The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 315 条经验证的评价后,Hotelogix 用户最看重其 支持团队, 易于使用, 预订管理,而 innRoad 用户则强调 客户支持质量, 定制和灵活性, 预订仪表板和报告。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
+
客户支持质量
▾
|
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
+
定制和灵活性
▾
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
+
预订仪表板和报告
▾
|
|
+
基于云的访问
▾
|
+
胶带图表和颜色编码
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
其他建议
▾
|
−
费率和付款管理
▾
|
|
−
用户界面问题
▾
|
−
用户界面故障
▾
|
|
−
移动功能改进
▾
|
−
移动可访问性和应用程序功能
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 44 条评价 | #4 150 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #27 13 条评价 | #13 41 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #27 2 条评价 | #15 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #32 0 条评价 | #16 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #19 27 条评价 | #9 86 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #16 26 条评价 | #13 37 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #22 10 条评价 | #12 33 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #30 3 条评价 | #7 18 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #37 4 条评价 | #1 229 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #30 4 条评价 | #29 6 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #6 48 条评价 | #26 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | #21 1 条评价 | #25 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine is pivotal for your hotel’s growth. Both Hotelogix (formerly AxisRooms) and innRoad aim to simplify your booking management and increase revenue, but they differ significantly in scale, features, and user feedback. Hotelogix offers a more established platform with extensive support, while innRoad emphasizes ease of use and higher customer satisfaction. Which one aligns best with your hotel’s specific needs?
Hotelogix and innRoad both serve as booking engines designed to enhance your hotel’s distribution and reservation processes. Hotelogix focuses on multi-property management and integration, while innRoad emphasizes increasing direct bookings through a mobile-friendly, intuitive interface. Hotelogix has a higher overall rating and more recent reviews, indicating it’s the more trusted platform among hoteliers today, but does that mean it’s the right fit for your hotel?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive system that supports multiple properties, complex integrations, and detailed reporting, Hotelogix is the clear choice. Its extensive partner network and region coverage make it ideal for larger or multi-location hotels seeking granular control. Conversely, if your hotel prioritizes simplicity, quick onboarding, and increasing direct bookings—especially on a smaller scale—innRoad is the more suitable option, with its user-friendly design and proven boost in bookings.
Hotelogix scores a 4.69/5 for ease of use, praised for its straightforward interface and smooth onboarding process. Reviewers highlight its user-friendly layout, although some mention that the UI feels dated and could benefit from modernization. innRoad also scores high at 4.44/5, with many users calling it intuitive and easy to navigate, especially for small teams transitioning from manual processes. However, some users report glitches and slow response times, which can hinder daily operations. Edge: Hotelogix.
innRoad offers a broader range of features—52 compared to Hotelogix’s 2—covering multi-currency support, channel management, property management, group bookings, gift vouchers, and more. Its feature set is designed to handle various operational needs, including online payments, guest communication, and detailed analytics. Hotelogix, by contrast, provides core booking functions but lacks the extensive suite of unique features found in innRoad. Edge: innRoad.
Hotelogix’s support team is highly rated at 4.73/5, with reviews praising their quick response, helpfulness, and 24/7 availability. Many users share positive experiences with resolving issues efficiently, though some mention a need for UI improvements. innRoad’s support scores slightly lower at 4.44/5, with some users citing delays and technical glitches. However, innRoad’s support is often praised for its responsiveness and friendly service. Edge: Hotelogix.
innRoad boasts 34 verified partners, including key integrations with QuickBooks, Revinate, and Onity, alongside prominent OTAs like Expedia and Airbnb. Hotelogix has 25 verified partners, sharing many common integrations but fewer overall options. The broader integration network in innRoad enables more seamless connections with other systems and channels. Edge: innRoad.
Hotelogix has a lower overall rating of 3.64/5 based on 60 reviews, but recent feedback and a higher NPS score suggest solid satisfaction among its users, especially in customer support and ease of use. InnRoad, with 200 reviews and a 4.68/5 rating, shows strong approval from small and mid-sized hotels, particularly in North America. Hotelogix’s more recent reviews reinforce its reliability. Edge: Hotelogix.
