The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 262 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
SHR Group 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Optimized/Responsive.
Big Fish Internet 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 262 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 262 | 0 |
在分析了 262 条经验证的评价后,SHR Group 用户最看重其 主动客户管理, 网站设计, 报告和分析,而 Big Fish Internet 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Big Fish Internet |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
主动客户管理
▾
|
|
|
+
网站设计
▾
|
|
|
+
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
+
数字营销
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
代金券系统
▾
|
|
|
−
模板限制
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 网站设计 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Big Fish Internet |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #9 30 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 208 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #6 13 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #14 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Big Fish Internet |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #4 115 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 163 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 84 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 16 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Big Fish Internet |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #11 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 244 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 5 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right website design platform for your hotel hinges on a few critical factors: clarity, usability, feature depth, support, and value. SHR Website Design by SHR Group and Big Fish Internet aim to serve this purpose but approach it differently. SHR Group offers a data-driven, feature-rich solution with recent, high-volume reviews, while Big Fish Internet provides a more generalized website management tool with no recent reviews or user ratings. How do these differences impact your decision?
Both products address building and maintaining your hotel’s online presence, but SHR Group's platform emphasizes tailored design, advanced integrations, and guest-focused features. Big Fish Internet aims to streamline website management, prioritizing ease of use over specialized hospitality features. Are you seeking a purpose-built hospitality website solution or a flexible general platform?
SHR Website Design is built specifically for hotels, offering custom layouts, mobile responsiveness, SEO tools, and integrations with PMS and booking engines. It’s tailored to create guest-centric, conversion-optimized websites. In contrast, Big Fish Internet caters to a broad audience, providing essential website management tools without industry-specific features or recent user feedback.
While SHR Group’s solution focuses on hospitality needs like ADA compliance and multi-lingual support, Big Fish Internet emphasizes ease of content updates and security. If your hotel needs a website that aligns closely with industry standards and maximizes direct bookings, SHR is the clear choice. Do you need a platform designed exclusively for hospitality, or a general website solution?
If your hotel requires a website that reflects your brand identity with extensive customization, advanced integrations, and features like booking engines, SEO plugins, and personalization, go with SHR Website Design. Its proven track record with 169 reviews and a 4.87/5 rating shows strong recent satisfaction among hoteliers.
Conversely, if your priority is simple website management, quick deployment, and minimal complexity without industry-specific features, Big Fish Internet might suffice. However, with no recent reviews, it’s hard to gauge current support or performance. For hotels aiming for competitive, guest-friendly online presence, SHR’s dedicated features make it the better option.
SHR Website Design boasts a high ease of use score at 4.69/5, supported by detailed onboarding and positive reviews highlighting its intuitive interface. Users find its drag-and-drop builder, template options, and customization straightforward, though some note a learning curve for advanced features.
Big Fish Internet, despite lacking recent review data, emphasizes user-friendliness through its simplified website management tools. Its platform is designed for non-technical users, with fast content updates and reliable security. Given the absence of recent feedback, SHR’s established user ratings give it the edge. Edge: SHR Website Design.
SHR Website Design offers 14 unique features including ADA compliance, SSL/HTTPS security, Google Analytics integration, mobile responsiveness, customizable attractions maps, website personalization, popups, multi-lingual support, drag-and-drop page builder, hotel templates, customizable themes, social media integration, and SEO plugins. These cater specifically to hotel marketing and guest experience needs.
Big Fish Internet provides core website management tools like content editing, hosting, basic SEO, and security, but lacks industry-specific features. Its value lies in simplicity rather than feature depth. For hotels seeking robust, guest-oriented website features, SHR’s suite clearly outperforms. Edge: SHR Website Design.
SHR Group’s support scores 4.85/5, with reviews praising responsive, knowledgeable assistance and proactive account management. Guests appreciate dedicated support teams, quick problem resolution, and helpful onboarding, making the process smooth despite some complexity.
Big Fish Internet, however, has no recent reviews or ratings to assess support quality. While its platform emphasizes user-friendly management, the lack of recent customer feedback leaves its support reputation uncertain. Based on current data, SHR’s support is superior. Edge: SHR Website Design.
SHR’s platform connects with 81 verified partners, including prominent PMS, booking engines, and marketing tools such as Criton, Priority Software, Right Revenue, and OpenHotel. These integrations streamline operations and enhance your website’s functionality.
