项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 970 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Mews 在支持入职和客户成功方面表现出色,尤其适合度假租赁住宿设施(4.8/5),并拥有收益管理模块以及客户关系管理等独家功能。
基于 HTR 上 970 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 联系销售 | 起价 $900/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 3 | 967 |
在分析了 970 条经验证的评价后,AutoClerk, Inc. 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 支持入职和客户成功, 易用性和直观界面, 自动化与工作流程效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持入职和客户成功
▾
|
|
|
+
易用性和直观界面
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化与工作流程效率
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客旅程与自助服务
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
账单开具与支付
▾
|
|
|
−
报告与分析
▾
|
|
|
−
多酒店及集团管理
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 363 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #62 1 条评价 | #1 386 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #58 0 条评价 | #2 80 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 49 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #75 1 条评价 | #2 505 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #71 0 条评价 | #5 238 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #67 0 条评价 | #2 181 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 139 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #57 1 条评价 | #8 110 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 714 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #30 8 条评价 |
Choosing between AutoClerk (PMS) and Mews PMS ultimately hinges on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. AutoClerk offers a straightforward, easy-to-use solution ideal for small to mid-sized independent properties, while Mews provides a broad, integrated platform favored by multi-property groups and tech-forward hotels. Both address core property management needs, but only one is truly designed for modern, scalable hospitality.
Are you looking for a simple, reliable system for a couple of properties or a comprehensive tech ecosystem for rapid growth? Let’s explore how these two products stack up.
AutoClerk has been in the market since 1985, offering a familiar, easy-to-learn system with a focus on core PMS features. Mews, founded in 2012 and now a winner of the HotelTechReport award, emphasizes automation, integrations, and a scalable cloud-native architecture. The key divergence is their review volume and recency: Mews boasts over 750 reviews, 98 from the last six months, and a high 9.12 NPS score, making its customer feedback far more current and extensive than AutoClerk’s three reviews.
AutoClerk’s overall rating of 3.5/5 reflects limited recent praise, while Mews’s 4.62/5 and 99.53/100 HTR Score showcase broad, positive sentiment. Do you want a mature but limited system, or a leading-edge platform with proven recent satisfaction?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, cost-effective PMS with dependable support, AutoClerk is suitable—especially for small resorts or standalone properties that prioritize ease of use. Conversely, if you require a flexible, highly integrated platform capable of managing multiple properties, guest engagement, and revenue optimization, Mews is the clear leader, particularly for hotels with growth plans or complex operations.
For boutique hotels or independent resorts seeking simplicity, AutoClerk’s interface and 24/7 support will serve well. But if your hotel aims to modernize operations, scale quickly, or leverage automation, Mews provides more advanced features and a larger partner ecosystem.
AutoClerk’s UI is rated 4.33/5, praised for its simplicity and ease of learning, but some users find its reporting capabilities limited. Mews scores even higher at 4.7/5, with recent reviews emphasizing its modern, intuitive design that minimizes onboarding and training time.
AutoClerk’s onboarding experience is rated 4.33/5, and Mews edges slightly ahead at 4.39/5, reflecting its user-friendly interface and robust support channels. Overall, Mews’s modern UI and frequent updates make it easier for your team to adopt.
Edge: Mews.
AutoClerk’s feature set is primarily focused on core PMS functions, lacking the extensive capabilities of Mews’s 59+ features. Mews offers modules for revenue management, CRM, online check-in, mobile housekeeping, digital registration, guest messaging, and advanced reporting, among others.
Notably, Mews supports multi-lingual, multi-currency operations, automated night audits, and a marketplace with over 1,000 integrations—features absent in AutoClerk. If you need sophisticated automation and guest engagement tools, Mews is the superior choice.
Edge: Mews.
AutoClerk’s reviews highlight their 24/7 support with quick resolutions, leaving positive impressions about their responsiveness. Mews supports its users with a dedicated onboarding team, extensive online resources, and a support rating of 4.27/5, though some recent reviews mention occasional bugs.
AutoClerk’s limited review count makes it difficult to gauge support consistency, while Mews’s larger user base and recent feedback suggest a more reliable, scalable support experience. For ongoing operational assurance, Mews’s support network is more robust.
Edge: Mews.
AutoClerk integrates with 8 verified partners, including channel managers and revenue tools, but its ecosystem remains small and less adaptable. Mews’s marketplace features over 336 verified integrations, including major channel managers, POS systems, and revenue tools, providing extensive flexibility.