Both platforms do not publicly disclose specific pricing models, but neither offers free plans or freemium versions. Hotelogix typically charges a monthly fee per property, while innRoad emphasizes no hidden fees or contracts, suggesting similar subscription-based models. Exact costs depend on your hotel’s size and feature requirements, so direct inquiries are recommended.
Hotels that benefit from Hotelogix include:
Not ideal if:
innRoad suits:
Not ideal if:
Hotelogix provides a broad, scalable platform with high support ratings, making it ideal for larger, multi-property hotels needing detailed control and extensive integrations. Its recent reviews underscore its stability, support, and reliability, especially in complex environments.
innRoad excels in ease of use, has a more extensive feature set, and shows clear evidence of increasing direct bookings and revenue. Its simplicity makes it suitable for small to mid-sized hotels prioritizing quick onboarding and straightforward operations.
If your hotel needs advanced multi-property management and robust integrations, go with Hotelogix. If your goal is to maximize direct bookings with a user-friendly platform, innRoad is the stronger choice.
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Hotelogix 的支持团队反应迅速、高效且全天候待命,因此广受好评。许多评论者都称赞团队成员服务出色,他们快速解决问题,提供有用的指导。持续的支持可提高用户... Hotelogix 的支持团队反应迅速、高效且全天候待命,因此广受好评。许多评论者都称赞团队成员服务出色,他们快速解决问题,提供有用的指导。持续的支持可提高用户满意度和运营效率。
用户对 Hotelogix 的易用性赞不绝口。该系统的操作步骤简单,设计人性化,即使是不太熟悉酒店管理软件的人也能轻松上手。该软件的布局直观,简化了日常操作,使... 用户对 Hotelogix 的易用性赞不绝口。该系统的操作步骤简单,设计人性化,即使是不太熟悉酒店管理软件的人也能轻松上手。该软件的布局直观,简化了日常操作,使员工培训和管理任务更加轻松。
评论者对 Hotelogix 的高效预订管理系统表示赞赏。该工具提供无缝预订集成、轻松跟踪过去预订以及轻松处理多个预订。此外,它还有助于防止超额预订并简化预订流... 评论者对 Hotelogix 的高效预订管理系统表示赞赏。该工具提供无缝预订集成、轻松跟踪过去预订以及轻松处理多个预订。此外,它还有助于防止超额预订并简化预订流程。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
审阅者还提供了各种改进反馈,例如提高加载速度、集成材料管理功能以及提高事后审核灵活性。这些建议突出了 Hotelogix 可以进一步提高用户满意度的领域。
虽然普遍受到好评,但一些用户对 Hotelogix 的用户界面表示不满,称其过时。尽管注意到有改进,但评论者建议对用户界面进行现代化改造,以提升整体用户体验。
排名更高的方面
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户支持服务通常因响应迅速、知识渊博、及时解决问题而受到称赞。然而,也有人提到响应速度慢,以及与英语不流利的支持人员沟通不畅,这可能会让用户感到沮丧。
用户经常提到 InnRoad 提供的高度定制和灵活性,特别是在房间外观、计费功能和报告方面。这使酒店能够根据其特定需求定制软件,从而提高运营效率和客人满意度。
预订仪表板和综合报告功能因其提供可操作见解和简化数据管理的能力而备受瞩目。这些工具可帮助酒店经理跟踪入住率、收入和其他关键绩效指标,从而更轻松地做出明... 预订仪表板和综合报告功能因其提供可操作见解和简化数据管理的能力而备受瞩目。这些工具可帮助酒店经理跟踪入住率、收入和其他关键绩效指标,从而更轻松地做出明智的决策并提高整体酒店绩效。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户对该系统管理费率和付款(包括费率变更和分期付款)的能力表示赞赏。然而,有些人认为这些功能复杂且耗时,这表明需要更精简的流程来提高效率和客户满意度。
一些用户报告称,用户界面出现故障且加载速度缓慢,这可能会扰乱日常操作。系统冻结和功能错误等问题表明需要增强稳定性和速度。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Hotelogix Booking Engine (formerly AxisRooms) 和 innRoad Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hotelogix Booking Engine (formerly AxisRooms) 提供 25 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 innRoad Booking Engine 提供 34 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Hotelogix Booking Engine (formerly AxisRooms) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Hotelogix Booking Engine (formerly AxisRooms):否。innRoad Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Hotelogix 的 HT Score 为 77,innRoad 的为 34。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问