The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,215 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Clock 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Gift Vouchers & Prepaid Experiences.
Mews 表现出色 在 ease of use 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest CRM and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
在分析了 1,215 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 ease of use and intuitive design, 预订和客房管理, 集成与自动化,而 Mews 用户则强调 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Intuitive Design
▾
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
+
预订和客房管理
▾
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
+
集成与自动化
▾
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
+
培训和入职
▾
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
功能更新和可用性
▾
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
−
连接性和同步性
▾
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
−
费率管理灵活性
▾
|
−
客房管理
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 117 条评价 | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 157 条评价 | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 9 条评价 | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 5 条评价 | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 165 条评价 | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 80 条评价 | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 62 条评价 | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #9 27 条评价 | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 30 条评价 | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 228 条评价 | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 13 条评价 | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #17 2 条评价 | #28 8 条评价 |
Choosing between Clock PMS by Clock and Mews PMS by Mews hinges on your hotel’s operational needs, scale, and strategic goals. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but their core strengths and user feedback diverge significantly, especially considering recent reviews and user ratings. Your decision should be driven by which product aligns best with your hotel’s size, complexity, and future growth plans.
Clock offers a comprehensive all-in-one platform with a strong focus on usability for independent and boutique hotels, while Mews boasts a higher review volume, more recent feedback, and a broader ecosystem of integrations. Which of these features will serve your hotel better as you look to enhance efficiency and guest experience?
Both Clock and Mews solve core property management challenges: reservations, rates, invoicing, front desk, and guest communication. Clock excels in delivering an integrated suite tailored to boutique and small hotels, with features like online check-in, activity bookings, and restaurant POS, all included without additional costs.
Mews, in contrast, is often highlighted for its extensive third-party integrations, over 1,000 in its marketplace, and advanced automation capabilities. Recent reviews emphasize Mews’s high customer satisfaction score and large review base—more than three times Clock’s—and its rapid support response, making it a preferred choice for hotels seeking scalability. Are you prioritizing an all-in-one system or a flexible, integrative platform?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, fully integrated PMS with features like online booking, restaurant POS, and no extra charges for integrations, Clock is the logical pick. Its strong reputation among boutique hotels, especially those in Europe and North America, and high user ratings (4.8/5 from 251 reviews, with recent feedback indicating continued satisfaction) make it an attractive option.
Conversely, if your hotel values a highly scalable, adaptable platform with extensive third-party integrations, robust automation, and a proven track record supported by over 750 reviews (average 4.62/5), Mews is the clear leader. It’s especially suitable for multi-property portfolios, as reflected in the positive reviews from large hotel groups. Do you need a tried-and-true platform or a flexible ecosystem for growth?
Clock’s user interface scores a 4.78/5, with many reviews praising its ease of training and quick onboarding, especially for small teams and independent hotels. Users often describe Clock as intuitive, making staff adoption rapid, and its features straightforward for daily use.
Mews’s UI scores slightly lower at 4.7/5, yet the platform receives overwhelmingly positive recent feedback for its modern design, ease of navigation, and rapid onboarding for large and small hotels alike. User quotes emphasize how quickly new staff can get up to speed, and the recent surge in reviews (98 in the last 6 months) adds confidence in its current usability. Edge: Clock.
Clock offers 57 shared features plus two unique, hotel-specific functionalities: gift vouchers and prepaid experiences. It includes automation of reservations, rates, invoicing, guest messaging, and even restaurant POS, with no feature restrictions.
Mews, on the other hand, provides a broader feature set—over 57 shared features plus two exclusive ones: Guest CRM and guest communication via SMS—plus a marketplace with over 1,000 integrations, enabling extensive customization. Recent reviews highlight Mews’s advanced automation, contactless check-in, and revenue management tools as key benefits. Edge: Mews.
Clock’s support scores a 4.75/5, with many reviews lauding its responsiveness and proactive support team, especially for onboarding and troubleshooting. Users frequently mention how the support team resolves issues efficiently and supports ongoing improvements.
Mews’s support scores 4.27/5, with some recent feedback noting occasional bugs and slower response times. However, many users acknowledge that the team is responsive and dedicated to fixing issues swiftly, with recent reviews indicating improvements. Edge: Clock.
Clock integrates with 111 verified partners, including key systems like channel managers and revenue tools. Its integration approach is straightforward, with no connection fees, but its ecosystem is smaller compared to Mews.
Mews hosts over 336 verified partners, with 103 shared integrations with Clock, and a marketplace of over 1,000 solutions. Its open API and extensive ecosystem support diverse tech stacks, making it especially attractive for hotels with complex or evolving needs. Edge: Mews.
Clock’s reviews, with a total of 251, are mostly from boutique and independent hotels, rating it an average of 4.8/5, with top hotel segments like boutique hotels (4.83/5) and city center hotels (4.84/5) expressing high satisfaction. Recent reviews confirm continued positive sentiment.
Mews, with over 750 reviews and an average of 4.62/5, garners high marks from a wide range of properties, including large groups and tech-savvy hotels. Its recent review count (98 in last 6 months) and a higher overall rating (99.5/100 HTR Score) demonstrate its popularity and trustworthiness. Edge: Mews.
Clock’s base price is $600 per month, with no trial or freemium options, offering a predictable, flat fee. Mews’s pricing starts at $900 per month, also without trial options, reflecting its broader ecosystem and advanced features.
While pricing differences are clear, the value depends on your hotel’s needs. Clock’s affordability may appeal for smaller hotels seeking core functionalities, whereas Mews’s higher price point aligns with its extensive integrations and automation capabilities.
Clock PMS is a highly capable, all-in-one solution with a strong reputation among boutique and independent hotels. Its focus on simplicity, service, and included features makes it ideal for hotels that want a reliable, straightforward system without extra costs for integrations.
Mews PMS stands out for its extensive integrations, automation, and scalability, making it a better fit for growing hotel portfolios and tech-driven properties. Its recent review volume, higher overall score, and marketplace make it the smarter choice for hotels aiming to modernize and expand.
If your hotel needs a simple, all-in-one system with excellent support, Clock is a solid choice. If you require flexibility, advanced automation, and a broad ecosystem, Mews offers a superior platform that adapts to your future growth.
Edge: Mews.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 14 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many users are impressed with Clock PMS+ for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, which simplifies the training process for new employees... Many users are impressed with Clock PMS+ for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, which simplifies the training process for new employees and enhances operational efficiency. The software's straightforward navigation and learnability make it ideal for fast-paced environments.
评论者经常提到,Clock PMS+ 提供了高效的预订和客房管理工具。它将预订、客房管理和宾客沟通等各种运营环节整合到一个平台上,从而节省时间并减少错误。
用户非常欣赏 Clock PMS+ 的广泛集成和自动化功能,它可以与其他系统无缝连接,节省重复性任务的时间,并增强日常运营。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论者表示,他们在适应新功能更新方面遇到了一些挑战,他们认为,虽然这些改进是有益的,但有时会影响用户体验。因此,他们呼吁制定更平滑的过渡流程来更好... 一些评论者表示,他们在适应新功能更新方面遇到了一些挑战,他们认为,虽然这些改进是有益的,但有时会影响用户体验。因此,他们呼吁制定更平滑的过渡流程来更好地适应这些更新。
一些用户指出,虽然 Clock PMS+ 提供了全面的报告,但在数据收集和呈现方式方面仍有改进的空间,这可以增强收入管理和战略规划。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock PMS 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock PMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 335 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock PMS:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 88,Mews 的为 99。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案