The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 824 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
SHR Group 表现出色 在 主动客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 Boutique Hotels 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 ADA Compliant and Paypal.
Net Affinity 表现出色 在 用户友好的预订引擎 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Multi-currency and Multi-lingual.
基于 HTR 上 824 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 512 | 312 |
在分析了 824 条经验证的评价后,SHR Group 用户最看重其 主动客户支持, 集成功能, 直观的界面,而 Net Affinity 用户则强调 用户友好的预订引擎, 主动账户管理, 技术问题和支持。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
主动客户支持
▾
|
+
用户友好的预订引擎
▾
|
|
+
集成功能
▾
|
+
主动账户管理
▾
|
|
+
直观的界面
▾
|
+
技术问题和支持
▾
|
|
+
费率和库存管理
▾
|
+
持续改进
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
后端导航改进
▾
|
−
CMS 挑战
▾
|
|
−
视觉与美学设计
▾
|
|
|
−
支持文档和培训
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #8 76 条评价 | #7 98 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #2 369 条评价 | #5 178 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 39 条评价 | #12 12 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 16 条评价 | #11 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #3 232 条评价 | #7 131 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 320 条评价 | #6 146 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 166 条评价 | #5 92 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 32 条评价 | #5 27 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #8 39 条评价 | #15 7 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 440 条评价 | #4 287 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #15 11 条评价 | #17 7 条评价 |
| 中东 | #16 3 条评价 | #13 4 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine for your hotel can feel overwhelming, especially when both SHR Booking Engine (BE) and Net Affinity promise to boost direct bookings and revenue. SHR Group’s offering is a long-established platform with a sizable user base and extensive integrations, while Net Affinity’s newer system emphasizes speed, mobile experience, and personalized digital marketing. Both aim to streamline your booking process, but which genuinely fits your hotel’s needs?
Both products are designed to improve direct bookings and revenue management, yet they diverge in user experience, features, and market focus. SHR BE benefits from a larger review base and more recent feedback, indicating a more current and reliable solution. Will your hotel prioritize a platform with proven stability or one that pushes innovation with a fresh interface?
SHR Booking Engine has a solid reputation for its broad feature set, extensive integration options, and its proven track record over decades. Its reviews highlight impressive revenue growth, especially for luxury and boutique hotels, though some users mention that its user interface could be more modern. Conversely, Net Affinity emphasizes a sleek, mobile-first experience, rapid performance, and a focus on digital marketing, which shows in its recent reviews and high satisfaction scores.
While SHR BE excels in comprehensive reporting, robust integrations, and a well-established presence across diverse regions, Net Affinity’s newer technology targets on-the-go travelers with fast, intuitive interfaces and tailored marketing strategies. Given the more recent reviews and higher overall ratings, Net Affinity's system is currently more favored by hoteliers seeking innovation.
Would your hotel benefit more from a mature platform with proven results or a modern, highly responsive system designed around today’s digital traveler?
If your hotel needs a solution with extensive integration, a large regional presence, and a history of proven revenue uplift, SHR BE is the safer choice. Its 339 reviews and high ratings (4.86/5 overall, 4.67/5 ease of use) reflect longstanding trust and a broad feature set including unique features like PayPal and ADA compliance.
If your hotel prioritizes a mobile-friendly, speed-oriented booking process with sophisticated digital marketing capabilities, Net Affinity is the better pick. Its 223 reviews and slightly lower but still high overall rating (4.82/5, 4.59/5 ease of use) showcase a product highly regarded for user experience, innovation, and customer service.
For hotels seeking a robust, well-established platform, SHR stands out. For those wanting cutting-edge technology with a focus on guest experience and marketing, Net Affinity takes the lead.
SHR Booking Engine scores a 4.67/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its straightforward interface but pointing out some backend navigation issues. Customers highlight a learning curve, especially regarding report generation and system navigation, but generally find it manageable after onboarding. Its onboarding score of 4.63/5 reflects a solid, if slightly complex, implementation process.
