Beds24 vs Clock HMS: 酒店管理软件 Comparison (2026)

Beds24 与 Clock HMS 相比如何？

基于 HTR 上 80 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

	Beds24	Clock
HTScore	0	80
推荐可能性	0%	96%
易用性	0.0/5	4.8/5
客户支持	0.0/5	4.8/5
性价比	0.0/5	4.7/5

起始价格	From $100/mo	From $600/mo
经验证的评价	0	80

Beds24 与 Clock HMS 的优缺点是什么？

在分析了 80 条经验证的评价后，Beds24 用户最看重其，而 Clock 用户则强调 ease of use and accessibility, reservation and booking management, 客户服务与支持。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Beds24	Clock
优点
	+ Ease of Use and Accessibility ▾ Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage tasks efficiently. Several reviews highlighted the ability to access the system from anywhere as a key benefit. The platform's user-friendly design is especially beneficial for new staff training.
	+ Reservation and Booking Management ▾ Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy reservation management and integrates with channel managers, enabling automatic booking imports, which helps in maintaining real-time availability and reducing manual entry errors.
	+ 客户服务与支持 ▾ Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持，以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评，但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导和复杂功能支持。
	+ 集成与连接 ▾ 该软件与外部平台集成良好，并提供渠道管理功能。用户对其与外部系统同步以实现流畅操作的能力表示赞赏。然而，用户希望该软件能够进一步增强与银行POS系统和会计软件的集成，以进一步简化操作。
缺点
	− 报告和分析 ▾ 尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求，但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成，以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分用户认为现有报告功能不足，且难以从中获取全面的洞察。
	− 定制化和灵活性 ▾ 用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置，以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意，但部分用户指出，他们希望修改报告和界面设置，以便更好地支持动态运营和营销策略。
	− 移动和用户界面 ▾ 用户要求开发更强大的移动应用程序，以便在移动设备上充分利用系统功能。虽然现有界面实用且用户友好，但仍建议进行一些美观和功能方面的改进，例如更改颜色和添加离线数据缓存功能。

Beds24 对比 Clock：按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的酒店管理软件供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场	Beds24	Clock
小型（10-24 间客房） ▾	#48 0 条评价	#21 19 条评价
Beds24 暂无细分市场摘要。 Clock 小型酒店表示，根据 HotelTechReport 的验证评论，Clock 的酒店管理软件排名很高，因为它具有用户友好的界面、强大的客户支持和高效的集成功能，使其成为无缝管理运营和预订的理想选择。
中型（25-74 间客房） ▾	—	#14 28 条评价
Beds24 暂无细分市场摘要。 Clock 中型酒店普遍认为，Clock 的酒店管理软件凭借其用户友好的界面、基于云端的访问方式以及卓越的客户支持而脱颖而出。HotelTechReport 的认证评测也强调了这些优势，使 Clock 成为中型酒店提升运营效率和改善客户沟通的首选。
大型（75-199 间客房）	—	#17 2 条评价
超大型（200+ 间客房） ▾	—	#5 5 条评价
Beds24 暂无细分市场摘要。 Clock 据 HotelTechReport 认证评论显示，大型酒店表示，Clock 的酒店管理软件凭借其多物业管理、现代云架构和集成功能，能够有效支持其运营。这些功能对于大规模环境下的集中控制和无缝运营至关重要。

按物业类型

细分市场	Beds24	Clock
精品酒店 ▾	#44 0 条评价	#18 30 条评价
Beds24 暂无细分市场摘要。 Clock 精品酒店表示，Clock 的酒店管理软件在 HotelTechReport 的认证评测中备受好评，其优势在于用户友好的界面、全面的运营集成以及高效的客户支持。这些特点与精品酒店对高效、灵活解决方案的需求完美契合。
豪华酒店 ▾	—	#18 14 条评价
Beds24 暂无细分市场摘要。 Clock 根据HotelTechReport的认证评测，豪华酒店普遍认为Clock酒店管理软件凭借其用户友好的界面、强大的集成能力和可靠的客户支持而脱颖而出。这些优势对于提升豪华酒店的运营效率至关重要。
品牌/连锁酒店 ▾	—	#15 15 条评价
Beds24 暂无细分市场摘要。 Clock 品牌酒店表示，Clock 的酒店管理软件因其直观的用户界面、高效的云端运营和响应迅速的客户支持而备受青睐。经 HotelTechReport 验证的评论也经常强调这些方面对于品牌酒店管理其多样化的酒店运营需求至关重要。
长住酒店 ▾	—	#16 8 条评价
Beds24 暂无细分市场摘要。 Clock 根据 HotelTechReport 的验证评论，长期住宿服务式公寓酒店表示，Clock 的酒店管理软件因其用户友好的界面、全面的基于云的管理功能和可靠的客户支持而脱颖而出，所有这些对于长期住宿服务式公寓的功能和顺利运营都至关重要。

