The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 572 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Beds24 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Guest Messaging.
RoomRaccoon 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Post-stay emails and Pre-stay emails.
基于 HTR 上 572 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $100/mo | From $1,000/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 572 |
在分析了 572 条经验证的评价后,Beds24 用户最看重其 ,而 RoomRaccoon 用户则强调 易用性, 客户服务, 持续改进。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
持续改进
▾
|
|
|
+
集成与自动化
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
关键问题
▾
|
|
|
−
定价问题
▾
|
|
|
−
访客数据库透明度
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #48 0 条评价 | #5 214 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #8 50 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 18 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #8 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #44 0 条评价 | #3 245 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #4 149 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #5 70 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #3 72 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #30 0 条评价 | #14 11 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 445 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #8 9 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #17 3 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel management software can significantly impact your daily operations, guest experience, and revenue. Beds24 and RoomRaccoon both aim to streamline hotel and vacation rental management, but they approach this goal differently. Beds24 is a more traditional, broad-spectrum platform with a focus on automation and extensive integrations, while RoomRaccoon emphasizes user-friendliness, innovative features, and strong customer support. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Beds24 offers a comprehensive, flexible solution with a wide array of integrations, but it has fewer recent reviews and a lower overall rating. RoomRaccoon, by contrast, is highly rated with hundreds of recent reviews, emphasizing ease of use and customer satisfaction. Are you prioritizing proven user satisfaction or a more customizable, feature-rich platform?
Both platforms target small and independent hotels, but they diverge in scope and user experience. Beds24 provides an all-in-one system with automation, property management, and channel management, but its interface and onboarding process are less praised, with a 0/5 rating for ease of use and onboarding. Conversely, RoomRaccoon boasts a 4.87/5 ease of use score, backed by recent reviews that praise its intuitive design and quick onboarding.
RoomRaccoon’s 484 reviews in the last six months, combined with a 97% likelihood to recommend, highlight its strong current user base and positive word-of-mouth. Beds24, despite its broad feature set, has no recent reviews, which suggests less recent validation. Given the data, RoomRaccoon appears more trusted by current users, while Beds24’s broader connectivity and automation might appeal to those needing deep customization.
If your hotel needs a flexible, highly customizable platform capable of managing multiple properties and extensive integrations, Beds24’s 19 verified partners and features like custom rates, guest messaging, and automation could be advantageous. It’s suited for tech-savvy teams willing to handle a steeper learning curve.
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, fast onboarding, and a highly rated customer experience, RoomRaccoon is the better choice. Its more than 88 verified integrations, automated revenue management, and features like guest apps and multi-currency support cater well to independent hoteliers who want to grow efficiently. For most hotels, especially those seeking straightforward implementation, RoomRaccoon offers a clearer path to success.
RoomRaccoon’s 4.87/5 ease of use score, driven by recent reviews, indicates an interface that most hoteliers find intuitive, with straightforward onboarding. Its design reduces training time and minimizes staff resistance, making daily operations smoother.
Beds24’s 0/5 rating for ease of use and onboarding suggests a complex interface that requires significant training and technical knowledge. Its steep learning curve may slow initial adoption and increase staff frustration. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Beds24 offers 8 unique features, including direct billing, guest messaging, housekeeper mobile apps, automated assignments, and custom rates—powerful tools for automation and communication. However, RoomRaccoon boasts 33 exclusive features such as special offers & discounts, automated reporting, loyalty programs, multi-lingual support, POS, online checkout, and guest apps, covering broader operational needs.
While Beds24’s features are robust, RoomRaccoon’s wider feature set provides more options for revenue growth, automation, and guest engagement. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s recent review scores of 4.74/5 for customer support and 8 recent reviews highlight a generally positive experience with support and onboarding. Users frequently mention that support is prompt, helpful, and accessible, with specific praise for onboarding ease.
Beds24 has no recent reviews, making it difficult to assess current support quality. Given the active, positive feedback for RoomRaccoon, it clearly offers superior support. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s 88 verified integrations include notable partners like Sage, Epos Now, and multiple booking channels, providing comprehensive ecosystem connectivity. Beds24 has 19 verified partners, such as VRScheduler and Guest Technologies, but its list is less extensive.
The broader integration pool in RoomRaccoon allows for more tailored operational workflows and guest experience enhancements. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s 4.95/5 overall rating, based on hundreds of recent reviews, reflects widespread satisfaction, especially among small hotels and B&Bs. Many reviewers highlight its simplicity, automation, and revenue-boosting features, with some noting that it saves hours daily.
Beds24’s rating is 0/5, with no recent reviews, indicating a lack of current user validation. Given the recent positive feedback and high ratings, RoomRaccoon is clearly favored. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Beds24 charges a $100 monthly flat fee, with no free tier or trial, offering a straightforward pricing model. RoomRaccoon’s starting price is $1,000 per month, also without a free trial, which could be a barrier for small properties.
Despite the higher cost, RoomRaccoon’s extensive features and support justify the investment for most hotels seeking growth and automation. Beds24’s lower price point may appeal to budget-conscious operators willing to handle a more complex system.
Not ideal if your team prefers quick onboarding, intuitive design, or minimal technical knowledge. Beds24 might be overwhelming for smaller hotels or those new to PMS systems.
Not ideal if your hotel requires very specific custom integrations not supported by RoomRaccoon or operates at a scale where a more customizable system is necessary. It’s best suited for small to medium properties focused on growth.
The core difference is that Beds24 offers a broad, customizable management system with automation and extensive integrations but with a steep learning curve. RoomRaccoon prioritizes simplicity, automation, and excellent support, making it more accessible for small hotels and independent operators.
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich platform capable of deep customization and you’re prepared for a longer onboarding, Beds24 could work. However, for most hotels seeking quick setup, high satisfaction, and ongoing support, RoomRaccoon is the clear choice.
Choosing RoomRaccoon means investing in a system proven to enhance efficiency, boost revenue, and improve guest satisfaction, supported by recent, glowing reviews. Beds24’s extensive connectivity may appeal to highly technical teams, but its lack of recent validation makes it less appealing for most hotels today.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $1,000/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Beds24 和 RoomRaccoon HMS 共享 24 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 客房服务手机应用程序 | ||
| 宾客沟通(短信) | ||
| 宾客留言 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 自动报告 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 29 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户称赞 RoomRaccoon 具有用户友好的界面和直观的设计,这减少了培训时间,并能顺利融入日常操作,从而提高了整体效率。
虽然一些用户称赞支持团队的响应速度和专业水平,但另一些用户则批评售后服务和响应效率不足,这表明客户服务质量存在不一致之处。
用户赞赏 RoomRaccoon 的持续发展,包括 AI 的增强,这些都有助于提高销售和运营功能,展现了其对长期适应性的承诺。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
多篇评论指出,售后支持不力、技术问题悬而未决等关键问题严重影响了用户满意度和对系统的信任度。
一些用户,尤其是那些经营季节性业务的用户,认为该系统的定价过高,这影响了他们的决策,尽管他们认为该系统包含的功能很有价值。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Beds24 和 RoomRaccoon HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Beds24 提供 19 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RoomRaccoon HMS 提供 88 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RoomRaccoon HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Beds24:否。RoomRaccoon HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Beds24 的 HT Score 为 0,RoomRaccoon 的为 86。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问