The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #26 28 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | — | #46 4 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #32 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #31 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #31 16 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | — | #44 4 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #43 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #32 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #25 8 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #20 25 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #16 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #11 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel's operations, and with so many options, it’s vital to evaluate how they compare. AsyaSoft PMS by AsyaSoft and Counter by Counter both aim to streamline hotel and hostel management but differ significantly in maturity, features, and user feedback. Your decision should hinge on your specific property type, operational needs, and the support each platform offers. Are you looking for a highly-rated, feature-rich system or a simpler, more widely adopted solution?
Both products intend to solve core PMS problems: managing reservations, guest profiles, and operational workflows. AsyaSoft, however, has a minimal online presence, with no recent reviews or verified support, raising questions about its current viability. Counter, with over 54 recent reviews and a 4.73/5 overall rating, shows more evidence of active development and customer satisfaction. Do these differences suggest a clear winner?
AsyaSoft, despite its zero reviews and a lack of recent user feedback, appears to be a niche or outdated product with no verified integrations or customer support data. Its absence from regions and lack of updates make it unsuitable for most modern hotel operations. Counter, on the other hand, is actively used across 29 countries, boasts 54 recent reviews, and has a high user satisfaction score of 4.73/5. Its well-documented features and extensive integrations suggest a more reliable choice for hotels seeking proven technology.
While AsyaSoft offers no clear evidence of ongoing development or customer success stories, Counter’s recent reviews highlight its ease of use, strong support, and feature set. Given the absence of recent feedback for AsyaSoft, can you confidently rely on it to meet your hotel’s needs? Or does Counter’s active user base and recent favorable reviews provide a clearer path forward?
If your hotel requires a straightforward, simple PMS primarily for small-scale management, AsyaSoft’s lack of reviews and features makes it difficult to recommend. Conversely, if your property is a hostel or small hotel needing a feature-rich, multi-platform system with a proven track record, Counter is the clear choice.
Counter’s extensive feature set (19 unique features like channel management, booking engine, online support, and integrated POS) is designed specifically for the complex, multi-channel environment that many properties operate in today. Conversely, AsyaSoft’s minimal online presence and unverified capabilities suggest it may fall short of your operational demands, unless you’re considering an in-house or legacy solution with limited support.
Counter’s user interface consistently receives high praise, with a 4.6/5 ease of use score based on recent reviews. Hoteliers describe it as intuitive, simple, and quick to learn, with onboarding rated at 4.7/5 and support staff praised for responsiveness.
AsyaSoft’s lack of recent reviews means there is no data to assess its usability or onboarding experience. Its nonexistent review count indicates it’s either untested or no longer actively supported, making it impossible to judge the user experience confidently. Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 19 features exclusive to it, including a channel manager, booking engine, online support, automated night audit, and multi-currency options. These features directly address daily operational needs and revenue management, making it highly versatile for property types beyond small hostels.
AsyaSoft, with no verified features listed, provides no evidence of specific capabilities. Its absence from regional markets and lack of documented features suggest it may not deliver the comprehensive functionality needed for broader hotel management. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s customer support scores a near-perfect 4.96/5, with recent reviews praising the team’s responsiveness and professionalism—especially staff like Evelyn and Max. Reviewers appreciate quick replies and proactive assistance, which are vital in resolving everyday issues.
AsyaSoft’s support details are nonexistent, and with no recent reviews or user feedback, its support quality remains unverified. This lack of data raises concerns about ongoing assistance and issue resolution. Edge: Counter.
Counter boasts seven verified integrations, including channel managers like WuBook and SiteMinder, payment processors like Stripe, and platforms like Goki. These integrations allow for smoother operations, more distribution channels, and streamlined income management.
AsyaSoft has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other platforms and tools. For a property that relies on multiple online channels or payment methods, Counter’s integrations offer a decisive advantage. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s reviews are recent and plentiful, with a high overall rating of 4.73/5 from 54 hotelier reviews. Its user base comprises mainly hostels (83%) but also includes boutique hotels, city center hotels, and independent properties, all of which seem satisfied.
AsyaSoft’s rating is zero, and no reviews exist to illustrate user satisfaction or experience. Without recent feedback, it’s impossible to gauge how well it performs in real-world scenarios. Clearly, Counter is the more trusted and better-rated option. Edge: Counter.
AsyaSoft does not publish pricing details or offer a free trial, which suggests it might be a bespoke or legacy system requiring direct inquiry. Counter, similarly, does not specify pricing but states there are no implementation fees or tiered plans; it offers a straightforward, potentially flexible pricing model.
Given the lack of transparency around AsyaSoft, your hotel might struggle to evaluate its affordability. Counter’s open approach and no-cost trial indicate a more accessible path to understanding its value proposition.
Not ideal if your hotel needs reliable, feature-rich management with active support, integrations, and proven performance.
Not ideal if your hotel operates on a very tight budget without streamlined needs, or if you prefer a legacy system with limited functionality.
Counter’s core advantage lies in its active development, extensive features, and proven user satisfaction. Its 54 recent reviews and high ratings illustrate a platform that consistently addresses hoteliers’ operational needs, especially for hostels and small hotels relying on multiple online channels.
AsyaSoft, with no recent reviews or verified data, appears to be outdated or minimally supported. Its lack of features, integrations, and user feedback makes it unsuitable for most modern hotel operations seeking reliability and growth potential.
If your hotel requires a well-supported PMS with a proven track record, Counter is the clear choice. Its feature set, ease of use, and customer support make it a safer, more effective investment. Choose AsyaSoft only if you’re operating a very simple property in a region where it’s supported and are willing to accept risks related to limited ongoing support and development.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。AsyaSoft PMS 和 Counter 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。AsyaSoft PMS 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Counter 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
AsyaSoft PMS:否。Counter:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。AsyaSoft 的 HT Score 为 0,Counter 的为 17。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问