The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,215 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Clock 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Gift Vouchers & Prepaid Experiences.
Mews 表现出色 在 ease of use 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest CRM and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
在分析了 1,215 条经验证的评价后,Clock 用户最看重其 功能丰富, 运营效率, 响应式支持和定期更新,而 Mews 用户则强调 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
功能丰富
▾
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
+
响应式支持和定期更新
▾
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
+
易于培训使用
▾
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误消息
▾
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
−
报告功能
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 117 条评价 | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 157 条评价 | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #17 9 条评价 | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #11 5 条评价 | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 165 条评价 | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 80 条评价 | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #8 62 条评价 | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #9 27 条评价 | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #17 30 条评价 | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 228 条评价 | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 13 条评价 | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #17 2 条评价 | #28 8 条评价 |
Choosing between Clock PMS by Clock and Mews PMS by Mews hinges on your hotel’s operational needs, scale, and strategic goals. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but their core strengths and user feedback diverge significantly, especially considering recent reviews and user ratings. Your decision should be driven by which product aligns best with your hotel’s size, complexity, and future growth plans.
Clock offers a comprehensive all-in-one platform with a strong focus on usability for independent and boutique hotels, while Mews boasts a higher review volume, more recent feedback, and a broader ecosystem of integrations. Which of these features will serve your hotel better as you look to enhance efficiency and guest experience?
Both Clock and Mews solve core property management challenges: reservations, rates, invoicing, front desk, and guest communication. Clock excels in delivering an integrated suite tailored to boutique and small hotels, with features like online check-in, activity bookings, and restaurant POS, all included without additional costs.
Mews, in contrast, is often highlighted for its extensive third-party integrations, over 1,000 in its marketplace, and advanced automation capabilities. Recent reviews emphasize Mews’s high customer satisfaction score and large review base—more than three times Clock’s—and its rapid support response, making it a preferred choice for hotels seeking scalability. Are you prioritizing an all-in-one system or a flexible, integrative platform?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, fully integrated PMS with features like online booking, restaurant POS, and no extra charges for integrations, Clock is the logical pick. Its strong reputation among boutique hotels, especially those in Europe and North America, and high user ratings (4.8/5 from 251 reviews, with recent feedback indicating continued satisfaction) make it an attractive option.
Conversely, if your hotel values a highly scalable, adaptable platform with extensive third-party integrations, robust automation, and a proven track record supported by over 750 reviews (average 4.62/5), Mews is the clear leader. It’s especially suitable for multi-property portfolios, as reflected in the positive reviews from large hotel groups. Do you need a tried-and-true platform or a flexible ecosystem for growth?
Clock’s user interface scores a 4.78/5, with many reviews praising its ease of training and quick onboarding, especially for small teams and independent hotels. Users often describe Clock as intuitive, making staff adoption rapid, and its features straightforward for daily use.
Mews’s UI scores slightly lower at 4.7/5, yet the platform receives overwhelmingly positive recent feedback for its modern design, ease of navigation, and rapid onboarding for large and small hotels alike. User quotes emphasize how quickly new staff can get up to speed, and the recent surge in reviews (98 in the last 6 months) adds confidence in its current usability. Edge: Clock.
Clock offers 57 shared features plus two unique, hotel-specific functionalities: gift vouchers and prepaid experiences. It includes automation of reservations, rates, invoicing, guest messaging, and even restaurant POS, with no feature restrictions.
Mews, on the other hand, provides a broader feature set—over 57 shared features plus two exclusive ones: Guest CRM and guest communication via SMS—plus a marketplace with over 1,000 integrations, enabling extensive customization. Recent reviews highlight Mews’s advanced automation, contactless check-in, and revenue management tools as key benefits. Edge: Mews.
Clock’s support scores a 4.75/5, with many reviews lauding its responsiveness and proactive support team, especially for onboarding and troubleshooting. Users frequently mention how the support team resolves issues efficiently and supports ongoing improvements.
Mews’s support scores 4.27/5, with some recent feedback noting occasional bugs and slower response times. However, many users acknowledge that the team is responsive and dedicated to fixing issues swiftly, with recent reviews indicating improvements. Edge: Clock.
Clock integrates with 111 verified partners, including key systems like channel managers and revenue tools. Its integration approach is straightforward, with no connection fees, but its ecosystem is smaller compared to Mews.
Mews hosts over 336 verified partners, with 103 shared integrations with Clock, and a marketplace of over 1,000 solutions. Its open API and extensive ecosystem support diverse tech stacks, making it especially attractive for hotels with complex or evolving needs. Edge: Mews.
Clock’s reviews, with a total of 251, are mostly from boutique and independent hotels, rating it an average of 4.8/5, with top hotel segments like boutique hotels (4.83/5) and city center hotels (4.84/5) expressing high satisfaction. Recent reviews confirm continued positive sentiment.
Mews, with over 750 reviews and an average of 4.62/5, garners high marks from a wide range of properties, including large groups and tech-savvy hotels. Its recent review count (98 in last 6 months) and a higher overall rating (99.5/100 HTR Score) demonstrate its popularity and trustworthiness. Edge: Mews.
Clock’s base price is $600 per month, with no trial or freemium options, offering a predictable, flat fee. Mews’s pricing starts at $900 per month, also without trial options, reflecting its broader ecosystem and advanced features.
While pricing differences are clear, the value depends on your hotel’s needs. Clock’s affordability may appeal for smaller hotels seeking core functionalities, whereas Mews’s higher price point aligns with its extensive integrations and automation capabilities.
Clock PMS is a highly capable, all-in-one solution with a strong reputation among boutique and independent hotels. Its focus on simplicity, service, and included features makes it ideal for hotels that want a reliable, straightforward system without extra costs for integrations.
Mews PMS stands out for its extensive integrations, automation, and scalability, making it a better fit for growing hotel portfolios and tech-driven properties. Its recent review volume, higher overall score, and marketplace make it the smarter choice for hotels aiming to modernize and expand.
If your hotel needs a simple, all-in-one system with excellent support, Clock is a solid choice. If you require flexibility, advanced automation, and a broad ecosystem, Mews offers a superior platform that adapts to your future growth.
Edge: Mews.
我们分析了 14 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Clock PMS+ 提供丰富的功能,有助于管理酒店运营和活动。然而,一些用户发现功能繁多,难以管理,建议改进其组织方式。
该软件通过节省时间并简化部门之间的沟通和协调,显著提高了运营效率,为员工和客人带来更顺畅的体验。
用户对响应式支持服务和定期更新表示赞赏,这些更新引入了新功能和改进,确保了系统的可靠性和与用户需求的相关性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户偶尔会遇到以代码形式显示的错误消息,这让他们难以快速解决问题。直接从错误消息导航到问题可以提升用户体验。
报告功能虽然全面,但速度较慢,限制了其目前的有效性。用户建议进行优化,以解锁更多强大的功能。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Clock PMS 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Clock PMS 提供 111 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 335 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Clock PMS:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Clock 的 HT Score 为 84,Mews 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问