The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 557 条经验证的评价后,SHR Group 用户最看重其 主动客户支持, 集成功能, 直观的界面,而 ROIBACK 用户则强调 支持和客户服务, 直接预订优化, 技术改进。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
主动客户支持
▾
|
+
支持和客户服务
▾
|
|
+
集成功能
▾
|
+
直接预订优化
▾
|
|
+
直观的界面
▾
|
+
技术改进
▾
|
|
+
费率和库存管理
▾
|
+
报告和分析
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
后端导航改进
▾
|
−
多语言和用户友好界面
▾
|
|
−
视觉与美学设计
▾
|
−
支付网关
▾
|
|
−
支持文档和培训
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #8 76 条评价 | #29 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #2 369 条评价 | #22 18 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 39 条评价 | #14 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 16 条评价 | #10 6 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #3 232 条评价 | #24 15 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 320 条评价 | #23 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 166 条评价 | #18 13 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 32 条评价 | #19 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #8 39 条评价 | #18 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 440 条评价 | #20 12 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #15 11 条评价 | #10 14 条评价 |
| 中东 | #16 3 条评价 | #14 3 条评价 |
Choosing between SHR Booking Engine (BE) by SHR Group and Roiback's Booking Engine depends on your hotel’s specific needs. Both platforms aim to increase direct bookings and streamline operations, but they differ significantly in features, market presence, and user feedback. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize recent, highly-rated support and extensive integrations or a more established platform with advanced, exclusive features.
SHR Group’s booking engine boasts higher overall ratings, more reviews, and recent user feedback, making it the more reliable choice today. Are you ready to see which platform aligns best with your hotel’s goals?
Both SHR Booking Engine and Roiback cater to hotels seeking to boost direct bookings, but they approach this goal differently. SHR’s platform emphasizes comprehensive integration, advanced features, and a high customer satisfaction score, backed by over 339 reviews, including recent feedback. Roiback, meanwhile, offers a broad feature set with strong analytics but fewer recent reviews and a smaller total review count—just 43.
SHR’s larger user base and recent positive reviews suggest that its platform is more trusted and actively supported in the market today. Conversely, Roiback’s focus on flexibility and customization makes it appealing for hotels with complex needs or those already integrated into its ecosystem.
Do you need a platform with proven support and extensive integrations, or one that offers more customization options?
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, proven support, and a platform with a vast array of features, SHR Booking Engine is the clear choice. Its 4.86/5 overall rating from 339 reviews—more than ten times Roiback’s—indicates higher user satisfaction, especially with onboarding and customer support.
For hotels that need robust reporting, exclusive features like automated reporting, pooled inventory, and various rate management options, SHR offers more than its competitor. However, if your hotel requires a flexible, multi-language platform with a focus on analytics and personalized consulting, Roiback’s feature set and support may be advantageous.
In essence, choose SHR if you want a trusted, widely-adopted platform, and Roiback if customization and international reach are your priorities.
SHR’s ease of use scores 4.67/5, with reviewers praising its intuitive interface and smooth onboarding process. Customers highlight its straightforward navigation, making it accessible even for smaller teams, and note the proactive support from SHR’s customer service.
Roiback also scores well at 4.49/5, with users appreciating its user-friendly design and responsive support team. Some feedback suggests that both platforms could improve backend navigation, but SHR’s higher overall satisfaction and more recent positive reviews position it slightly ahead.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR Booking Engine’s 36 shared features include essentials like multi-channel connectivity, rate management, and channel pooling, but it also offers 10 exclusive features. These include A/B testing, special offers, gift vouchers, ADA compliance, and automated reporting, providing a competitive edge.
Roiback offers a solid feature set but lacks the additional exclusive functionalities seen in SHR. While it supports essential integrations and features, SHR’s broader feature catalog positions it as the more versatile choice.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR’s customer support scores 4.86/5, backed by 30 recent reviews praising its proactive, responsive assistance. Hoteliers consistently mention the value of dedicated account managers and quick issue resolution, emphasizing their confidence in SHR’s support team.
Roiback’s support score is slightly lower at 4.72/5, with reviews highlighting its responsiveness and personalized consulting. However, fewer recent reviews make SHR’s support seem more reliable currently.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR boasts 81 verified integration partners, including major PMS, channel managers, and tech providers like SiteMinder, RateGain, and Criton. Its extensive partner network ensures smooth operations across multiple systems.
Roiback has 27 verified integrations, with notable partners like RoomRaccoon and STAAH. While these cover essential needs, SHR’s larger ecosystem provides more flexibility and options for complex setups.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR’s overall rating of 4.86/5 from 339 reviews significantly surpasses Roiback’s rating of 0/5 from 43 reviews, reflecting a stronger reputation. Hotel segments such as boutique hotels and city center properties rate SHR higher, with many recent reviews citing reliability and support.