按区域

细分市场	Beds24	Clock
北美 ▾	#30 0 条评价	#17 11 条评价
Beds24 暂无细分市场摘要。 Clock Na酒店表示，Clock酒店管理软件凭借其用户友好的界面、响应迅速的客户支持和无缝集成功能而脱颖而出，这一点已在HotelTechReport的认证评测中得到证实。这些优势对于Na酒店的有效运营至关重要。
欧洲 ▾	—	#9 38 条评价
Beds24 暂无细分市场摘要。 Clock 欧洲酒店表示，Clock 的酒店管理软件凭借其用户友好的界面、强大的多物业管理功能和响应迅速的客户支持，在 HotelTechReport 的认证评测中获得了很高的评价。这款基于云端的系统能够有效简化运营流程并提升宾客互动体验。
亚太	—	#12 4 条评价
中东	—	#18 2 条评价

The Decision
Choosing the right hotel management software depends on your hotel’s size, complexity, and operational needs. Beds24 and Clock HMS aim to streamline your daily tasks, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. Beds24 is an all-in-one platform popular among property managers and vacation rentals, whereas Clock HMS is a more extensive hotel-centric system with a focus on revenue management and integrations. Which aligns better with your hotel's goals?
Both products promise to improve your operational efficiency, but their approaches and strengths vary. Beds24 excels in automation and multi-channel management, while Clock HMS emphasizes revenue growth and seamless integrations. Are you prioritizing automation, integrations, or revenue optimization?

Is Beds24 or Clock HMS Better for Hotels?

Beds24 offers a comprehensive platform ideal for diverse property types, including vacation rentals, hostels, and small hotels. It centralizes reservations, guest communication, and channel management, making it a good fit for owners managing multiple properties or those seeking automation. Conversely, Clock HMS is designed for hotels that need robust revenue management, dynamic pricing, and extensive integrations, especially larger or more complex properties.

The key difference lies in their target users: Beds24’s flexible, all-in-one approach suits smaller operations or property managers, while Clock’s focus on revenue and feature depth appeals to established hotels with more sophisticated needs. Do you need a broad management tool or a revenue-centric system?

Beds24’s recent reviews lack detailed feedback, but its 19 verified partners and 0/5 overall rating indicate limited ongoing user satisfaction. Clock, with 63 reviews and a 4.88/5 rating, demonstrates strong, current user confidence. Would your team prefer a platform with proven, recent positive feedback or one still developing its reputation?

Beds24 vs Clock HMS: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a versatile channel manager, automation, and a straightforward interface, Beds24 is a solid pick. It’s suitable for property managers seeking a customizable, budget-friendly solution with integrations for platforms like Airbnb, Vrbo, and Booking.com.

If your hotel requires advanced revenue tools, extensive integrations, and a focus on guest experience, Clock HMS is the better choice. Its 20 exclusive features—such as POS, guest feedback, online check-in, and digital registration—cater to hotels aiming to boost revenue and streamline operations. For hotels prioritizing revenue management and operational depth, Clock stands out.

For boutique hotels and independent properties looking to automate reservations and simplify guest communication, Beds24 fits well. Larger hotels needing a scalable system with revenue tools and extensive integrations will benefit more from Clock.

Is Beds24 or Clock HMS Easier to Use?

Clock HMS scores a 4.73/5 for ease of use based on recent reviews, with users praising its straightforward navigation, support, and quick onboarding. Clock’s cloud-based platform with continuous updates also contributes to a positive user experience, and many reviewers highlight its support team as exceptionally responsive.

Beds24’s rating is lower at 0/5, reflecting either outdated or limited recent reviews, making its usability harder to assess. Historically, its interface has been considered functional but not modern, with some users mentioning a steeper learning curve. Edge: Clock HMS.

Which Has Better Features: Beds24 or Clock HMS?

Beds24 offers 29 shared features plus 3 exclusive ones: guest communication, a mobile app, and employee messaging, focusing on automation and communication tools. It’s suitable for property management, online booking, and secure payments but lacks some advanced revenue or POS features.