Net Affinity’s interface earns a 4.59/5, with reviews emphasizing its speed, responsiveness, and modern design. Users find it easier to make quick updates and navigate the platform, with an onboarding score of 4.57/5, slightly below SHR but still strong. Reviewers note it’s particularly friendly for non-technical staff and on-the-go users.
Edge: Net Affinity.
SHR BE offers 43 shared features plus three unique, including ADA compliance, PayPal, and PayU. Its specialized features support complex rate management and custom integrations, which are valued by hotels with diverse needs.
Net Affinity also provides 43 shared features but includes two distinctive ones: multi-currency and multi-lingual support. Its features are built around speed, mobile responsiveness, and digital marketing capabilities, making it ideal for hotels targeting international guests or multi-language markets.
Overall, SHR BE’s broader feature set and unique options give it an edge for large or complex operations, but Net Affinity’s specialization in multi-lingual and multi-currency support makes it a compelling choice for international markets.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR Group’s support is highly rated at 4.86/5, with reviews praising proactive, knowledgeable teams and outstanding account management. Many customers describe their support as responsive and instrumental in revenue growth, especially for complex integrations.
Net Affinity’s support scores 4.79/5, with clients emphasizing the quick, helpful responses and ongoing assistance. Users appreciate the personalized communication and continuous system updates, though some mention occasional technical issues that were promptly resolved.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR Group boasts 81 verified integrations, including industry leaders like Criton, Hotelsoft Inc., and WebRezPro, along with exclusive options like Profitroom and OpenHotel. Its extensive partner network supports complex operational needs and custom workflows.
Net Affinity features 62 verified integrations, including popular PMSs, channel managers, and booking tools like Cloudbeds and GuestJoy. Shared partners include Criton and TrustYou, but SHR’s larger ecosystem offers broader options.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR BE’s 339 reviews and a 4.86/5 overall rating reflect a mature, trusted solution, especially valued by boutique, city center, and resort hotels. Recent reviews indicate high satisfaction with its revenue results and support.
Net Affinity’s 223 reviews yield a 4.82/5 rating, with particularly positive feedback from boutique and independent hotels. Its recent reviews reinforce its reputation for speed and innovation, especially among hotels targeting international and digital-savvy travelers.
Overall, SHR’s larger review count and higher rating make it the preferred choice for hoteliers valuing stability and proven results.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR Group does not publicly disclose pricing, which often indicates customized quotes based on hotel size and needs. This can be typical for large, enterprise-level solutions requiring tailored integrations.
Net Affinity charges a base price of $800 per month, with no free tier or trial, and no details about additional fees. Though more transparent, this upfront cost might be a barrier for smaller hotels, but the investment includes continuous updates and support.
In summary, SHR pricing is less transparent but potentially more flexible, while Net Affinity’s straightforward monthly fee suits hotels ready to commit.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, modern interface or has a tight budget, given the less transparent pricing.
Not ideal if your hotel requires complex multi-system integrations or has significant custom backend needs.
SHR BE offers a mature, highly integrated platform proven to drive revenue, with a large user base and extensive regional coverage. It’s a solid choice if your hotel needs deep system connectivity, detailed reporting, and proven stability.
Net Affinity excels with a sleek, mobile-optimized interface, innovative features, and tailored digital marketing. It’s the best option if your hotel values speed, ease of use, and a future-proof digital experience.
