Athena vs. Mews PMS: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 15, 2026  ·  已分析 887 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 887 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Athena 表现出色 .

Mews 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Guest CRM.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Athena 与 Mews PMS 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 887 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
0
100
推荐可能性
0%
93%
易用性
0.0/5
4.7/5
客户支持
0.0/5
4.3/5
性价比
0.0/5
4.4/5
起始价格 Contact sales From $900/mo
经验证的评价 0 887

Athena 与 Mews PMS 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 887 条经验证的评价后,Athena 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Athena Mews Mews
优点
+ Ease of Use
+ Automation and Integrations
+ Customizability and Flexibility
+ 入职和支持
缺点
Billing and Invoicing
报告和分析
Multi-Property Management

Athena 对比 Mews:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Athena Mews Mews
小型(10-24 间客房) #3 329 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #1 397 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #3 45 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #3 49 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Athena Mews Mews
精品酒店 #1 483 条评价
豪华酒店 #5 220 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #2 170 条评价
长住酒店 #1 130 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Athena Mews Mews
北美 #8 106 条评价
欧洲 #1 660 条评价
亚太 #10 17 条评价
中东 #28 8 条评价

The Decision

Choosing a property management system (PMS) can feel overwhelming, especially when evaluating two leading options like Athena by Athena and Mews PMS by Mews. Both aim to streamline hotel operations, but they diverge significantly in capabilities, user experience, and market presence. Your team needs a solution that not only solves your immediate operational challenges but also scales with your hotel’s growth.

Given the recent reviews and the sheer volume of user feedback, Mews PMS stands out as the more proven and well-supported platform. Are you ready to prioritize a system with extensive real-world validation?

Is Athena or Mews Better for Hotels?

Athena by Athena offers a broad AI-powered revenue management tool, designed to optimize pricing and profitability through advanced algorithms. However, with no recent reviews or ratings, its effectiveness and user satisfaction remain uncertain compared to Mews.

Mews PMS, on the other hand, has over 750 reviews in the past six months alone, with a 4.62-star rating and a 93% likelihood to recommend. Its ease of use, customer support, and feature richness are consistently praised. Does your hotel need a system backed by recent, high-volume user feedback?

Mews PMS vs Athena: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a flexible, highly integrated PMS that supports automation, extensive third-party integrations, and a scalable cloud platform, go with Mews. Its broad feature set (over 59 unique functionalities) and proven track record make it ideal for mid-sized to large hotels, boutique properties, and multi-property groups.

If your team is focused solely on revenue automation and AI-driven pricing without a need for extensive integrations or operational automation, Athena might seem appealing. But, with no recent reviews or active user base, it’s a riskier choice for hotels seeking reliable, ongoing support and proven functionality.

Is Athena or Mews Easier to Use?

Mews boasts a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating based on recent reviews, with users praising its modern, intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Many hotel staff mention that even non-technical users find it simple to navigate, with quick setup and minimal training required.

Athena, however, has no recent review data or user feedback available, leaving its usability and onboarding experience uncertain. Without recent user validation, it’s difficult to recommend Athena as the easier system to adopt.

Edge: Mews.

Which Has Better Features: Athena or Mews?

Mews offers a comprehensive set of over 59 features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management modules, booking engine, guest CRM, mobile check-in, integrated POS, automation tools, and advanced reporting. Many features that are essential for modern hotels are included, with continuous updates driven by user feedback.

Athena provides no documented features or third-party integrations, focusing mainly on AI-powered revenue management. Its lack of detailed functionality and recent feature rollout data makes it difficult to compare directly, but clearly, Mews has a more complete and versatile feature set.

Edge: Mews.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Athena or Mews?

Mews consistently receives high marks for customer support, with a 4.27/5 rating and recent reviews praising its quick responsiveness and proactive onboarding. Clients mention that the support team is helpful, with 24/7 availability and effective problem resolution.

Athena has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess support quality. Given Mews’s strong recent support reputation, it’s the safer choice for hotel teams that prioritize reliable assistance.

Edge: Mews.

Which Has More Integrations: Athena or Mews?

Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including popular channels, POS systems, revenue tools, and more. Its open API and extensive marketplace empower hotels to customize their tech ecosystem with over 1,000 available third-party apps.

Athena has no verified partners or integrations listed. For hotels that rely on a connected tech stack, Mews’s robust ecosystem provides a clear advantage.

Edge: Mews.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Athena or Mews?

Mews’s recent ratings reflect a 4.62/5 overall score from 758 reviews, with the most recent feedback highlighting its ease of use, support, and feature depth. Hotel segments such as boutique hotels, independents, and city-center properties all rate Mews highly, with many reviews emphasizing operational efficiency and guest experience improvements.

