The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 1,257 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Mews 表现出色 在 ease of use 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Stayntouch 表现出色 在 customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) .
基于 HTR 上 1,257 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $900/mo | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 887 | 370 |
在分析了 1,257 条经验证的评价后,Mews 用户最看重其 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 整合与入职, 系统性能和可靠性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
+
整合与入职
▾
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
+
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
−
客房管理和客房服务
▾
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
|
−
客房管理
▾
|
−
费率和收益管理
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #3 329 条评价 | #18 51 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 397 条评价 | #5 208 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 45 条评价 | #7 29 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #3 49 条评价 | #2 58 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 483 条评价 | #6 220 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 220 条评价 | #6 180 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 170 条评价 | #3 152 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #1 130 条评价 | #14 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #8 106 条评价 | #4 262 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 660 条评价 | #12 64 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #10 17 条评价 | #21 3 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #28 8 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest experience, and future growth. Mews PMS and Stayntouch are both cloud-based platforms designed to streamline hotel management, but their core strengths and weaknesses differ. While Mews boasts a larger user base and more recent reviews, Stayntouch emphasizes intuitive design and a wide array of integrations. Do you want a more established platform with extensive features or a user-friendly system focused on simplicity and scalability?
Mews and Stayntouch both aim to automate daily hotel operations, from reservations to billing, but they approach this differently. Mews offers a broad ecosystem with over 1,000 integrations, making it highly adaptable for varied hotel types, especially boutique and independent hotels. Stayntouch focuses on providing a streamlined, mobile-friendly interface with seamless multi-property management, appealing for chains and larger portfolios. Which particular operational challenges are most critical for your hotel?
Mews’s higher HTScore (99.53) and more recent reviews—98 in the last six months—indicate a more active, engaged user community and continuous platform improvements. Stayntouch’s slightly lower scores and fewer recent reviews suggest a more mature but less rapidly evolving product. Are you looking for a platform that evolves quickly or one with proven stability?
Finally, while Mews is praised for its open API and extensive marketplace, Stayntouch highlights its user-friendly screens and mobile-focused design. Your decision should consider whether flexibility and automation or ease of use and simplicity matter most for your team.
If your hotel requires a flexible, feature-rich system with vast integration options for diverse operations, Mews is the clear choice. Its substantial review count (758 reviews, with recent activity) and high ratings support its reputation among boutique hotels, hostels, and small chains seeking automation and scalability.
Conversely, if your hotel values ease of use, swift onboarding, and strong multi-property management, Stayntouch is better suited. Its 317 reviews—though fewer and with less recent activity—highlight its popularity among larger chains and properties prioritizing mobile access and straightforward management.
Hotels that need a highly customizable, rapidly evolving PMS with extensive third-party integrations should lean toward Mews. On the other hand, properties prioritizing simplicity, mobile-friendly interfaces, and effective multi-property oversight are better served by Stayntouch.
Mews’s UI has a modern, intuitive interface rated 4.7/5, praised for its ease of implementation, especially in boutique and independent hotels. Support for onboarding is rated 4.39/5, with many users citing straightforward setup and helpful training, though some mention initial bugs.
Stayntouch also scores 4.7/5 for ease of use, with users emphasizing its friendly, mobile-centric design and quick learning curve. Support and onboarding are rated slightly higher at 4.58/5, reflecting a focus on smooth implementation and ongoing assistance.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Mews offers 59 features, including unique capabilities like multi-lingual support, guest CRM, employee messaging, and native email marketing—features not available in Stayntouch. Its advanced automation tools help streamline billing, revenue management, and task management.
Stayntouch provides core PMS features with a focus on reservation management, housekeeping, and multi-property oversight, but it does not match Mews’s breadth of add-ons or third-party marketplace. Its platform’s simplicity is its advantage, but it lacks the extensive customization options that Mews offers.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support scores 4.27/5, with customers noting occasional bugs but appreciating quick resolution and proactive support. Some review quotes include: “The support team sets new standards,” and “They’re generally responsive and helpful.”
Stayntouch surpasses in support with a rating of 4.68/5, with users praising its detailed onboarding, prompt assistance, and dedicated staff. Comments like “Support is excellent, and onboarding is smooth” are common.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Mews boasts 336 verified partners, including critical integrations like Criton, Orange Hotel Marketing, and Right Revenue, alongside common channel managers and revenue systems. Its extensive marketplace allows for tailored, multi-system ecosystems.
Stayntouch has 188 verified integrations, including popular third-party tools such as STAAH and RoomPriceGenie. Its integrations are robust but fewer than Mews, potentially limiting flexibility for highly customized setups.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s overall rating of 4.62/5 is supported by 758 reviews, with recent user feedback highlighting its reliability, automation, and innovation. Independent and boutique hotels, in particular, rate Mews highly, with some review quotes praising its adaptability: “It’s the best PMS I’ve used.”
Stayntouch’s 4.56/5 rating, based on 317 reviews, enjoys high praise from chains and larger properties, especially for its user-friendly interface. Recent reviews emphasize seamless onboarding and staff productivity boosts.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s base price is $900 per month, with no mention of hidden fees or implementation charges. Stayntouch’s base price is slightly lower at $800 per month, also without setup or implementation fees. Precise costs may vary based on property size and specific needs.
Mews excels when your hotel needs a highly adaptable, feature-rich platform that supports extensive integrations and automation. Its larger review base and recent activity demonstrate ongoing innovation and broad adoption, especially among boutique hotels, hostels, and small chains.
Stayntouch is best suited for properties seeking a straightforward, mobile-friendly system that simplifies multi-property management without sacrificing ease of use. Its high support ratings and user-centric design make it ideal for larger chains or properties emphasizing guest digital experiences.
If you value a platform with the most recent reviews, widespread adoption, and advanced integrations, Mews is the clear choice. If ease of use, smooth onboarding, and strong multi-property features matter more, Stayntouch will serve you well.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Mews PMS 和 Stayntouch 共享 49 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 客户关系管理 |
我们分析了 13 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该系统直观的设计便于操作,非常适合快速培训新员工。其醒目的视觉和组织元素有助于加快任务执行速度,提升员工能力,从而改善与顾客的互动体验。
Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设... Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设置方面。
Stayntouch 的服务总体可靠,很少出现重大故障,并通过云端提供持续支持。尽管总体评价良好,但一些用户也对公司快速发展背景下解决复杂问题的速度表示担忧。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然用户普遍称赞其易于访问且支持运营的报告,但他们也指出需要更具适应性的报告功能。一些报告缺乏细节或难以操作,凸显了可定制分析解决方案的必要性。
客房分配和客房服务功能因提升运营效率而获得积极反馈。然而,用户希望客房日志查看和任务安排功能能够得到改进,以满足特定的管理需求。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Mews PMS 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Mews PMS 提供 335 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch 提供 187 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Mews PMS:否。Stayntouch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Mews 的 HT Score 为 100,Stayntouch 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问