In conclusion, choose SHR if your hotel demands a robust, full-featured system with broad integrations. Opt for Net Affinity if you seek a modern, speed-focused, and marketing-savvy booking engine that aligns with today’s digital travelers.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,SHR Booking Engine (BE) 和 Net Affinity (Booking Engine) 共享 43 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| PayU | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 贝宝 |
我们分析了 7 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
"I am very happy with the collaborative relationship we have with Net Affinity and the results we have seen together. There reporting on both marketing and e-commerce give us great..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞 SHR 积极主动且反应迅速的客户支持。客户经理和支持团队被认为非常乐于助人、知识渊博,并且能够快速响应问题。客户成功团队提供的指导对于优化软... 用户经常称赞 SHR 积极主动且反应迅速的客户支持。客户经理和支持团队被认为非常乐于助人、知识渊博,并且能够快速响应问题。客户成功团队提供的指导对于优化软件的使用非常有价值。30 篇评论涵盖了此主题。
经常被强调的一个关键特性是平台强大的集成能力。Windsurfer CRS 可以高效地与各种 PMS、渠道经理和 CRM 工具进行通信,确保跨系统的无缝操作和最新信息。但是,... 经常被强调的一个关键特性是平台强大的集成能力。Windsurfer CRS 可以高效地与各种 PMS、渠道经理和 CRM 工具进行通信,确保跨系统的无缝操作和最新信息。但是,一些用户希望改进与其他系统和平台的集成。此主题出现在 18 篇评论中。
用户对 Windsurfer CRS 的直观界面表示赞赏,它使客人的预订流程变得顺畅,酒店员工的管理也变得轻松。轻松设置和管理房价计划、灵活地自定义预订页面以及简单的... 用户对 Windsurfer CRS 的直观界面表示赞赏,它使客人的预订流程变得顺畅,酒店员工的管理也变得轻松。轻松设置和管理房价计划、灵活地自定义预订页面以及简单的导航有助于提高整体效率。此主题在 20 条评论中被提及。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户指出,虽然前端很人性化,但后端导航和过滤选项可以更加直观和人性化。这些方面的改进可以显著提高效率和用户满意度。此主题在 12 条评论中被提及。
一些用户建议可以改进预订引擎的视觉美感。增强用户界面的精致和现代设计可以进一步提升整体预订体验,并使其更具视觉吸引力。6 篇评论讨论了此主题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户称赞 Netaffinity 预订引擎简单易用,能够有效增加直接预订量。它可以轻松创建和编辑价格和套餐。不过,一些用户提到学习难度高,搜索功能和链接集成方... 许多用户称赞 Netaffinity 预订引擎简单易用,能够有效增加直接预订量。它可以轻松创建和编辑价格和套餐。不过,一些用户提到学习难度高,搜索功能和链接集成方面还有待改进。
许多评论都强调了 Netaffinity 客户经理的积极性和支持性作用。他们因及时的帮助、建设性的反馈和个性化的支持而受到赞扬,用户认为这些有助于提高他们的在线表... 许多评论都强调了 Netaffinity 客户经理的积极性和支持性作用。他们因及时的帮助、建设性的反馈和个性化的支持而受到赞扬,用户认为这些有助于提高他们的在线表现。定期沟通和详细的每月评论受到赞赏。
一些评论提到预订引擎和其他功能偶尔会出现技术问题。但是,用户也强调 Netaffinity 技术团队在解决这些问题时提供的快速高效支持。改进建议包括提前通知问题和... 一些评论提到预订引擎和其他功能偶尔会出现技术问题。但是,用户也强调 Netaffinity 技术团队在解决这些问题时提供的快速高效支持。改进建议包括提前通知问题和提供更好的支持文档。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然许多人一旦习惯了 Netaffinity 的 CMS 就觉得它很人性化,但也有人抱怨它最初的复杂性和功能性。用户建议改进导航、内容管理和系统的整体直观性。他们经常建... 虽然许多人一旦习惯了 Netaffinity 的 CMS 就觉得它很人性化,但也有人抱怨它最初的复杂性和功能性。用户建议改进导航、内容管理和系统的整体直观性。他们经常建议定期更新系统和提供更好的培训材料。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。SHR Booking Engine (BE) 和 Net Affinity (Booking Engine) 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。SHR Booking Engine (BE) 提供 81 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Net Affinity (Booking Engine) 提供 62 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。SHR Booking Engine (BE) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
SHR Booking Engine (BE):否。Net Affinity (Booking Engine):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。SHR Group 的 HT Score 为 45,Net Affinity 的为 42。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问