Clock HMS provides 29 shared features plus 20 exclusive features, including multi-currency, POS, guest feedback, online checkout, and integrated ID scanning. Its suite is designed for revenue maximization, operational automation, and guest engagement.

The gap of 17 features in favor of Clock HMS indicates a broader, more integrated feature set for hotel-specific needs. Edge: Clock HMS.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Beds24 or Clock HMS?

Clock HMS’s reviews praise its support, with a 4.78/5 rating and comments like “excellent support,” “constant updates,” and “responsive team.” Users report that Clock’s support team actively listens and improves the system based on feedback.

Beds24’s support rating is unavailable, but its review count and recent activity suggest limited recent feedback. Historically, the platform is less prominent for support, and users have expressed frustration with navigating its interface and setup. Edge: Clock HMS.

Which Has More Integrations: Beds24 or Clock HMS?

Clock HMS boasts 111 verified partners, with shared integrations including TripAdvisor, Whistle, and RoomPriceGenie. Its extensive ecosystem supports property management, revenue, and guest engagement tools.

Beds24 has 19 verified partners, including major OTAs like Airbnb, Vrbo, and Booking.com, along with niche integrations like ChargeAutomation and Mini Hotel PMS. While fewer, these integrations cover essential booking channels.

For hotels with complex operational needs requiring a broad range of integrations, Clock HMS’s ecosystem is a significant advantage. Edge: Clock HMS.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Beds24 or Clock HMS?

Clock’s recent reviews and a 4.88/5 rating come from a variety of hotel segments, including boutique and independent properties, with many praising its revenue features and support. Its latest reviews underscore a high level of satisfaction and confidence among users.

Beds24’s review volume is zero, and its overall rating is 0/5, indicating no recent or verified positive feedback. Its lack of recent reviews makes it difficult to assess current user sentiment.

Given the recent data, Clock HMS clearly holds the higher rating and user confidence. Edge: Clock HMS.

How Much Do Beds24 and Clock HMS Cost?

Beds24 is priced at a flat $100 per month, with no freemium or trial options, making it budget-friendly for smaller operations. Its straightforward pricing is transparent but may lack flexibility for larger properties.

Clock HMS costs $600 per month with no additional connection or feature fees. Its higher price reflects its extensive feature set, integrations, and focus on revenue optimization, making it a more substantial investment.

If budget is a concern, Beds24’s lower cost may appeal, but for a comprehensive hotel system, Clock’s price aligns with its feature depth.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Beds24?

Hotels that need an affordable, flexible control panel for reservations, channel management, and automation.
Teams managing multiple property types, including vacation rentals, hostels, or small hotels.
Hotels looking for a solution that integrates with major booking platforms quickly.
Small to mid-sized properties seeking a straightforward, budget-friendly management tool.

Not ideal if:

You require extensive revenue management or POS features.
Your operation relies heavily on guest feedback or online check-in.
You need a highly modern or customizable user interface.

Not recommended for large hotel chains with complex revenue strategies or extensive POS needs.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Clock HMS?

Hotels focused on revenue generation through dynamic pricing and occupancy management.
Properties that need extensive integrations with OTAs, CRMs, and POS systems.
Larger hotels or groups seeking detailed analytics, online check-in, and guest engagement tools.
Hotels wanting a comprehensive, all-in-one platform for reservations, invoicing, and operations.

Not ideal if:

Your hotel is small, with simple management needs.
You prefer a lower-cost solution with fewer features.
You are primarily a vacation rental or small boutique property.

Not recommended if your priority is minimal automation or budget-conscious management.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Clock HMS is a feature-rich, highly integrated hotel management system that excels in revenue optimization, operational automation, and guest engagement. Its recent reviews and high rating demonstrate its appeal to hotels seeking robust, scalable solutions.

Beds24 offers a less expensive, flexible platform suited for smaller operations, vacation rentals, and property managers who value automation over revenue-specific features. Its limited recent feedback and lack of detailed reviews make it less compelling at this stage.

If your hotel needs a proven, highly-rated system with advanced revenue tools, Clock HMS is the clear choice. For budget-conscious hotels or property managers prioritizing channel management and automation, Beds24 remains worth considering, though it currently lacks recent user validation.

In conclusion:

For hotels wanting a system with real-time revenue management, extensive integrations, and high user satisfaction, Clock HMS is the superior pick.
If your hotel emphasizes cost, flexibility, and multi-property management with automation, Beds24 may suffice, but recent reviews favor Clock for confidence and support.