Shared integrations include SiteMinder, Duetto, and Cendyn, but Mews’s broader ecosystem allows more customization and future-proofing. If integrations and automation matter, Mews’s extensive partner network gives it a clear advantage.
Edge: Mews.
AutoClerk’s reviews are sparse, with only three recent opinions, averaging 3/5, and predominantly small hotel segments. Mews, on the other hand, has nearly 760 reviews, with a 4.62/5 rating from a diverse mix of boutique, independent, and branded hotels, especially in recent months.
Hotels of all types consistently praise Mews for operational ease, automation, and support, whereas AutoClerk’s limited, older reviews suggest less recent satisfaction. For guest satisfaction and modern functionality, Mews scores higher across hotel segments.
AutoClerk does not publicly list its pricing, but historically it has operated on custom quotes, often favoring smaller properties. Mews charges a base fee of $900/month, with no implementation or extra fees, making its pricing transparent and predictable.
While AutoClerk might be more affordable upfront, Mews’s value lies in its rich feature set and scalability, which can justify the higher price for growing or multi-property hotels. For newer hotels seeking clarity on costs, Mews’s straightforward pricing model is advantageous.
AutoClerk works best for small-scale independent hotels with limited operational complexity.
Mews suits hotels ready to embrace digital transformation and future growth.
AutoClerk is a straightforward, easy-to-use PMS ideal for small, independent properties that need reliable core functionality without the bells and whistles. Its limited recent reviews and narrow ecosystem make it less suited for hotels with complex operations or aggressive growth plans.
Mews, with its extensive features, recent high ratings, and wide integration network, is the better choice for hotels focused on automation, guest experience, and scalability. Its cloud-native architecture and ongoing innovation position it as a future-proof platform for the modern hospitality industry.
If your hotel values ease and familiarity, AutoClerk can serve well. But for those aiming for operational agility and guest-centric technology, Mews is the clear winner.
酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | — | 起价 $900/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
支持质量和入职流程是评价中的主要区分点:许多客户赞扬响应迅速的客户经理、有效的入职支持和丰富的培训资源。负面反馈同样明显,一些用户描述了工单处理缓慢、... 支持质量和入职流程是评价中的主要区分点:许多客户赞扬响应迅速的客户经理、有效的入职支持和丰富的培训资源。负面反馈同样明显,一些用户描述了工单处理缓慢、升级路径不畅,或支持过于依赖聊天和文章。
一个主要的主题是Mews易于学习,视觉清晰,对前台、客房服务和管理团队来说直观。评论者表示界面缩短了入职培训时间,使日常操作更简单,尽管有少数人提到高级设... 一个主要的主题是Mews易于学习,视觉清晰,对前台、客房服务和管理团队来说直观。评论者表示界面缩短了入职培训时间,使日常操作更简单,尽管有少数人提到高级设置会增加复杂性。
用户反复提到Mews能够自动化处理常规酒店任务,如入住/退房、结算、邮件、房间分配和运营跟进,这节省了时间并减少了人工工作。许多人指出,这种效率使团队能够... 用户反复提到Mews能够自动化处理常规酒店任务,如入住/退房、结算、邮件、房间分配和运营跟进,这节省了时间并减少了人工工作。许多人指出,这种效率使团队能够更多地专注于宾客服务,并以更少的错误和更少的文书工作管理酒店。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
许多评价集中在Mews简化支付、发票、信用卡处理以及将费用记入客人账户或销售点方面。同时,账单流程是最常见的痛点之一,用户提到分账、退款、转账、发票更正和... 许多评价集中在Mews简化支付、发票、信用卡处理以及将费用记入客人账户或销售点方面。同时,账单流程是最常见的痛点之一,用户提到分账、退款、转账、发票更正和会计对账等方面仍需改进。
报告是讨论最多的话题之一,用户希望拥有更好的仪表盘、更深入的分析、更灵活的筛选器,以及更清晰的财务和运营导出。许多人表示Mews提供了有用的数据,但报告层... 报告是讨论最多的话题之一,用户希望拥有更好的仪表盘、更深入的分析、更灵活的筛选器,以及更清晰的财务和运营导出。许多人表示Mews提供了有用的数据,但报告层仍然感觉不够一致,难以定制,或者过于依赖导出到Excel。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Autoclerk (PMS) 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Autoclerk (PMS) 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 352 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Autoclerk (PMS):否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。AutoClerk, Inc. 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 99。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