Roiback’s smaller review base and lower ratings suggest less confidence among users, especially in support and user experience. SHR’s extensive review history and recent positive feedback make it the more trusted platform.
Edge: SHR Booking Engine.
SHR Group does not publicly disclose its pricing, indicating a customized quote based on hotel size and needs. Roiback charges a flat $500 monthly fee, with no setup or implementation fees, but this may vary based on the package and features.
High costs for SHR might be justified by its extensive features and support; Roiback’s transparent pricing suits smaller hotels with tight budgets. Evaluate your hotel’s feature needs and budget accordingly.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, budget-constrained, or prefers a less feature-rich, more straightforward platform.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a platform with a large, established ecosystem and extensive pre-integrated features.
SHR Booking Engine offers a more established, highly-rated solution with a broad feature set, extensive integrations, and proactive support. Its 339 reviews and superior recent ratings demonstrate high user confidence and reliability.
Roiback provides a flexible, international-focused platform with strong analytics and support, suitable for hotels with complex needs or international markets. However, its smaller review base and lower ratings suggest it may not currently match SHR’s market trust.
In conclusion, if your priority is proven performance, comprehensive features, and reliable support, SHR Booking Engine is the stronger choice. If customization and international reach are more critical, consider Roiback, but be aware of its smaller user base and review volume.
我们分析了 5 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
"Partnering with Roiback has been a game-changer, as their innovative solutions and close support by our Direct Channel Specialist have empowered Jasmine City Group to reach new h..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞 SHR 积极主动且反应迅速的客户支持。客户经理和支持团队被认为非常乐于助人、知识渊博,并且能够快速响应问题。客户成功团队提供的指导对于优化软... 用户经常称赞 SHR 积极主动且反应迅速的客户支持。客户经理和支持团队被认为非常乐于助人、知识渊博,并且能够快速响应问题。客户成功团队提供的指导对于优化软件的使用非常有价值。30 篇评论涵盖了此主题。
经常被强调的一个关键特性是平台强大的集成能力。Windsurfer CRS 可以高效地与各种 PMS、渠道经理和 CRM 工具进行通信,确保跨系统的无缝操作和最新信息。但是,... 经常被强调的一个关键特性是平台强大的集成能力。Windsurfer CRS 可以高效地与各种 PMS、渠道经理和 CRM 工具进行通信,确保跨系统的无缝操作和最新信息。但是,一些用户希望改进与其他系统和平台的集成。此主题出现在 18 篇评论中。
用户对 Windsurfer CRS 的直观界面表示赞赏,它使客人的预订流程变得顺畅,酒店员工的管理也变得轻松。轻松设置和管理房价计划、灵活地自定义预订页面以及简单的... 用户对 Windsurfer CRS 的直观界面表示赞赏,它使客人的预订流程变得顺畅,酒店员工的管理也变得轻松。轻松设置和管理房价计划、灵活地自定义预订页面以及简单的导航有助于提高整体效率。此主题在 20 条评论中被提及。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户指出,虽然前端很人性化,但后端导航和过滤选项可以更加直观和人性化。这些方面的改进可以显著提高效率和用户满意度。此主题在 12 条评论中被提及。
一些用户建议可以改进预订引擎的视觉美感。增强用户界面的精致和现代设计可以进一步提升整体预订体验,并使其更具视觉吸引力。6 篇评论讨论了此主题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要... Roiback 的专业支持团队(包括客户经理和直接渠道专家)获得了高度赞誉。用户对他们的响应能力、专业知识和个性化咨询表示赞赏,这些都对实现业务目标起到了重要作用。
Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有... Roiback 通过用户友好的预订引擎、创新的直销策略以及忠诚度计划和促销套餐等工具来提高直接预订量。酒店运营商报告称,在线销售量大幅增长,直接渠道可见度也有所提高。
关键反馈包括要求加快系统响应速度、减少重复和 404 错误等技术故障以及统一平台以简化流程。这些技术改进对于实现无缝用户体验至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
该平台的用户友好型和直观预订引擎受到好评,并提到其流畅的多语言支持和易用性。然而,一些用户要求改进默认语言设置和界面设计,以提供更好的用户体验。
虽然该平台支持多种支付网关,但用户建议需要扩展支付选项,特别是整合更多的本地和国际网关,以避免连接问题。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。SHR Booking Engine (BE) 和 Roiback | Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。SHR Booking Engine (BE) 提供 81 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Roiback | Booking Engine 提供 27 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。SHR Booking Engine (BE) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
SHR Booking Engine (BE):否。Roiback | Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。SHR Group 的 HT Score 为 46,ROIBACK 的为 72。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问