Choose based on your priorities: revenue vs affordability and flexibility.

Beds24 和 Clock HMS 的价格是多少？

酒店管理软件的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

	Beds24	Clock
Starting Price	From $100/mo	From $600/mo

Beds24 有哪些 Clock HMS 没有的功能（反之亦然）？

根据 HTR 的产品数据库，Beds24 和 Clock HMS 共享 29 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能	Beds24	Clock
员工信息
多币种
客人反馈管理
宾客沟通（短信）
平板电脑/自助值机
日历视图
移动应用程序
销售点
集中消息传递

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 11 项功能存在差异。

实际成果：Beds24 对比 Clock（按业务目标）

我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究，比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

提高运营效率

Beds24

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Gambino Hotels 小型

+ Result 1: Reduced manual work

+ Manual processes such as payment handling and reporting are now automated, saving time for the team.

+ �Things that used to be done manually are automated today

"Faster processes, faster training, more time for staff to focus on the guests, and tasks that used to be done manually are now automated."

Carsten Werblow

Head of Operations Gambino Hotels

Beds24 对比 Clock：总结

Beds24

0.0/5 来自 0 条评价

独特功能

宾客沟通（短信）移动应用程序员工信息

0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 19 个集成

查看资料

Clock

4.8/5 来自 80 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

Ease of Use and Accessibility 100% 正面

Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage ta... Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage tasks efficiently. Several reviews highlighted the ability to access the system from anywhere as a key benefit. The platform's user-friendly design is especially beneficial for new staff training.

Reservation and Booking Management 89% 正面

Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy re... Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy reservation management and integrates with channel managers, enabling automatic booking imports, which helps in maintaining real-time availability and reducing manual entry errors.

客户服务与支持 67% 正面

Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持，以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评，但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导... Clock PMS+ 提供可靠的客户支持，以快速响应而著称。尽管总体上受到好评，但也有用户反馈偶尔会出现指导错误以及需要专家建议的情况。用户建议改进用户体验指导和复杂功能支持。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

报告和分析 70% 负面

尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求，但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成，以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分... 尽管 Clock PMS+ 能够满足核心分析需求，但许多用户表示希望获得更完善、更可定制的报告功能。这包括与 Excel 集成，以及提供更详细的财务分析和运营指标。部分用户认为现有报告功能不足，且难以从中获取全面的洞察。

定制化和灵活性 67% 负面

用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置，以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意，但部分用户指出，他们希望修改报告和界面设置，以便更好地支持动态... 用户表示希望获得更多自定义选项和更灵活的设置，以满足酒店的特定需求。虽然总体上感到满意，但部分用户指出，他们希望修改报告和界面设置，以便更好地支持动态运营和营销策略。

排名更高的方面

小型（10-24 间客房） #21 vs #48

住宿加早餐与客栈 #20 vs #45

精品酒店 #18 vs #44

度假租赁与别墅 #20 vs #34

独特功能

多币种销售点客人反馈管理集中消息传递日历视图

4.8/5 易用性 4.8/5 客户支持 111 个集成

访问官网

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Clock 4.9 vs 0.0 (+4.9)

易用性 Clock 4.8 vs 0.0 (+4.8)

客户支持 Clock 4.8 vs 0.0 (+4.8)

性价比 Clock 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)

入职培训 Clock 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)

关于 Beds24 与 Clock HMS 的常见问题

Beds24 能否替代 Clock HMS？

这取决于您的需求。Beds24 和 Clock HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能，但各有独特的能力。Beds24 提供 19 个经验证的集成合作伙伴，而 Clock HMS 提供 111 个。在切换之前，请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店？

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Clock HMS 在易用性方面领先，评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价，了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Beds24 或 Clock HMS 是否提供免费方案？

Beds24：否。Clock HMS：否。两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前，请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Beds24 和 Clock HMS？

HT Score 是一个综合排名，考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量，帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Beds24 的 HT Score 为 0，Clock 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组	权重	衡量内容
客户评分与评价		用户对该产品的推荐度如何？评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分（推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率）、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性（最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价）以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。
合作伙伴生态系统		技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何？合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。
以客户为中心		该组织以客户为中心的程度如何？认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集（反馈驱动文化的指标）以及产品资料是否完整，包括功能、截图、定价和特性。
覆盖范围、持久力与资源		该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛？地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖（服务的国家和区域）、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标，以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

Beds24 vs. Clock HMS:
哪个更适合您？