Athena’s ratings are nonexistent, but the lack of recent reviews indicates minimal current user engagement. For hoteliers seeking validated, current user satisfaction, Mews dominates.

Edge: Mews.

How Much Do Athena and Mews Cost?

Mews costs $900 monthly as a base price, with no freemium or tiered pricing detailed. Athena’s pricing is not publicly available, making it difficult to compare value directly.

Given Mews’s transparent pricing and proven ROI through customer feedback, it offers better cost clarity and perceived value. Athena’s unclear cost structure adds risk to your decision-making.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Athena?

  • Hotels seeking AI-driven revenue management without extensive operational needs.
  • Properties aiming to optimize pricing through automation, especially if they have a smaller or less complex operation.
  • Teams comfortable with untested or less documented platforms.

Not ideal if:

  • Your hotel requires a full-featured PMS with integrations.
  • You manage multiple properties or need centralized operations.
  • You prefer a platform with proven support and recent user feedback.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Mews?

  • Hotels of all sizes seeking an integrated, cloud-native PMS.
  • Properties that value automation, extensive third-party integrations, and real-time data.
  • Hotel groups managing multiple locations needing centralized controls.
  • Teams prioritizing ease of use, support, and ongoing platform innovation.

Not ideal if:

  • Your hotel is very small or only needs a simple, standalone booking platform.
  • You’re looking for a system without a substantial investment in integrations or automation.
  • You prefer a vendor with limited market presence or fewer recent reviews.

Mews vs Athena: The Bottom Line for Hotels

Mews is a well-established, highly-rated platform with a proven track record evidenced by over 750 recent reviews. Its comprehensive feature set, extensive integrations, and responsive support make it a safe choice for modern hotels aiming for operational excellence and growth.

Athena offers an AI-powered revenue management focus but lacks recent validation, user feedback, and a broad ecosystem. Its limited information and unproven market presence suggest it’s best suited for niche revenue optimization rather than full hotel management.

If you need a reliable, scalable PMS with current market validation, go with Mews. If your core concern is AI-driven pricing and you’re comfortable with untested platforms, Athena might be worth exploring—but be aware of the risks.

In conclusion, for most hotels today, Mews offers a more comprehensive, validated, and supported solution.

Athena 和 Mews PMS 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Athena Mews Mews
Starting Price From $900/mo

Athena 有哪些 Mews PMS 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Athena 和 Mews PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Athena Mews Mews
多币种
多种语言
客人资料
客户关系管理
收益管理模块
预订引擎

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 47 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:Athena 对比 Mews(按业务目标)

我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本
Athena

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Mews Episode Tbilisi 小型
+ Zero connection fee costs
+ 11.9% booking engine conversion rate (average for independent hotels is 3.3%)
+ 9% higher ADR for direct bookings compared to OTAs

"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."

Nikoloz Cherkezishvili
Nikoloz Cherkezishvili
Co-Founder & CEO, Episode Hotels
提高运营效率
Athena

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Mews Aplend Apartments 中型
+ Five properties went live in the space of two weeks
+ One week from welcome call to go live date for several resorts
+ 80% faster to train new staff, cutting time from five working days to just one

"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."

Matej Matejka
Matej Matejka
Owner, Aplend Group
改善宾客体验
Athena

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Mews Leven Manchester 小型
+ 33% of guests use online check-in
+ 9% higher ADR for guests who use online check-in
+ Up to an hour saved per day for the front desk team

"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."

Kris Doyle
Kris Doyle
General Manager, Leven Manchester

Athena 对比 Mews:总结

Athena
0.0/5 来自 0 条评价
0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 0 个集成
查看资料
Mews
Mews
4.7/5 来自 887 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

Ease of Use 89% 正面

Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.

Automation and Integrations 69% 正面

Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.

Customizability and Flexibility 69% 正面

Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

Billing and Invoicing 77% 负面

Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.

报告和分析 60% 负面

虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。

独特功能

多种语言 多币种 收益管理模块 预订引擎 客户关系管理
4.7/5 易用性 4.3/5 客户支持 335 个集成
访问官网

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Mews 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
易用性 Mews 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)
客户支持 Mews 4.3 vs 0.0 (+4.3)
性价比 Mews 4.4 vs 0.0 (+4.4)
入职培训 Mews 4.4 vs 0.0 (+4.4)

关于 Athena 与 Mews PMS 的常见问题

Athena 能否替代 Mews PMS?

这取决于您的需求。Athena 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Athena 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 335 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Athena 或 Mews PMS 是否提供免费方案?

Athena:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Athena 和 Mews PMS?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Athena 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息