The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 887 条经验证的评价后,AsyaSoft 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | AsyaSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #28 8 条评价 |
Choosing between AsyaSoft PMS and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, the size of your operation, and your growth ambitions. While both promise to manage reservations and operations, their core strengths diverge significantly—AsyaSoft offers a minimal presence and limited features, whereas Mews is a comprehensive, cloud-based platform with a large, recent review base. Which solution better aligns with your hotel’s future?
AsyaSoft by AsyaSoft appears to target small, possibly local hotels with limited operational scope, evident from its zero reviews and lack of regional presence. In contrast, Mews boasts over 750 reviews, a 4.62/5 overall rating, and a presence in 54 countries, making it a globally recognized industry leader. Do you want a system that’s tried, tested, and widely adopted?
While AsyaSoft’s rating is nonexistent, Mews’s high scores in ease of use, support, and value—each above 4.2/5—highlight its maturity and user satisfaction. Mews’s recent reviews, especially those from hotels emphasizing enhanced operational efficiency, reinforce its reliability. Are you ready to invest in a proven platform with a broad ecosystem?
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich system capable of scaling across multiple properties, Mews is the clear choice. It’s especially suitable for boutique hotels, hostels, and chains eager for automation, integrations, and modern guest experiences. If your hotel is small, with limited operations and no regional expansion plans, AsyaSoft could suffice—though its lack of recent reviews raises questions about long-term viability.
For hotels prioritizing guest convenience, automation, and growth, Mews’s extensive feature set—including booking engine, guest CRM, channel management, and reporting—delivers immediate value. Conversely, AsyaSoft’s limited profile suggests it’s more of a local, perhaps legacy, solution without the capacity to support complex or expanding operations. Which aligns better with your strategic goals?
Mews scores 4.7/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Hotels like Leven Manchester and The Neighborhood Hotel commend its modern design and simple navigation, with many noting quick setup times. Its cloud-native platform allows staff to work remotely, further enhancing usability.
AsyaSoft’s UI and onboarding experience are unreviewed, but given its negligible review count, user feedback is unavailable. The absence of recent data suggests it may lack the refinements and modern design features that make Mews so user-friendly. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 unique features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, integrated channel management, guest CRM, online check-in, and real-time reporting. Its open API and marketplace enable extensive customization, with integrations that cover payments, housekeeping, group bookings, and more.
AsyaSoft has no verified features or integrations listed, indicating a minimal or legacy system that likely lacks the advanced functionalities needed for today’s hospitality demands. The sheer volume and depth of Mews’s features provide your team with tools to optimize operations and guest experiences. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support scores 4.27/5, with recent reviews reflecting prompt responsiveness and ongoing updates. Hotels like The Julius Prague and Hotel Lancaster appreciate Mews’s support teams, citing quick bug fixes and helpful onboarding, especially through its 24/7 live chat and onboarding programs.
AsyaSoft’s review score is unrecorded; with no recent reviews, support quality remains unverified. The lack of feedback and regional presence suggests limited support options, which could hinder your team’s adoption and troubleshooting. Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including top channel managers, revenue management systems, and payment providers. Its open API and Mews Marketplace offer access to over 1,000 third-party apps, enabling a tailored tech stack for your hotel.
AsyaSoft has no listed verified integrations, likely limiting its ability to connect with other essential hotel systems. For hotels seeking a connected, scalable ecosystem, Mews’s extensive integrations are a decisive advantage. Edge: Mews.
With over 750 reviews, Mews’s hotelier ratings—4.62/5 overall—are both recent and consistent. Hotels across segments, from boutique to large chains, praise its ease of use, support, and feature set.
AsyaSoft’s rating is nonexistent, and there are no recent reviews or property ratings to consider. The Mews user base’s positive feedback underscores its reliability for modern hotels. Edge: Mews.
AsyaSoft does not publicly disclose pricing, which suggests a bespoke or limited model, possibly with high customization costs. Mews charges a base fee of $900/month, with no implementation or setup fees, providing a transparent, predictable cost structure.
Without clear pricing for AsyaSoft, it’s difficult to compare value directly. However, Mews’s known pricing aligns with its comprehensive features and global support, making it a worthwhile investment for scalable growth. Edge: Mews.
Not ideal if your hotel aims for expansion, automation, or integration with third-party tools. AsyaSoft’s limited features and lack of recent reviews make it less suitable for modern, growth-oriented operations.
Not ideal if your property is very small, with minimal operational complexity, or if you prefer a legacy system with limited support. Mews’s broad capabilities and recent positive reviews suit ambitious hotels aiming for operational excellence.
Mews offers a modern, feature-rich platform supported by a large, active user base and recent reviews. Its cloud-native design supports automation, integrations, and scalability—crucial for hotels wanting to grow efficiently.
Choose Mews if your hotel needs advanced tools, international support, and a system that evolves with hospitality technology. If your operation is tiny, local, and needs only basic management, AsyaSoft might suffice, though its lack of recent reviews signals caution.
For most growing or modern hotels, Mews stands out as the more reliable, scalable, and feature-packed choice. It’s the platform designed to meet the demands of today’s hospitality industry—and tomorrow’s.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。AsyaSoft PMS 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。AsyaSoft PMS 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 335 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
AsyaSoft PMS:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。AsyaSoft 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问