite with over 54 shared features plus additional modules like shift planning, housekeeping mobile apps, and extensive revenue management tools. Its API ecosystem supports deep customization and integration with hundreds of external systems.
Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS for targeted features, Oracle for extensive, enterprise-level capabilities.
myCloud Hospitality PMS boasts a customer support rating of 4.83/5, with reviews emphasizing their quick, helpful responses and ongoing assistance. Many users mention the support team’s proactive approach in resolving issues swiftly.
Oracle OPERA’s support rating is 4.25/5, with some users citing delays in responses or difficulty navigating the support process. While support is generally professional, the scale and complexity sometimes hinder rapid resolutions.
Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
Oracle OPERA boasts a large ecosystem, with 391 verified partners, including critical integrations with POS, revenue management, and channel managers like SImphony POS and Oracle Hospitality Integration Platform (OHIP). Its extensive API support enables customized, multi-system integration.
myCloud Hospitality PMS offers 29 verified partners, including key integrations with OTAs and CRM solutions. While fewer in number, its integrations are well-loved for their reliability and relevance to small and mid-sized hotels.
Edge: Oracle OPERA for breadth and depth of integrations.
myCloud Hospitality PMS has a higher overall rating (4.81/5) based on 95 reviews, mostly from boutique, independent, and resort hotels, with recent reviews praising usability and support. Hotels of smaller size appreciate the simplicity and quick ROI.
Oracle OPERA’s rating is 4.18/5 from nearly 700 reviews, with larger hotel groups, chains, and resorts valuing its scalability and comprehensive features. Recent reviews acknowledge its effectiveness but note the steep learning curve.
Edge: myCloud Hospitality PMS.
myCloud Hospitality PMS charges a flat base price of $900 with no additional implementation or subscription fees. It does not specify tiered pricing but emphasizes its straightforward subscription model.
Oracle OPERA’s base price is $700, but additional costs for implementation, training, and modules can significantly increase the total cost, particularly for large property portfolios. Its pricing reflects its extensive capabilities, often making it a sizable investment.
Not ideal if your hotel needs complex, multi-property management or extensive enterprise integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel prioritizes simplicity, quick deployment, or has a limited budget.
myCloud Hospitality PMS excels for small to mid-sized hotels seeking a straightforward, user-friendly cloud platform with modern guest features. Its recent reviews highlight high satisfaction among boutique and independent hotels, especially those valuing ease of use and support.
Oracle OPERA is the preferred choice for large properties or hotel groups that require vast customization, comprehensive integration, and enterprise-level control. Its extensive feature set and scalability make it suitable for complex operations, although it demands more investment and staff training.
If your hotel is small to medium and values a quick, reliable, and simple solution, go with myCloud Hospitality PMS. For large, multi-property portfolios with complex needs, Oracle OPERA offers unmatched depth and flexibility.
酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | 起价 $700/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In many aspects, candidly, the ability to offload IT responsibilities to a reliable partner was a driving motivator in our decision to embrace OPERA Cloud."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"If you’ve used OPERA Cloud and have familiarity with Oracle processes, learning how to use Distribution is almost effortless. And when there was something we didn’t know how to do,..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"As general manager of Starling Hotel Residence Geneva – a 93-room property in Switzerland’s epicenter – I initially just wanted a system that would be reliable and allow staff to t..."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
支持是评论中最强的积极因素之一,用户表示团队知识丰富、响应迅速、能够快速解决问题。多条评论提到直接协助模块、故障排除和账户支持,这降低了依赖PMS日常运... 支持是评论中最强的积极因素之一,用户表示团队知识丰富、响应迅速、能够快速解决问题。多条评论提到直接协助模块、故障排除和账户支持,这降低了依赖PMS日常运营的酒店的运营中断。
评审者一致认为MyCloud PMS易于学习和操作,简化了培训负担,即使是前台经验有限的员工也能使用。这种易用性被定位为生产力提升,因为团队可以更快、更顺畅地完... 评审者一致认为MyCloud PMS易于学习和操作,简化了培训负担,即使是前台经验有限的员工也能使用。这种易用性被定位为生产力提升,因为团队可以更快、更顺畅地完成日常任务。
该平台因快速入职和帮助酒店上线而受到称赞,这对于需要快速部署的酒店来说非常有价值。与此同时,用户希望培训能超越前台、客房服务和预订,让酒店团队能更好地... 该平台因快速入职和帮助酒店上线而受到称赞,这对于需要快速部署的酒店来说非常有价值。与此同时,用户希望培训能超越前台、客房服务和预订,让酒店团队能更好地使用配置、费率加载和报告。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
一些用户希望更快地推出新功能和改进,建议产品可以通过更快的开发周期变得更具竞争力。其他用户指出缺乏移动应用或移动友好访问,这限制了需要在大屏幕之外进行... 一些用户希望更快地推出新功能和改进,建议产品可以通过更快的开发周期变得更具竞争力。其他用户指出缺乏移动应用或移动友好访问,这限制了需要在大屏幕之外进行操作的员工的可用性。
一个经常提及的运营优势是预订渠道、渠道管理器与PMS之间的顺畅同步,这有助于减少手动工作并支持更快的预订处理。主要的缺点是偶尔会出现同步失败,尽管评论者... 一个经常提及的运营优势是预订渠道、渠道管理器与PMS之间的顺畅同步,这有助于减少手动工作并支持更快的预订处理。主要的缺点是偶尔会出现同步失败,尽管评论者指出这些问题通常会被支持团队迅速解决。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Opera PMS 的云端特性支持远程访问,减轻了 IT 负担,并实现了多物业管理。用户对其基于互联网的功能表示赞赏,认为其增强了可访问性和可扩展性。然而,也有一些... Opera PMS 的云端特性支持远程访问,减轻了 IT 负担,并实现了多物业管理。用户对其基于互联网的功能表示赞赏,认为其增强了可访问性和可扩展性。然而,也有一些用户担心,由于依赖互联网,运营可能会出现中断。
用户非常欣赏 Opera PMS 灵活的系统配置,它允许自定义以满足独特的运营需求。然而,它存在数据准确性问题,例如创建重复的配置文件。
Opera PMS 能够与第三方系统(例如 POS 系统和分析系统)集成,从而统一酒店运营。一些用户强调了这项功能,它显著提高了运营效率,但也有人指出集成过程可能比... Opera PMS 能够与第三方系统(例如 POS 系统和分析系统)集成,从而统一酒店运营。一些用户强调了这项功能,它显著提高了运营效率,但也有人指出集成过程可能比较繁琐。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
Opera PMS 虽然功能丰富,但操作起来却比较复杂,新用户学习起来难度较大。培训和上手需要耗费大量时间,小型酒店可能会觉得定制和设置工作繁琐繁琐。
尽管 Opera PMS 具有基于云的优势,但它可能会在维护期间或由于互联网问题而出现运行中断,从而影响服务连续性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。myCloud Hospitality PMS 和 Oracle OPERA PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。myCloud Hospitality PMS 提供 29 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Oracle OPERA PMS 提供 390 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。myCloud Hospitality PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
myCloud Hospitality PMS:否。Oracle OPERA PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。myCloud Hospitality PMS 的 HT Score 为 75,Oracle Hospitality 的为 89。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