Big Fish Internet offers no verified integrations, limiting its adaptability for hotels that rely on multiple systems. If seamless system integration is vital for your hotel’s digital operations, SHR’s extensive partner network provides a clear advantage. Edge: SHR Website Design.
With 169 recent reviews, SHR Group holds an impressive 4.87/5 rating, with a 96% likelihood to recommend and overall scores indicating high satisfaction. Hotels across various segments, especially boutique, city center, and resort properties, praise the platform’s ease of use, support, and impact on bookings.
Big Fish Internet has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction or performance. Given the data, SHR’s reputation and recent feedback make it the preferred choice for hoteliers seeking proven results. Edge: SHR Website Design.
SHR Group charges a base price of $900, with no additional implementation or monthly fees, making it transparent and predictable. There’s no mention of a free trial or tiered pricing, emphasizing a straightforward purchase.
Big Fish Internet does not disclose pricing details, which suggests it might be customized or variable, but lack of transparency complicates comparison. For budget-conscious hotels, SHR’s clear pricing adds confidence. If you prefer flexible, pay-as-you-go models, further inquiry into Big Fish’s costs is needed, but SHR’s straightforward fee structure is advantageous.
The core difference lies in their focus: SHR Group offers a dedicated, feature-rich website solution made for hospitality, while Big Fish Internet provides a more general website management platform suited for broad business needs. SHR’s tailored features, recent high ratings, and extensive integrations position it as the superior choice for hotels committed to digital excellence.
Choose SHR if you want a website designed to convert guests, improve online visibility, and integrate with your existing hospitality tech stack. If your needs are minimal, and ease of management is your priority, Big Fish might suffice, but its lack of recent reviews makes it a less reliable option.
For most hotels, especially those seeking growth and a competitive edge, SHR Website Design stands out as the more trustworthy, proven platform. It delivers industry-specific tools backed by positive recent feedback, ensuring your hotel’s online presence supports your broader business goals.
网站设计 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
Big Fish Internet | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,SHR Website Design 和 Big Fish Internet 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
Big Fish Internet |
|---|---|---|
| 可定制的景点地图 | ||
| 安全协议 (SSL/HTTPS) | ||
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 谷歌分析连接 | ||
| 预订引擎 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 2 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Our results and KPIs from booking engine to digital reinforce the effectiveness of our partnership and SHR Group's exceptional technology."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户对敬业的客户管理团队积极主动、响应迅速的支持表示赞赏。客户经理通常被描述为知识渊博、致力于客户成功,并随时提供见解和建议以推动业务增长。
SRH Group 因其现代、视觉冲击力强且用户友好的网站设计而备受赞誉,这些设计增强了客人的预订体验。客户指出,这些设计大大提高了可见度和转化率。然而,一些客... SRH Group 因其现代、视觉冲击力强且用户友好的网站设计而备受赞誉,这些设计增强了客人的预订体验。客户指出,这些设计大大提高了可见度和转化率。然而,一些客户表示需要更灵活的定制和更快的周转时间。
SRH Group 提供的广泛而深入的报告功能一直受到好评,它提供了清晰的绩效趋势洞察和可操作数据,帮助酒店经营者做出明智的决策。用户发现这些报告对于战略调整和... SRH Group 提供的广泛而深入的报告功能一直受到好评,它提供了清晰的绩效趋势洞察和可操作数据,帮助酒店经营者做出明智的决策。用户发现这些报告对于战略调整和绩效跟踪至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
SRH Group 实施的优惠券系统收到的评价褒贬不一。虽然评价认为该系统可以增加收入,但一些用户也指出了可以改进的地方,包括更简单的优惠券管理和部分兑换。
虽然 SRH Group 的模板通常因其视觉吸引力而受到称赞,但一些用户发现它们具有限制性,并希望有更多的定制选项来更好地反映其独特的品牌形象。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。SHR Website Design 和 Big Fish Internet 共享许多核心 Website Design 功能,但各有独特的能力。SHR Website Design 提供 81 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Big Fish Internet 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。SHR Website Design 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
SHR Website Design:否。Big Fish Internet:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Website Design 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。SHR Group 的 HT Score 为 43,Big Fish Internet 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问