The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #44 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #25 24 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #19 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #24 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #28 24 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #23 26 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #29 8 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #31 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #22 20 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #24 17 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #28 1 条评价 |
When evaluating property management systems (PMS) for your hotel, your primary concern is which platform best aligns with your operational needs, budget, and growth ambitions. Athena by Athena and Infor HMS target similar pain points—streamlining reservations, optimizing revenue, and improving guest service—but they diverge significantly in maturity, features, and market presence. Athena's lack of reviews and ratings makes it difficult to gauge true user satisfaction, whereas Infor HMS's robust review set and recent feedback provide a clearer picture. Which solution will deliver the most value for your property?
Both systems aim to improve daily operations, but Infor HMS has a more established presence through its extensive feature set and larger user base. Athena appears more limited in scope, with no recent reviews or measurable ratings, raising questions about its current viability. Do you prioritize proven performance and support, or are you willing to pioneer a less-tested platform?
Athena and Infor HMS are designed to address core hotel management challenges, such as reservations, housekeeping, and revenue optimization. Athena’s AI-powered revenue management system promises to enhance profitability through advanced algorithms, but without recent user feedback, it's uncertain how well it performs in live environments. In contrast, Infor HMS leverages its 46 reviews—mostly recent—to demonstrate solid functionality, including automation, reporting, and integrations.
While Athena claims comprehensive AI capabilities, its lack of reviews means you cannot verify user experiences or real-world results. Conversely, Infor's reviews highlight its ability to streamline operations with features like a housekeeping module, guest profiles, and automated night audits. The absence of shared features suggests Athena's offering may be less mature or lacking compared to Infor. Does this make Infor a safer choice based on proven user satisfaction?
Edge: Infor HMS.
If your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich PMS with proven integration capabilities and a broad market reach, go with Infor HMS. It's especially suitable for properties seeking automation, reporting, and multi-lingual support across multiple regions—its presence in 13 countries and support for diverse hotel segments makes it versatile.
If, however, your team is exploring a system with AI-driven revenue management and is willing to accept limited validation, Athena might appeal—though its lack of recent reviews is a concern. For most hotels looking for a dependable, scalable solution, Infor’s track record and feature set provide a clear advantage.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS scores a 3.88/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive navigation and short onboarding process. Support responsiveness and detailed training options have been positively mentioned, despite some complaints about user interface aesthetics.
Athena, with a 0/5 ease of use rating and no recent reviews, offers no user feedback to assess its UI or onboarding processes. Its limited visibility makes it impossible to judge how quickly your staff could adopt the platform or whether it would require substantial training.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS boasts 20 exclusive features, including a housekeeping module, online support, guest profiles, calendar view, direct billing, multi-currency support, revenue management, and automated night audit. These features are critical for automating daily operations and improving guest experiences.
Athena offers no unique features listed, and its overall capabilities remain unclear due to a lack of reviews. Given Infor's extensive functionality and ongoing updates, it clearly provides more comprehensive tools for hotel management.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS is rated 4.04/5 for customer support, with reviews highlighting prompt, professional responses and helpful guidance during onboarding and troubleshooting. Support responsiveness is a significant advantage, particularly for larger properties with complex needs.
Athena offers no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess support quality. Its absence of feedback implies a lack of proven support services, which could be risky during critical operational issues.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS integrates with over 113 verified partners, including major booking platforms like Booking.com, Expedia, and HRS. This extensive list facilitates automated data flow, reducing manual workload and errors.
Athena has no verified integrations listed, suggesting it may lack the connectivity essential for modern hotel operations. For properties reliant on third-party systems, Infor’s broad ecosystem is a clear advantage.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS’s 46 reviews provide a more current and detailed perspective, with an overall rating of 4.04/5 and a Net Promoter Score of 7.15/5. Hotels across various segments—particularly independent, boutique, and city center properties—appreciate its operational efficiency and support.
Athena’s absence of reviews and ratings makes it impossible to determine user satisfaction. Its lack of recent feedback means you should be cautious about investing without more performance data.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Both Athena and Infor do not publicly disclose pricing, which is typical for enterprise solutions. Expect that Infor's pricing is tailored based on hotel size and features, potentially making it more accessible for larger operations. Athena's cost structure remains uncertain due to a lack of information but likely involves bespoke quotes.
This pricing opacity means you should engage vendors directly for quotes aligned with your property’s scale and needs.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in their maturity and proven performance. Infor HMS features a broad suite of tools, integrations, and recent positive reviews, making it a reliable choice for most hotels looking to optimize daily operations and revenue.
Choose Athena if your hotel is experimenting with AI-driven revenue management and is prepared to take a risk on a less-established platform. However, the absence of recent reviews and measurable ratings suggests it’s a less certain investment.
For properties prioritizing stability, support, and proven features, Infor HMS is the clear winner. Its extensive ecosystem and current user feedback give you confidence that your investment will translate into operational improvements and guest satisfaction.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Athena 和 Infor HMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Athena 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Infor HMS 提供 113 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Infor HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 3.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Athena:否。Infor HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Athena 的 HT Score 为 0,Infor 的为 22。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问