The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 211 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
AutoClerk, Inc. 表现出色 .
eviivo 表现出色 在 响应式客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 Vacation Rentals & Villas 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.
基于 HTR 上 211 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $700/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 3 | 208 |
在分析了 211 条经验证的评价后,AutoClerk, Inc. 用户最看重其 ,而 eviivo 用户则强调 响应式客户支持, 入职专业知识, 技术效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
响应式客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
入职专业知识
▾
|
|
|
+
技术效率
▾
|
|
|
+
预订和预约效率
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
改进建议
▾
|
|
|
−
定制和功能开发
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #15 54 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #60 1 条评价 | #23 23 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #54 0 条评价 | #20 8 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #18 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #72 1 条评价 | #19 41 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #67 0 条评价 | #16 38 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #64 0 条评价 | #19 21 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #10 18 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #57 1 条评价 | #15 39 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #6 142 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #33 2 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #29 1 条评价 |
Choosing between AutoClerk (PMS) by AutoClerk, Inc. and eviivo Suite™ PMS hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and operational needs. Both products aim to streamline property management, but they diverge significantly in scope, user experience, and market presence. AutoClerk appeals to smaller properties seeking fundamental tools, while eviivo offers a broad suite for diverse hospitality providers, especially those prioritizing reservations and guest communication. Are you prioritizing simplicity or an all-in-one platform?
AutoClerk and eviivo both serve property managers, but they tackle different hospitality segments. AutoClerk primarily targets independent hotels and small chains with straightforward operations, focusing on core PMS functions. In contrast, eviivo caters to a range of property types—from B&Bs to vacation rentals—with a feature-rich platform that integrates booking engines, channel management, and guest communication tools. Given the stark difference in review volume and recency, eviivo’s more recent and plentiful feedback indicates a more active user base.
AutoClerk’s reviews emphasize ease of learning and support, but mention limited reporting and data manipulation. Conversely, eviivo’s reviews highlight automation, channel integration, and strong support, despite some concerns about customization. With more recent reviews (20 in last 6 months) and a 95% likelihood to recommend, eviivo outperforms AutoClerk’s sparse and older feedback. Do you need a simple system or a comprehensive management ecosystem?
If your hotel requires a straightforward PMS with easy onboarding, limited reporting, and basic guest management, AutoClerk is suitable. It fits small properties seeking a cloud-based system with reliable support, especially if your team prioritizes user-friendliness and support responsiveness.
If you need a multi-feature platform with channel management, online booking, revenue tools, guest communication, and automation, eviivo is the clear choice. For properties managing multiple listings, B&Bs, or vacation rentals looking to expand operations and improve guest interactions, eviivo offers a broader suite of tools and stronger market presence.
Your decision should hinge on your property type, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Do you want a simple, reliable system or an expansive platform with automation and integrations?
AutoClerk’s user reviews rate its ease of use at 4.33/5, with many praising its intuitive design and quick learning curve. Support services are highly rated at 4.33/5, and users find onboarding straightforward, though some suggest the interface could be improved.
eviivo’s ease of use scores slightly higher at 4.43/5, with recent reviews emphasizing its user-friendly booking management and automation features. Support is also highly rated at 4.42/5, with users highlighting quick onboarding and helpful customer service, especially for small operators and B&Bs.
Edge: eviivo.
AutoClerk offers core PMS features, including guest profiles, flexible rate management, and basic reporting, but lacks the extensive automation and integrations seen in eviivo. It primarily focuses on property operations, with limited advanced tools.
eviivo provides 51 unique features, including channel management, booking engine, revenue management, guest CRM, email marketing, online check-in/out, automated messaging, and a mobile app. Its feature set supports multi-property management, automation, and guest engagement at a scale AutoClerk cannot match.
Edge: eviivo.
AutoClerk’s reviews commend its 24/7 support and quick issue resolution, with a rating of 4.33/5. Support responsiveness is praised, but limited review volume (only 3 reviews) restricts broader insight.
eviivo’s support ratings are slightly higher at 4.42/5, with recent reviews praising prompt assistance, onboarding guidance, and ongoing customer service. Many users note that eviivo’s dedicated support helps maximize platform value, especially for complex setups.
Edge: eviivo.
AutoClerk integrates with 8 verified partners, including SiteMinder, Duetto, and Cendyn, offering essential third-party connections. Its integration scope is narrower, focusing on key hospitality tools.
eviivo boasts 32 verified integrations, including major OTAs like Expedia, Booking.com, and Airbnb, as well as channel managers, payment processors, and guest communication tools. Its extensive ecosystem supports diverse property types and distribution channels.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s recent reviews, totaling 20 in the last 6 months, reflect a 95% recommendation rate, indicating high satisfaction among users. It’s especially favored by B&Bs, vacation rentals, and small hotels seeking automation and multi-channel exposure.
AutoClerk’s 3 reviews give a more limited picture, with ratings averaging around 3.5/5, mostly praising support but noting limited reporting and room for interface improvements. Its feedback is less recent, reducing confidence in current performance.
Edge: eviivo.
AutoClerk does not publicly disclose pricing details, but it generally offers custom quotes based on hotel size and needs. Its model typically involves a flat or per-room monthly fee, with no free tier or trial.
eviivo charges $700 monthly for its platform, with no free trial or tiered options. Its transparent pricing aligns with its broad feature set, especially suitable for multi-property operators.
Not ideal if you require extensive automation, channel management, or guest engagement features.
Not ideal if you need a minimalist solution or have complex operational requirements that exceed eviivo’s feature scope.
AutoClerk offers a simple, support-driven PMS ideal for small properties with basic needs, but its limited features and older reviews suggest less adaptability for growth. Its core strengths are ease of use and support, but it lacks the extensive automation and integrations needed by expanding properties.
eviivo’s platform excels in providing a comprehensive, feature-rich environment for diverse hospitality providers. Its recent, high-volume reviews demonstrate strong user satisfaction, especially for properties prioritizing automation, multi-channel management, and guest engagement.
If your hotel prioritizes simplicity and support, AutoClerk might suffice. However, for most growing properties seeking advanced tools, automation, and broader integrations, eviivo is the recommended choice.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $700/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Autoclerk (PMS) 和 eviivo Suite™ PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交付过程 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 39 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而... Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而提升了整体用户体验。
该平台在入职流程中提供专业知识,帮助酒店无缝集成系统。该指导确保信息集成的一致性和PMS功能的最佳利用,从而提高物业管理效率。
Eviivo 因其高效的技术而备受认可,它使用户能够更快、更少地完成任务。这减少了停机时间并改善了运营工作流程,确保了酒店管理的流畅体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户建议进行改进,特别是扩展移动应用程序开发等功能以及更具体的日常使用技巧,以进一步优化业务运营并利用平台的功能。
虽然用户总体上感到满意,但仍要求提供更多定制选项,包括网络和移动应用程序增强功能,以进一步满足特定的运营需求并提供额外的价值。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Autoclerk (PMS) 和 eviivo Suite™ PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Autoclerk (PMS) 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 eviivo Suite™ PMS 提供 32 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Autoclerk (PMS):否。eviivo Suite™ PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。AutoClerk, Inc. 的 HT Score 为 0,eviivo 的为 87。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问